Literature DB >> 25052252

What can we learn about visual attention to multiple words from the word-word interference task?

Claudio Mulatti1, Lisa Ceccherini, Max Coltheart.   

Abstract

In this work, we develop an empirically driven model of visual attention to multiple words using the word-word interference (WWI) task. In this task, two words are simultaneously presented visually: a to-be-ignored distractor word at fixation, and a to-be-read-aloud target word above or below the distractor word. Experiment 1 showed that low-frequency distractor words interfere more than high-frequency distractor words. Experiment 2 showed that distractor frequency (high vs. low) and target frequency (high vs. low) exert additive effects. Experiment 3 showed that the effect of the case status of the target (same vs. AlTeRnAtEd) interacts with the type of distractor (word vs. string of # marks). Experiment 4 showed that targets are responded to faster in the presence of semantically related distractors than in presence of unrelated distractors. Our model of visual attention to multiple words borrows two principles governing processing dynamics from the dual-route cascaded model of reading: cascaded interactive activation and lateral inhibition. At the core of the model are three mechanisms aimed at dealing with the distinctive feature of the WWI task, which is that two words are presented simultaneously. These mechanisms are identification, tokenization, and deactivation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25052252     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-014-0450-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  24 in total

1.  Naming the color of a word: is it responses or task sets that compete?

Authors:  S Monsell; T J Taylor; K Murphy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

Review 2.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Seriality of phonological encoding in naming objects and reading their names.

Authors:  Ardi Roelofs
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-03

4.  Speed of processing explains the picture-word asymmetry in conditional naming.

Authors:  Claudio Mulatti; Lorella Lotto; Francesca Peressotti; Remo Job
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-12

5.  Neural encoding of relative position.

Authors:  Kenneth J Hayworth; Mark D Lescroart; Irving Biederman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Types and tokens in visual processing: a double dissociation between the attentional blink and repetition blindness.

Authors:  M M Chun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming.

Authors:  W La Heij
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-09

8.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Repetition blindness: type recognition without token individuation.

Authors:  N G Kanwisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-11

10.  Early extraction of meaning from pictures and its relation to conscious identification.

Authors:  C McCauley; C M Parmelee; R D Sperber; T H Carr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  2 in total

1.  Distinguishing Target From Distractor in Stroop, Picture-Word, and Word-Word Interference Tasks.

Authors:  Xenia Schmalz; Barbara Treccani; Claudio Mulatti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-15

2.  The role of the sound of objects in object identification: evidence from picture naming.

Authors:  Claudio Mulatti; Barbara Treccani; Remo Job
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.