BACKGROUND: Caregivers of persons with first-episode psychosis (FEP) often report high levels of distress. Preventing long-term or chronic distress within the whole family is an important focus of early intervention for psychosis. However, a more comprehensive understanding of the psychological factors involved is needed. AIMS: To examine the impact of subjective appraisals and expressed emotion on caregiver distress in FEP. METHOD: Within a cross-sectional design, 154 caregivers of 99 persons with FEP in a clinical epidemiological sample completed a series of questionnaires to examine potential predictors of caregiver distress. RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent of caregivers were suffering from clinically significant distress. A linear mixed model analysis found that, after controlling for caregiver socio-demographic factors, service-user symptoms and global functioning, emotional over-involvement and subjective appraisal of caregiving were significant predictors of caregiver distress. CONCLUSION: Caregiver distress is significant in the early phase of illness, and this seems to be more related to their subjective appraisal and over-involvement, than to variations in symptoms and global functioning of the person diagnosed with FEP. This lends further support to the stress-appraisal coping model and the cognitive model of caregiving in FEP, and highlights supportive interventions aimed at handling unhelpful cognitions and behaviors.
BACKGROUND: Caregivers of persons with first-episode psychosis (FEP) often report high levels of distress. Preventing long-term or chronic distress within the whole family is an important focus of early intervention for psychosis. However, a more comprehensive understanding of the psychological factors involved is needed. AIMS: To examine the impact of subjective appraisals and expressed emotion on caregiver distress in FEP. METHOD: Within a cross-sectional design, 154 caregivers of 99 persons with FEP in a clinical epidemiological sample completed a series of questionnaires to examine potential predictors of caregiver distress. RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent of caregivers were suffering from clinically significant distress. A linear mixed model analysis found that, after controlling for caregiver socio-demographic factors, service-user symptoms and global functioning, emotional over-involvement and subjective appraisal of caregiving were significant predictors of caregiver distress. CONCLUSION: Caregiver distress is significant in the early phase of illness, and this seems to be more related to their subjective appraisal and over-involvement, than to variations in symptoms and global functioning of the person diagnosed with FEP. This lends further support to the stress-appraisal coping model and the cognitive model of caregiving in FEP, and highlights supportive interventions aimed at handling unhelpful cognitions and behaviors.
Authors: G I Szmukler; P Burgess; H Herrman; A Benson; S Colusa; S Bloch Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Juliana Onwumere; Elizabeth Kuipers; Paul Bebbington; Graham Dunn; Daniel Freeman; David Fowler; Philippa Garety Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Nicholas J K Breitborde; Steven R López; Christina Chang; Alex Kopelowicz; Roberto Zarate Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Alicia Lucksted; Jennifer Stevenson; Ilana Nossel; Amy Drapalski; Sarah Piscitelli; Lisa B Dixon Journal: Early Interv Psychiatry Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 2.732
Authors: J Onwumere; C Bonetto; A Lasalvia; E Miglietta; A Veronese; F Bellini; M Imbesi; P Bebbington; E Kuipers; M Ruggeri Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 6.892