W Nathaniel Brennen1, D Marc Rosen, Alcides Chaux, George J Netto, John T Isaacs, Samuel R Denmeade. 1. Chemical Therapeutics Program, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As carcinoma progresses, the stroma undergoes a variety of phenotypic changes, including the presence of carcinoma-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) that express fibroblast activation protein (FAP). FAP is a post-prolyl endopeptidase whose expression in a healthy adult is largely restricted to the cancer-associated stroma. FAP-targeted prodrugs with a 100-fold greater therapeutic window over the parent compound were previously generated. METHODS: Prodrugs and non-cleavable controls were incubated in the presence of FAP. Plasma and tumor half-lives (t1/2) of the full-length and active forms of the prodrugs were determined using LCMS. Biodistribution studies of prodrug activation were performed. Histopathological analysis of tissues from treated animals were compared to vehicle-treated controls. Toxicity and efficacy studies were performed in human breast (MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7) and prostate (LNCaP) cancer xenografts models. RESULTS: These FAP-activated prodrugs have a significantly slower clearance from tumor tissue than the circulation (∼12 vs. ∼4.5 hr). Micromolar concentrations of active drug persist in the tumor. Active drug is detected in non-target tissues; however, histopathologic evaluation reveals no evidence of drug-induced toxicity. A FAP-activated prodrug (ERGETGP-S12ADT) inhibits tumor growth in multiple human breast and prostate cancer xenograft models. The anti-tumor effect is comparable to that observed with docetaxel, but results in significantly less toxicity. CONCLUSION: FAP-activated prodrugs are a viable strategy for the management of prostate and other cancers. These prodrugs exhibit less toxicity than a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent. Further refinement of the FAP cleavage site for greater specificity may reduce prodrug activation in non-target tissues and enhance clinical benefit.
BACKGROUND: As carcinoma progresses, the stroma undergoes a variety of phenotypic changes, including the presence of carcinoma-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) that express fibroblast activation protein (FAP). FAP is a post-prolyl endopeptidase whose expression in a healthy adult is largely restricted to the cancer-associated stroma. FAP-targeted prodrugs with a 100-fold greater therapeutic window over the parent compound were previously generated. METHODS: Prodrugs and non-cleavable controls were incubated in the presence of FAP. Plasma and tumor half-lives (t1/2) of the full-length and active forms of the prodrugs were determined using LCMS. Biodistribution studies of prodrug activation were performed. Histopathological analysis of tissues from treated animals were compared to vehicle-treated controls. Toxicity and efficacy studies were performed in human breast (MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7) and prostate (LNCaP) cancer xenografts models. RESULTS: These FAP-activated prodrugs have a significantly slower clearance from tumor tissue than the circulation (∼12 vs. ∼4.5 hr). Micromolar concentrations of active drug persist in the tumor. Active drug is detected in non-target tissues; however, histopathologic evaluation reveals no evidence of drug-induced toxicity. A FAP-activated prodrug (ERGETGP-S12ADT) inhibits tumor growth in multiple humanbreast and prostate cancer xenograft models. The anti-tumor effect is comparable to that observed with docetaxel, but results in significantly less toxicity. CONCLUSION:FAP-activated prodrugs are a viable strategy for the management of prostate and other cancers. These prodrugs exhibit less toxicity than a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent. Further refinement of the FAP cleavage site for greater specificity may reduce prodrug activation in non-target tissues and enhance clinical benefit.
Authors: J Niedermeyer; M J Scanlan; P Garin-Chesa; C Daiber; H H Fiebig; L J Old; W J Rettig; A Schnapp Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 1997-05-02 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: J Niedermeyer; M Kriz; F Hilberg; P Garin-Chesa; U Bamberger; M C Lenter; J Park; B Viertel; H Püschner; M Mauz; W J Rettig; A Schnapp Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: M T Levy; G W McCaughan; C A Abbott; J E Park; A M Cunningham; E Müller; W J Rettig; M D Gorrell Journal: Hepatology Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Samuel R Denmeade; Carsten M Jakobsen; Samuel Janssen; Saeed R Khan; Elizabeth S Garrett; Hans Lilja; S Brogger Christensen; John T Isaacs Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-07-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: W J Rettig; P Garin-Chesa; J H Healey; S L Su; H L Ozer; M Schwab; A P Albino; L J Old Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1993-07-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: W Nathaniel Brennen; D Marc Rosen; Hao Wang; John T Isaacs; Samuel R Denmeade Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Kenneth W Jackson; Victoria J Christiansen; Vivek R Yadav; Robert Silasi-Mansat; Florea Lupu; Vibhudutta Awasthi; Roy R Zhang; Patrick A McKee Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Peio Errarte; Rosa Guarch; Rafael Pulido; Lorena Blanco; Caroline E Nunes-Xavier; Maider Beitia; Javier Gil; Javier C Angulo; José I López; Gorka Larrinaga Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Amanda B Hesterberg; Brenda L Rios; Elysa M Wolf; Colby Tubbs; Hong Yuen Wong; Kerry R Schaffer; Tamara L Lotan; Giovanna A Giannico; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Paula J Hurley Journal: J Pathol Clin Res Date: 2021-02-18
Authors: Xiaoqi Mao; Jin Xu; Wei Wang; Chen Liang; Jie Hua; Jiang Liu; Bo Zhang; Qingcai Meng; Xianjun Yu; Si Shi Journal: Mol Cancer Date: 2021-10-11 Impact factor: 27.401
Authors: W Nathaniel Brennen; Daniel L J Thorek; Wen Jiang; Timothy E Krueger; Lizamma Antony; Samuel R Denmeade; John T Isaacs Journal: Immunotherapy Date: 2020-11-05 Impact factor: 4.196
Authors: John T Isaacs; William Nathaniel Brennen; Søren Brøgger Christensen; Samuel R Denmeade Journal: Molecules Date: 2021-12-09 Impact factor: 4.411