A Milner1, A D LaMontagne2, Z Aitken3, R Bentley3, A M Kavanagh3. 1. The McCaughey Vichealth Centre for Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 2. The McCaughey Vichealth Centre for Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Population Health Strategic Research Centre, School of Health & Social Development, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 3. Gender and Women's Health, Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Unemployment and economic inactivity are associated with worse mental health in the general population, but there is limited understanding of whether these relationships are different for those persons with mental or physical disabilities. The aim of this study was to assess whether there were differences in mental health by labour force status among persons with and without disabilities. METHOD: Over eight annual waves of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, a total of 2379 people with disabilities and 11 417 people without disabilities were identified. Mental health using the Mental Component Summary (MCS) from the Short Form 36 was modelled as a function of labour force status using fixed-effects regression models to control for time invariant confounding. Differences between those with and without disabilities were assessed by including an interaction term in regression models. RESULTS: After finding evidence of effect modification, regression models were stratified by disability status. After adjustment, unemployment and economic inactivity were associated with a -1.85 (95% CI -2.96 to -0.73, p=0.001) and -2.66 (95% CI -3.46 to -1.86, p<0.001) reduction in scores of the MCS among those with a disability. For those without a disability, there were smaller declines associated with unemployment (-0.57, 95% CI -1.02 to -0.12, p=0.013) and economic inactivity (-0.34, 95% CI -0.64 to 0.05, p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a greater reduction in mental health for those persons with disabilities who were unemployed or economically inactive than those who were employed. This highlights the value of employment for people with disabilities. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: Unemployment and economic inactivity are associated with worse mental health in the general population, but there is limited understanding of whether these relationships are different for those persons with mental or physical disabilities. The aim of this study was to assess whether there were differences in mental health by labour force status among persons with and without disabilities. METHOD: Over eight annual waves of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, a total of 2379 people with disabilities and 11 417 people without disabilities were identified. Mental health using the Mental Component Summary (MCS) from the Short Form 36 was modelled as a function of labour force status using fixed-effects regression models to control for time invariant confounding. Differences between those with and without disabilities were assessed by including an interaction term in regression models. RESULTS: After finding evidence of effect modification, regression models were stratified by disability status. After adjustment, unemployment and economic inactivity were associated with a -1.85 (95% CI -2.96 to -0.73, p=0.001) and -2.66 (95% CI -3.46 to -1.86, p<0.001) reduction in scores of the MCS among those with a disability. For those without a disability, there were smaller declines associated with unemployment (-0.57, 95% CI -1.02 to -0.12, p=0.013) and economic inactivity (-0.34, 95% CI -0.64 to 0.05, p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a greater reduction in mental health for those persons with disabilities who were unemployed or economically inactive than those who were employed. This highlights the value of employment for people with disabilities. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: Jorge D Machicado; Stephen T Amann; Michelle A Anderson; Judah Abberbock; Stuart Sherman; Darwin L Conwell; Gregory A Cote; Vikesh K Singh; Michele D Lewis; Samer Alkaade; Bimaljit S Sandhu; Nalini M Guda; Thiruvengadam Muniraj; Gong Tang; John Baillie; Randall E Brand; Timothy B Gardner; Andres Gelrud; Christopher E Forsmark; Peter A Banks; Adam Slivka; C Mel Wilcox; David C Whitcomb; Dhiraj Yadav Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Anne Marie Kavanagh; Zoe Aitken; Lauren Krnjacki; Anthony Daniel LaMontagne; Rebecca Bentley; Allison Milner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anne M Kavanagh; Zoe Aitken; Eric Emerson; Sash Sahabandu; Allison Milner; Rebecca Bentley; Anthony D LaMontagne; Jane Pirkis; David Studdert Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Ilse Louwerse; Maaike A Huysmans; H Jolanda van Rijssen; Allard J van der Beek; Johannes R Anema Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-01-18 Impact factor: 3.295