Literature DB >> 25050535

Assessment of mutagenic potential of pyrolysis biochars by Ames Salmonella/mammalian-microsomal mutagenicity test.

Reshma Anjum1, Niclas Krakat2, M Toufiq Reza2, Michael Klocke2.   

Abstract

Biochar is of raising interest in sustainable biomass utilization concepts. Particularly biochar derived from pyrolysis attaches important agricultural capacities mandatory for an improved carbon sequestration, soil fertility and amelioration, respectively. In fact, large scale field trials and commercial business with biochar materials have already been started but still only few are known about the mutagenic potential of biochars produced. In this study hemp bedding and wood pellet biomass were used for biochar production by pyrolysis. The total concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were 34.9µgg(-1) of dry mass and 33.7µgg(-1) of dry mass for hemp biochar and wood biochar, respectively. The concentration of PAHs in tar produced during wood carbonization was 17.4µgg(-1). The concentrations of phenolic compounds were 55µgg(-1) and 8.3µgg(-1) for hemp and wood biochar, respectively. Salmonella/microsomal mutagenicity tests (i.e. Ames test) revealed a maximum mutagenicity for hemp biochar extracts with strains TA97, TA98 and TA100 in the presence and absence of liver microsomal fractions, respectively. Wood biochar and tar extract exhibited maximum mutagenicity with strains TA98 and T100 both in the presence and absence of liver microsomal fraction. The reversion of the applied tester strains increased in the presence and absence of liver microsomal fractions with an increasing dose of hemp biochar extract up to 2µl per plate and decreased at a concentration of 2.5µl per plate. For wood biochar and tar extracts, reversion of tester strains increased both in the presence and absence of S9 at extract concentrations of 4µl per plate and declined at a dose of 8µl per plate. By this study a significant higher mutagenic potential for hemp biochar compared to wood biochar and tar could be observed suggesting careful application in soil melioration.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ames test; Biochar; Mutagenic potential; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Pyrolysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25050535     DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  7 in total

1.  Decrease in the genotoxicity of metal-contaminated soils with biochar amendments.

Authors:  Frédéric Rees; Adrien Dhyèvre; Jean Louis Morel; Sylvie Cotelle
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Genotoxicity assessments of alluvial soil irrigated with wastewater from a pesticide manufacturing industry.

Authors:  Reshma Anjum; Niclas Krakat
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Composition of PAHs in Biochar and Implications for Biochar Production.

Authors:  Wolfram Buss; Isabel Hilber; Margaret C Graham; Ondřej Mašek
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 9.224

Review 4.  Feasibility of biochar application on a landfill final cover-a review on balancing ecology and shallow slope stability.

Authors:  Xun-Wen Chen; James Tsz-Fung Wong; Charles Wang-Wai Ng; Ming-Hung Wong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Cellular Mutagenicity and Heavy Metal Concentrations of Leachates Extracted from the Fly and Bottom Ash Derived from Municipal Solid Waste Incineration.

Authors:  Po-Wen Chen; Zhen-Shu Liu; Min-Jie Wun; Tai-Chen Kuo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Mutagenic Study of Benzimidazole Derivatives with (+S9) and without (-S9) Metabolic Activation.

Authors:  Nurul Hafizan Azahar; Siti Soleha Ab Dullah; Rozaini Abdullah; Norizan Ahmat; Abdah Md Akim; Hasiah Ab Hamid
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Evaluation of Dosidicus gigas Skin Extract as An Antioxidant and Preservative in Tuna Pâté.

Authors:  Jesús Enrique Chan-Higuera; Josafat Marina Ezquerra-Brauer; Leontina Lipan; Marina Cano-Lamadrid; Roberta Rizzitano; Angel Antonio Carbonell-Barrachina
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2019-12-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.