OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate if autologous freshly isolated regulatory T cells (Tregs) provide a protective and supportive role when cotransplanted with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). METHODS: In a porcine model of chronic ischemia, autologous MSCs were isolated and expanded ex vivo for 4 weeks. Autologous Treg cells were freshly isolated from 100 mL peripheral blood and purified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. MSCs and Treg cells were then cotransplanted into the chronic ischemic myocardium of Yorkshire pigs by direct intramyocardial injection (1.2 × 10(8) MSCs plus an average of 1.5 million Treg cells in 25 injection sites). Animals were killed 6 weeks postinjection to study the fate of the cells and compare the effect of combined MSCs + Treg cells transplantation versus MSCs alone. RESULTS: The coinjection of MSCs along with Tregs was safe and no deleterious side effects were observed. Six weeks after injection of the cell combination, spherical MSCs clusters with thin layer capsules were found in the injected areas. In animals treated with MSCs only, the MSC clusters were less organized and not encapsulated. Immunofluorescent staining showed CD25+ cells among the CD90+ (MSC marker) cells, suggesting that the injected Treg cells remained present locally, and survived. Factor VIII+ cells were also prevalent suggesting new angiogenesis. We found no evidence that coinjections were associated with the generation of cardiac myocytes. CONCLUSIONS: The cotransplantation of Treg cells with MSCs dramatically increased the MSC survival rate, proliferation, and augmented their role in angiogenesis, which suggests a new way for future clinical application of cell-based therapy. Published by Mosby, Inc.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate if autologous freshly isolated regulatory T cells (Tregs) provide a protective and supportive role when cotransplanted with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). METHODS: In a porcine model of chronic ischemia, autologous MSCs were isolated and expanded ex vivo for 4 weeks. Autologous Treg cells were freshly isolated from 100 mL peripheral blood and purified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. MSCs and Treg cells were then cotransplanted into the chronic ischemic myocardium of Yorkshire pigs by direct intramyocardial injection (1.2 × 10(8) MSCs plus an average of 1.5 million Treg cells in 25 injection sites). Animals were killed 6 weeks postinjection to study the fate of the cells and compare the effect of combined MSCs + Treg cells transplantation versus MSCs alone. RESULTS: The coinjection of MSCs along with Tregs was safe and no deleterious side effects were observed. Six weeks after injection of the cell combination, spherical MSCs clusters with thin layer capsules were found in the injected areas. In animals treated with MSCs only, the MSC clusters were less organized and not encapsulated. Immunofluorescent staining showed CD25+ cells among the CD90+ (MSC marker) cells, suggesting that the injected Treg cells remained present locally, and survived. Factor VIII+ cells were also prevalent suggesting new angiogenesis. We found no evidence that coinjections were associated with the generation of cardiac myocytes. CONCLUSIONS: The cotransplantation of Treg cells with MSCs dramatically increased the MSC survival rate, proliferation, and augmented their role in angiogenesis, which suggests a new way for future clinical application of cell-based therapy. Published by Mosby, Inc.
Authors: Andrea Facciabene; Xiaohui Peng; Ian S Hagemann; Klara Balint; Andrea Barchetti; Li-Ping Wang; Phyllis A Gimotty; C Blake Gilks; Priti Lal; Lin Zhang; George Coukos Journal: Nature Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Birgit Assmus; Volker Schächinger; Claudius Teupe; Martina Britten; Ralf Lehmann; Natascha Döbert; Frank Grünwald; Alexandra Aicher; Carmen Urbich; Hans Martin; Dieter Hoelzer; Stefanie Dimmeler; Andreas M Zeiher Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-12-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Connie Y Chang; Angel T Chan; Patrick A Armstrong; Hong-Chang Luo; Takahiro Higuchi; Iossif A Strehin; Styliani Vakrou; Xiaoping Lin; Sophia N Brown; Brian O'Rourke; Theodore P Abraham; Richard L Wahl; Charles J Steenbergen; Jennifer H Elisseeff; M Roselle Abraham Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2012-08-13 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Bodo E Strauer; Michael Brehm; Tobias Zeus; Matthias Köstering; Anna Hernandez; Rüdiger V Sorg; Gesine Kögler; Peter Wernet Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S Fuchs; R Baffour; Y F Zhou; M Shou; A Pierre; F O Tio; N J Weissman; M B Leon; S E Epstein; R Kornowski Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sanjiv Dhingra; Peng Li; Xi-Ping Huang; Jian Guo; Jun Wu; Anton Mihic; Shu-Hong Li; Wang-Fu Zang; Daniel Shen; Richard D Weisel; Pawan K Singal; Ren-Ke Li Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Lee Carpenter; Carolyn Carr; Cheng Tao Yang; Daniel J Stuckey; Kieran Clarke; Suzanne M Watt Journal: Stem Cells Dev Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 3.272
Authors: Henry W Caplan; Karthik S Prabhakara; Naama E Toledano Furman; Soheil Zorofchian; Akshita Kumar; Cecilia Martin; Hasen Xue; Scott D Olson; Charles S Cox Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2020-12-31 Impact factor: 6.277
Authors: Qiang Fu; Ning Ning Tang; Qian Zhang; Yi Liu; Jia Chen Peng; Ning Fang; Li Mei Yu; Jin Wei Liu; Tao Zhang Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 2.759