Literature DB >> 25050853

Strategies influence neural activity for feedback learning across child and adolescent development.

Sabine Peters1, P Cédric M P Koolschijn2, Eveline A Crone3, Anna C K Van Duijvenvoorde4, Maartje E J Raijmakers5.   

Abstract

Learning from feedback is an important aspect of executive functioning that shows profound improvements during childhood and adolescence. This is accompanied by neural changes in the feedback-learning network, which includes pre-supplementary motor area (pre- SMA)/anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), superior parietal cortex (SPC), and the basal ganglia. However, there can be considerable differences within age ranges in performance that are ascribed to differences in strategy use. This is problematic for traditional approaches of analyzing developmental data, in which age groups are assumed to be homogenous in strategy use. In this study, we used latent variable models to investigate if underlying strategy groups could be detected for a feedback-learning task and whether there were differences in neural activation patterns between strategies. In a sample of 268 participants between ages 8 to 25 years, we observed four underlying strategy groups, which were cut across age groups and varied in the optimality of executive functioning. These strategy groups also differed in neural activity during learning; especially the most optimal performing group showed more activity in DLPFC, SPC and pre-SMA/ACC compared to the other groups. However, age differences remained an important contributor to neural activation, even when correcting for strategy. These findings contribute to the debate of age versus performance predictors of neural development, and highlight the importance of studying individual differences in strategy use when studying development.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescence; Development; Feedback; Strategy; fMRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25050853     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  10 in total

1.  Neurobiological responses in the adolescent striatum to being 'tested'.

Authors:  Samantha DePasque; Adriana Galván
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Frontostriatal White Matter Integrity Predicts Development of Delay of Gratification: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Michelle Achterberg; Jiska S Peper; Anna C K van Duijvenvoorde; René C W Mandl; Eveline A Crone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Learning With and Without Feedback in Children With Developmental Language Disorder.

Authors:  Yael Arbel; Isabel Fitzpatrick; Xinyi He
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Feedback associated with expectation for larger-reward improves visuospatial working memory performances in children with ADHD.

Authors:  Rubi Hammer; Michael Tennekoon; Gillian E Cooke; Jessica Gayda; Mark A Stein; James R Booth
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 6.464

5.  Longitudinal development of frontoparietal activity during feedback learning: Contributions of age, performance, working memory and cortical thickness.

Authors:  Sabine Peters; Anna C K Van Duijvenvoorde; P Cédric M P Koolschijn; Eveline A Crone
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 6.464

6.  Want More? Learn Less: Motivation Affects Adolescents Learning from Negative Feedback.

Authors:  Yun Zhuang; Wenfeng Feng; Yu Liao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-27

7.  Different Electrophysiological Responses to Informative Value of Feedback Between Children and Adults.

Authors:  Bin Du; Bihua Cao; Weiqi He; Fuhong Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-03

8.  Encouraging performance monitoring promotes proactive control in children.

Authors:  Lauren V Hadley; Frantzy Acluche; Nicolas Chevalier
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2019-06-14

9.  Functional neuroimaging of visuospatial working memory tasks enables accurate detection of attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Rubi Hammer; Gillian E Cooke; Mark A Stein; James R Booth
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  Peers and parents: a comparison between neural activation when winning for friends and mothers in adolescence.

Authors:  Barbara R Braams; Eveline A Crone
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.436

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.