Literature DB >> 25052695

An experimental method for the assessment of color simulation tools.

Julio Lillo1, Leticia Alvaro1, Humberto Moreira1.   

Abstract

The Simulcheck method for evaluating the accuracy of color simulation tools in relation to dichromats is described and used to test three color simulation tools: Variantor, Coblis, and Vischeck. A total of 10 dichromats (five protanopes, five deuteranopes) and 10 normal trichromats participated in the current study. Simulcheck includes two psychophysical tasks: the Pseudoachromatic Stimuli Identification task and the Minimum Achromatic Contrast task. The Pseudoachromatic Stimuli Identification task allows determination of the two chromatic angles (h(uv) values) that generate a minimum response in the yellow–blue opponent mechanism and, consequently, pseudoachromatic stimuli (greens or reds). The Minimum Achromatic Contrast task requires the selection of the gray background that produces minimum contrast (near zero change in the achromatic mechanism) for each pseudoachromatic stimulus selected in the previous task (L(R) values). Results showed important differences in the colorimetric transformations performed by the three evaluated simulation tools and their accuracy levels. Vischeck simulation accurately implemented the algorithm of Brettel, Viénot, and Mollon (1997). Only Vischeck appeared accurate (similarity in huv and L(R) values between real and simulated dichromats) and, consequently, could render reliable color selections. It is concluded that Simulcheck is a consistent method because it provided an equivalent pattern of results for huv and L(R) values irrespective of the stimulus set used to evaluate a simulation tool. Simulcheck was also considered valid because real dichromats provided expected huv and LR values when performing the two psychophysical tasks included in this method.
© 2014 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computer simulation; dichromacy; forced choice; optical simulation; psychophysics; red–green color blindness; simulation tools evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25052695     DOI: 10.1167/14.8.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  5 in total

1.  Color preference in red-green dichromats.

Authors:  Leticia Álvaro; Humberto Moreira; Julio Lillo; Anna Franklin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  ColourSpot, a novel gamified tablet-based test for accurate diagnosis of color vision deficiency in young children.

Authors:  Teresa Tang; Leticia Álvaro; James Alvarez; John Maule; Alice Skelton; Anna Franklin; Jenny Bosten
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-08-31

3.  Color-discrimination threshold determination using pseudoisochromatic test plates.

Authors:  Kaiva Jurasevska; Maris Ozolinsh; Sergejs Fomins; Ausma Gutmane; Brigita Zutere; Anete Pausus; Varis Karitans
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-27

4.  Coloured filters can simulate colour deficiency in normal vision but cannot compensate for congenital colour vision deficiency.

Authors:  Leticia Álvaro; João M M Linhares; Monika A Formankiewicz; Sarah J Waugh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Assessing the impact of color blindness on the ability of identifying benign and malignant skin lesions by naked-eye examination.

Authors:  Mutasem Elfalah; Nesrin Sulyman; Anas Alrwashdeh; Sari Al Hajaj; Sonia Alrawashdeh; Asad Al-Rawashdeh; Saif Aldeen AlRyalat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.