| Literature DB >> 25051169 |
Guillermo Castillo1, Laura L Cruz1, Rosalinda Tapia-López1, Erika Olmedo-Vicente, Eika Olmedo-Vicente1, Diego Carmona1, Ana Luisa Anaya-Lang2, Juan Fornoni1, Guadalupe Andraca-Gómez1, Pedro L Valverde3, Juan Núñez-Farfán1.
Abstract
Selection exerted by herbivores is a major force driving the evolution of plant defensive characters such as leaf trichomes or secondary metabolites. However, plant defense expression is highly variable among populations and identifying the sources of this variation remains a major challenge. Plant populations are often distributed across broad geographic ranges and are exposed to different herbivore communities, ranging from generalists (that feed on diverse plant species) to specialists (that feed on a restricted group of plants). We studied eight populations of the plant Datura stramonium usually eaten by specialist or generalist herbivores, in order to examine whether the pattern of phenotypic selection on secondary compounds (atropine and scopolamine) and a physical defense (trichome density) can explain geographic variation in these traits. Following co-evolutionary theory, we evaluated whether a more derived alkaloid (scopolamine) confers higher fitness benefits than its precursor (atropine), and whether this effect differs between specialist and generalist herbivores. Our results showed consistent directional selection in almost all populations and herbivores to reduce the concentration of atropine. The most derived alkaloid (scopolamine) was favored in only one of the populations, which is dominated by a generalist herbivore. In general, the patterns of selection support the existence of a selection mosaic and accounts for the positive correlation observed between atropine concentration and plant damage by herbivores recorded in previous studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25051169 PMCID: PMC4106780 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102478
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Datura stramonium populations sampled in Central Mexico (See Table S1).
Selection differentials (S) of trichome density, atropine, and scopolamine concentration in eight populations of Datura stramonium.
| Population | Main herbivore | Defensive trait |
|
|
|
|
| Acolman (N = 31) |
| Trichome density | 0.116 | 0.192 | 0.604 | 0.55 |
| Atropine |
|
|
|
| ||
| Scopolamine | −0.089 | 0.197 | −0.456 | 0.652 | ||
| Patria Nueva (N = 30) |
| Trichome density | −0.197 | 0.103 | −1.905 | 0.067 |
| Atropine | −0.183 | 0.104 | −1.753 | 0.09 | ||
| Scopolamine |
|
|
|
| ||
| Joquicingo (N = 31) |
| Trichome density | −0.234 | 0.184 | −1.277 | 0.211 |
| Atropine | −0.303 | 0.187 | −1.62 | 0.116 | ||
| Scopolamine | −0.036 | 0.195 | −0.186 | 0.854 | ||
| San Martín (N = 29) |
| Trichome density | 0.205 | 0.151 | 1.36 | 0.186 |
| Atropine |
|
|
|
| ||
| Scopolamine | −0.106 | 0.154 | −0.685 | 0.499 | ||
| Tzin Tzun Tzan (N = 30) |
| Trichome density |
|
|
|
|
| Atropine | −0.151 | 0.122 | −1.233 | 0.228 | ||
| Scopolamine | 0.107 | 0.128 | 0.837 | 0.41 | ||
| Valsequillo (N = 33) |
| Trichome density | −0.051 | 0.099 | −0.552 | 0.605 |
| Atropine |
|
|
|
| ||
| Scopolamine | −0.052 | 0.099 | −0.533 | 0.598 | ||
| Sanabria (N = 34) |
| Trichome density | −0.188 | 0.187 | −1.004 | 0.324 |
| Atropine | −0.228 | 0.178 | −1.281 | 0.209 | ||
| Scopolamine | −0.071 | 0.182 | −0.39 | 0.699 | ||
| Santo Domingo (N = 30) |
| Trichome density | −0.083 | 0.204 | −0.409 | 0.686 |
| Atropine |
|
|
|
| ||
| Scopolamine |
|
|
|
|
Significant values appear in bold-type fonts. Standard error (SE) of estimates, t-test value, and probability (P) are provided.
Multiple regression analyses to estimate linear selection gradients (β) for trichome density, atropine, and scopolamine concentration in eight populations of Datura stramonium.
| Population | Main herbivore | Defensive trait |
| SE |
|
|
| Acolman (N = 31) |
| Trichome density | −0.014 | 0.174 | −0.08 | 0.937 |
| Atropine |
|
|
|
| ||
| Scopolamine |
|
|
|
| ||
| Patria Nueva (N = 30) |
| Trichome density | −0.096 | 0.124 | −0.778 | 0.444 |
| Atropine | −0.068 | 0.13 | −0.526 | 0.603 | ||
| Scopolamine | −0.178 | 0.153 | −1.163 | 0.255 | ||
| Joquicingo (N = 31) |
| Trichome density | −0.194 | 0.196 | −0.992 | 0.33 |
| Atropine | −0.258 | 0.196 | −1.318 | 0.199 | ||
| Scopolamine | 0.038 | 0.197 | 0.19 | 0.851 | ||
| San Martín (N = 29) |
| Trichome density |
|
|
|
|
| Atropine |
|
|
|
| ||
| Scopolamine | 0.291 | 0.178 | 1.631 | 0.115 | ||
| Tzin Tzun Tzan (N = 30) |
| Trichome density |
|
|
|
|
| Atropine | −0.208 | 0.14 | −1.49 | 0.149 | ||
| Scopolamine | 0.253 | 0.132 | 1.908 | 0.068 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Valsequillo (N = 33) | Trichome density | −0.009 | 0.089 | −0.104 | 0.917 | |
| Atropine |
|
|
|
| ||
| Scopolamine | 0.166 | 0.113 | 1.47 | 0.152 | ||
| Sanabria (N = 34) |
| Trichome density | −0.189 | 0.2 | −0.945 | 0.353 |
| Atropine | −0.335 | 0.222 | −1.507 | 0.143 | ||
| Scopolamine | 0.17 | 0.231 | 0.739 | 0.466 | ||
| Santo Domingo (N = 30) |
| Trichome density |
|
|
|
|
| Atropine | −0.012 | 0.014 | −0.82 | 0.419 | ||
| Scopolamine | −0.018 | 0.013 | −1.374 | 0.181 |
Significant gradients appear in bold-type fonts. Standard error (SE) of estimates, t-test value, and probability (P) are provided.
Figure 2Forest plot showing the mean effect size for standardized selection differentials (S) of each defensive trait and corresponding confidence interval at 95%.
Different colors and forms denote different species of herbivores: Tangerine squares: Lema daturaphila; black circles: Epitrix parvula, and purple diamonds: Sphenarium purpurascens. Corresponding values are reported in Table S3.