Literature DB >> 25053599

Risk/benefit profile of panitumumab-based therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: evidence from five randomized controlled trials.

Na-Ping Tang1, Hua Li, Yun-Liang Qiu, Guo-Min Zhou, Yan Wang, Jing Ma, Yan Chang, Qi-Bing Mei.   

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the risk and benefit profiles of panitumumab-based therapy (PBT) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Relevant randomized controlled trials were identified by searching PubMed, Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Data on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), all grade and severe (grade ≥3) adverse events were extracted and pooled to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Number needed to treat (NNT) for PFS and number needed to harm (NNH) for significantly changed toxicities were calculated. A total of 4,155 patients were included in the analysis. PBT significantly improved PFS (HRrandom = 0.66, 95 % CI = 0.45-0.95) but not OS (HRfixed = 0.93, 95 % CI = 0.83-1.04) when used in the subsequent-line setting. The effect on PFS was more evident in patients with wild-type KRAS (HRrandom = 0.64, 95 % CI = 0.47-0.87) and the NNT for PFS is 11 to 23at 1 year. PBT did not benefit patients when used in the first-line setting. In addition, PBT significantly increased the risk of skin toxicity, infections, diarrhea, dehydration, mucositis, hypokalemia, fatigue, hypomagnesemia, pulmonary embolism and paronychia. The NNHs for skin toxicity, diarrhea, infection, hypokalemia and mucositis are less than 23. In conclusion, when used in the subsequent-line setting, PBT can improve the disease progression, especially in mCRC patients with wild-type KRAS. Regarding the adverse events associated with the PBT, close monitoring and necessary preparations are recommended during the therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25053599     DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2354-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  39 in total

1.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Impaired basolateral sorting of pro-EGF causes isolated recessive renal hypomagnesemia.

Authors:  Wouter M Tiel Groenestege; Stéphanie Thébault; Jenny van der Wijst; Dennis van den Berg; Rob Janssen; Sabine Tejpar; Lambertus P van den Heuvel; Eric van Cutsem; Joost G Hoenderop; Nine V Knoers; René J Bindels
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?

Authors:  D Moher; B Pham; A Jones; D J Cook; A R Jadad; M Moher; P Tugwell; T P Klassen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-08-22       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Dermatologic side effects associated with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors.

Authors:  Anna Liza C Agero; Stephen W Dusza; Cristiane Benvenuto-Andrade; Klaus J Busam; Patricia Myskowski; Allan C Halpern
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 5.  Hypomagnesaemia and targeted anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents.

Authors:  Andreia Costa; Sabine Tejpar; Hans Prenen; Eric Van Cutsem
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 4.493

6.  A randomised phase III trial of the pharmacokinetic biomodulation of irinotecan using oral ciclosporin in advanced colorectal cancer: results of the Panitumumab, Irinotecan & Ciclosporin in COLOrectal cancer therapy trial (PICCOLO).

Authors:  Gary Middleton; Sarah Brown; Catherine Lowe; Timothy Maughan; Stephen Gwyther; Alfred Oliver; Susan Richman; Denise Blake; Vicky Napp; Helen Marshall; Jonathan Wadsley; Nick Maisey; Ian Chau; Mark Hill; Simon Gollins; Sun Myint; Sarah Slater; John Wagstaff; John Bridgewater; Matthew Seymour
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Benefit of operative mortality reduction on colorectal cancer survival.

Authors:  E Mitry; A-M Bouvier; J Esteve; J Faivre
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Biological interaction between anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agent cetuximab and magnesium.

Authors:  Bruno Vincenzi; Daniele Santini; Giuseppe Tonini
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.889

9.  Epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number and clinical outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab.

Authors:  Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Mauro Moroni; Silvio Veronese; Carlo Carnaghi; Emilio Bajetta; Gabriele Luppi; Alberto Sobrero; Carlo Barone; Stefano Cascinu; Giuseppe Colucci; Enrico Cortesi; Michele Nichelatti; Marcello Gambacorta; Salvatore Siena
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab in first- or second-line treatment.

Authors:  L Bennett; Z Zhao; B Barber; X Zhou; M Peeters; J Zhang; F Xu; J Wiezorek; J-Y Douillard
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of systemic adjuvant, neoadjuvant and perioperative chemotherapy for resectable colorectal-liver metastases.

Authors:  Emily Khoo; Stephen O'Neill; Ewan Brown; Stephen J Wigmore; Ewen M Harrison
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Cardiovascular Toxicity of Targeted Therapies for Cancer: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Marina T Van Leeuwen; Steven Luu; Howard Gurney; Martin R Brown; Sallie-Anne Pearson; Kate Webber; Lee Hunt; Soojung Hong; Geoffrey P Delaney; Claire M Vajdic
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2020-08-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.