Literature DB >> 25053724

Device-dependent association between paravalvar aortic regurgitation and outcome after TAVI.

Rafal Dworakowski1, Olaf Wendler1, Brian Halliday1, Peter Ludman2, Mark DeBelder3, Simon Ray4, Neil Moat5, Jan Kovac6, Tomasz Spyt6, Uday Trivedi7, David Hildick-Smith7, Dan Blackman8, Damian Marlee9, David Cunningham9, Philip A MacCarthy1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to identify predictors of paraprosthetic aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and examine its influence on short/medium-term mortality using the UK TAVI Registry. TAVI is an effective treatment for high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), but paraprosthetic AR has been associated with increased in-hospital and mid-term mortality.
METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2011, 2584 TAVI procedures were performed in the UK. Patients undergoing 'valve-in-valve' procedures, patients with aortic regurgitation as the primary pathology and with no recorded severity of AR were excluded from this analysis (n=144). In total, therefore, 2440 patients were included. Balloon-expandable and self-expanding devices were implanted in 52.7 and 47.2%, respectively, using either transfemoral (67.7%) or non-transfemoral, surgical access (32.3%).
RESULTS: Postprocedural AR was observed in 68%, mild AR in 57% and moderate-severe in 10%. A large aortic annulus, high preprocedural transaortic gradient, and use of self-expanding valve were independent predictors of moderate-severe AR. Moderate-severe (but not mild) AR was associated with increased mortality, and this relationship appeared significant for the balloon-expandable but not the self-expanding device.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a large aortic annulus, high preprocedural transaortic gradient, and use of the self-expanding valve predict moderate-severe AR after TAVI. Such a degree of AR is associated with a significantly worse outcome with the balloon-expandable, but not with the self-expanding valve. Further studies are needed to verify this and explore potential mechanisms. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25053724     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-305390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  4 in total

1.  Association of Paravalvular Regurgitation With 1-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the SAPIEN 3 Valve.

Authors:  Philippe Pibarot; Rebecca T Hahn; Neil J Weissman; Marie Arsenault; Jonathan Beaudoin; Mathieu Bernier; Abdellaziz Dahou; Omar K Khalique; Federico M Asch; Oumhani Toubal; Jonathon Leipsic; Philipp Blanke; Feifan Zhang; Rupa Parvataneni; Maria Alu; Howard Herrmann; Raj Makkar; Michael Mack; Richard Smalling; Martin Leon; Vinod H Thourani; Susheel Kodali
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  30-Day Outcomes after Surgical or Transapical Aortic Valve Replacement in Symptomatic Aortic Regurgitation.

Authors:  Minjian Kong; Ze Hong; Xianbao Liu; Xian Zhu; Jianan Wang; Aiqiang Dong
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-07-14

3.  Risk factors for paravalvular leak after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Krzysztof Wilczek; Kamil Bujak; Rafał Reguła; Piotr Chodór; Tadeusz Osadnik
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2015-06-30

4.  Systemic inflammation and oxidative stress contribute to acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Arunraj Navaratnarajah; Amit Bhan; Emma Alcock; Tracy Dew; Mark Monaghan; Ajay M Shah; Olaf Wendler; Philip MacCarthy; Rafal Dworakowski
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 3.487

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.