Literature DB >> 25051311

Physician's preference-based instrumental variable analysis: is it valid and useful in a moderate-sized study?

Anna G C Boef1, Judith van Paassen, M Sesmu Arbous, Arno Middelkoop, Jan P Vandenbroucke, Saskia le Cessie, Olaf M Dekkers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Instrumental variable methods can potentially circumvent the unmeasured confounding inherent in observational data analyses.
METHODS: We investigated the validity and usefulness of physician's preference instrumental variable analysis in the setting of a moderate-sized clinical study. Using routine care data from 476 elective cardiac surgery patients, we assessed the effect of preoperative corticosteroids on mechanical ventilation time and duration of intensive care and hospital stay, occurrence of infections, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and delirium.
RESULTS: Although results of the physician's preference-based instrumental variable analysis corresponded in direction to results of a recent large randomized trial of the same therapy, the instrumental variable estimates showed much larger effects with very wide confidence intervals.
CONCLUSION: The lesser statistical precision limits the usefulness of instrumental variable analysis in a study that might be of sufficient size for conventional analyses, even if a strong and plausible instrument is available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25051311     DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  6 in total

1.  Toward a clearer portrayal of confounding bias in instrumental variable applications.

Authors:  John W Jackson; Sonja A Swanson
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Estimating ICU Benefit: A Randomized Study of Physicians.

Authors:  Thomas S Valley; Andrew J Admon; Darin B Zahuranec; Allan Garland; Angela Fagerlin; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Confounding in observational studies based on large health care databases: problems and potential solutions - a primer for the clinician.

Authors:  Mette Nørgaard; Vera Ehrenstein; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.790

4.  Survival after radiotherapy versus radical cystectomy for primary muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A Swedish nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Christel Häggström; Hans Garmo; Xavier de Luna; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Karin Söderkvist; Firas Aljabery; Viveka Ströck; Abolfazl Hosseini; Truls Gårdmark; Per-Uno Malmström; Staffan Jahnson; Fredrik Liedberg; Lars Holmberg
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Instrumental variable analysis to estimate treatment effects: a simulation study showing potential benefits of conditioning on hospital.

Authors:  I E Ceyisakar; N van Leeuwen; E W Steyerberg; H F Lingsma
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.612

6.  Thrombocytopenia and bleeding in myelosuppressed transfusion-dependent patients: a simulation study exploring underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  Rutger A Middelburg; Jean-Louis H Kerkhoffs; Johanna G van der Bom
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.790

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.