BACKGROUND: The optimal sequencing of the multiple active agents now available for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is unclear. Prior reports have suggested diminished responses to sequential lines of androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapies, but it is unknown whether subsequent taxane-based chemotherapy may be more effective than sequential AR-targeting treatment. We sought to evaluate the clinical activity of enzalutamide versus docetaxel in men with mCRPC who progressed on abiraterone. METHODS: We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of consecutive mCRPC patients who had progressed on abiraterone therapy and subsequently received either enzalutamide (n=30) or docetaxel (n=31). We evaluated clinical outcomes including prostate-specific antigen decline of >30% (PSA30) or >50% (PSA50), PSA-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), and clinical/radiographic PFS. We performed multivariable modeling to control for baseline and on-treatment differences between groups. RESULTS: Compared to subjects who received enzalutamide post-abiraterone, subjects who received docetaxel post-abiraterone had more bone metastases, more visceral metastases, higher baseline PSA, and had more frequent PSA tests while on-treatment. There were no significant differences in PSA30 (41% for enzalutamide vs. 53% for docetaxel) or PSA50 (34% vs. 40%) response rates between the two groups; there remained no difference after stratifying by presence/absence of prior response to abiraterone. Median PSA-PFS was 4.1 versus 4.1 months for the enzalutamide and docetaxel cohorts, respectively (HR 1.35, 95% CI, 0.53-3.66, P=0.502). Median PFS was 4.7 versus 4.4 months, respectively (HR 1.44, 95% CI, 0.77-2.71, P=0.257). PSA-PFS and PFS did not differ after stratifying by prior response to abiraterone. In multivariable analyses, there were no significant differences in PSA-PFS or PFS between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with either enzalutamide or docetaxel produced modest PSA responses and PFS intervals in this abiraterone-pretreated mCRPC population. In this retrospective study with small sample size, no significant differences in outcomes were observed between groups. Therefore, either enzalutamide or docetaxel may be a reasonable option in men who have progressed on abiraterone.
BACKGROUND: The optimal sequencing of the multiple active agents now available for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is unclear. Prior reports have suggested diminished responses to sequential lines of androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapies, but it is unknown whether subsequent taxane-based chemotherapy may be more effective than sequential AR-targeting treatment. We sought to evaluate the clinical activity of enzalutamide versus docetaxel in men with mCRPC who progressed on abiraterone. METHODS: We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of consecutive mCRPC patients who had progressed on abiraterone therapy and subsequently received either enzalutamide (n=30) or docetaxel (n=31). We evaluated clinical outcomes including prostate-specific antigen decline of >30% (PSA30) or >50% (PSA50), PSA-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), and clinical/radiographic PFS. We performed multivariable modeling to control for baseline and on-treatment differences between groups. RESULTS: Compared to subjects who received enzalutamide post-abiraterone, subjects who received docetaxel post-abiraterone had more bone metastases, more visceral metastases, higher baseline PSA, and had more frequent PSA tests while on-treatment. There were no significant differences in PSA30 (41% for enzalutamide vs. 53% for docetaxel) or PSA50 (34% vs. 40%) response rates between the two groups; there remained no difference after stratifying by presence/absence of prior response to abiraterone. Median PSA-PFS was 4.1 versus 4.1 months for the enzalutamide and docetaxel cohorts, respectively (HR 1.35, 95% CI, 0.53-3.66, P=0.502). Median PFS was 4.7 versus 4.4 months, respectively (HR 1.44, 95% CI, 0.77-2.71, P=0.257). PSA-PFS and PFS did not differ after stratifying by prior response to abiraterone. In multivariable analyses, there were no significant differences in PSA-PFS or PFS between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with either enzalutamide or docetaxel produced modest PSA responses and PFS intervals in this abiraterone-pretreated mCRPC population. In this retrospective study with small sample size, no significant differences in outcomes were observed between groups. Therefore, either enzalutamide or docetaxel may be a reasonable option in men who have progressed on abiraterone.
Authors: Elahe A Mostaghel; Brett T Marck; Stephen R Plymate; Robert L Vessella; Stephen Balk; Alvin M Matsumoto; Peter S Nelson; R Bruce Montgomery Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Karim Fizazi; Howard I Scher; Arturo Molina; Christopher J Logothetis; Kim N Chi; Robert J Jones; John N Staffurth; Scott North; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Fred Saad; Paul Mainwaring; Stephen Harland; Oscar B Goodman; Cora N Sternberg; Jin Hui Li; Thian Kheoh; Christopher M Haqq; Johann S de Bono Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Howard I Scher; Karim Fizazi; Fred Saad; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Cora N Sternberg; Kurt Miller; Ronald de Wit; Peter Mulders; Kim N Chi; Neal D Shore; Andrew J Armstrong; Thomas W Flaig; Aude Fléchon; Paul Mainwaring; Mark Fleming; John D Hainsworth; Mohammad Hirmand; Bryan Selby; Lynn Seely; Johann S de Bono Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Medha S Darshan; Matthew S Loftus; Maria Thadani-Mulero; Benjamin P Levy; Daniel Escuin; Xi Kathy Zhou; Ada Gjyrezi; Chantal Chanel-Vos; Ruoqian Shen; Scott T Tagawa; Neil H Bander; David M Nanus; Paraskevi Giannakakou Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Howard I Scher; Susan Halabi; Ian Tannock; Michael Morris; Cora N Sternberg; Michael A Carducci; Mario A Eisenberger; Celestia Higano; Glenn J Bubley; Robert Dreicer; Daniel Petrylak; Philip Kantoff; Ethan Basch; William Kevin Kelly; William D Figg; Eric J Small; Tomasz M Beer; George Wilding; Alison Martin; Maha Hussain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Dana E Rathkopf; Matthew R Smith; Johann S de Bono; Christopher J Logothetis; Neal D Shore; Paul de Souza; Karim Fizazi; Peter F A Mulders; Paul Mainwaring; John D Hainsworth; Tomasz M Beer; Scott North; Yves Fradet; Hendrik Van Poppel; Joan Carles; Thomas W Flaig; Eleni Efstathiou; Evan Y Yu; Celestia S Higano; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Thomas W Griffin; Mary B Todd; Margaret K Yu; Youn C Park; Thian Kheoh; Eric J Small; Howard I Scher; Arturo Molina; Charles J Ryan; Fred Saad Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: J Mezynski; C Pezaro; D Bianchini; A Zivi; S Sandhu; E Thompson; J Hunt; E Sheridan; B Baikady; A Sarvadikar; G Maier; A H M Reid; A Mulick Cassidy; D Olmos; G Attard; J de Bono Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Y Loriot; D Bianchini; E Ileana; S Sandhu; A Patrikidou; C Pezaro; L Albiges; G Attard; K Fizazi; J S De Bono; C Massard Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2013-04-10 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: R Petrioli; G Roviello; A I Fiaschi; L Laera; Salvatora T Miano; G De Rubertis; G Barbanti; V Bianco; S Brozzetti; E Francini Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2015-01-31 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Hung-Ming Lam; Ryan McMullin; Holly M Nguyen; Ilsa Coleman; Michael Gormley; Roman Gulati; Lisha G Brown; Sarah K Holt; Weimin Li; Deborah S Ricci; Karin Verstraeten; Shibu Thomas; Elahe A Mostaghel; Peter S Nelson; Robert L Vessella; Eva Corey Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 12.531