Literature DB >> 25050199

The microbiome modulates the tumor macroenvironment.

Susan E Erdman1, Theofilos Poutahidis2.   

Abstract

Earlier investigations of the tumor microenvironment unveiled systemic networks presenting novel therapeutic opportunities. It has been recently shown that gut microbes modulate whole host immune and neuroendocrine factors impacting the fate of distant preneoplastic lesions toward malignancy or regression. These findings establish a new paradigm of holobiont therapeutic engineering in emerging tumor macroenvironments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beneficial microbes; carcinogenesis; microbiome; regulatory T cells; tumor macroenvironment

Year:  2014        PMID: 25050199      PMCID: PMC4063141          DOI: 10.4161/onci.28271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


The Tumor Environment School of Thought

At the dawn of the new millennium, Hanahan and Weinberg (2000) predicted that the future of cancer research would be shaped primarily by conceptual rather than technical advances. The solidification and enrichment of the tumor microenvironment concept has proven this assumption to be valid. It has become increasingly clear that neoplastic diseases cannot be entirely understood by examining stroma and genetics of cancer cells independently. The dynamic interrelationship of cancer with the host environment must be studied as well. The bulk of cancer research performed over the past decade has revealed that the tumor microenvironment contributes to neoplastic disease progression, invasion, and metastasis. Recent findings in mice, however, take this notion further by showing that many tumors are less autonomous than previously thought. These include the surprising observations that expansive and invasive tumors regressed in the absence of systemic inflammatory stimuli. Other intriguing findings have shown that the milieu of immune cells and factors in the whole host environment determine the fate of dysplastic and preneoplastic lesions toward tumorigenesis or regression. This systemic modulation of neoplastic disease may be best described as the “tumor-macroenvironment.”

The Immune System Shapes the Tumor Environment

Using Paget’s “seed and soil” paradigm, whereby the “seed” is the initially transformed cancer cell and the “soil” is its tissue environment, the latter could either foster or attenuate the carcinogenic process. Neoplastic outcome has been found to largely depend upon coinciding systematic immune-related events., Such correlations lead one to wonder about potential parallels between systemic immunity and the fact that people commonly bear early neoplastic lesions throughout their body, yet few actually develop cancer. The high frequency of precancerous lesions with malignant potential is not surprising, since it has been estimated that each human gene could be mutated up to 1010 times during a person's lifetime, even in the absence of environmental mutagenic factors. It follows that since these seeds are inevitable, altering the soil remains as the viable target to affect cancer growth. The immune system, comprising cellular elements and secreted factors that convey powerful signals to preserve homeostasis, may rise to meet this objective. Indeed, the immune system of mice has been shown to influence the risk of developing sporadic cancers in various epithelia throughout the body. The critical question, then, is whether efficient and biologically safe modalities harnessing the power of the immune system may serve to suppress carcinogenic processes throughout the body.

Gut Microbes Help Define the Tumor Macroenvironment

Interestingly, we have discovered that clinically silent gastrointestinal (GI) tract immune networks are integrated with gut microbiota to impart healthful phenotypes and suppress age-related pathologies and distal carcinogenic processes such as those occurring in the mammary and prostate glands.,- These effects, achievable by feeding food-grade bacteria to mice, culminated from the interplay between the systemic immune system and metabolic processes (Fig. 1)., Consuming certain microbes and their products imparts downstream homeostatic health effects that overcome therapeutic limitations of exogenous administrations of discrete immune or hormonal factors. These findings open up new cancer prevention or therapeutic avenues. Further, our findings put cancer into a new broader context, the so-called “holobiont,” comprised of the mammalian host plus resident microbes.,

Figure 1. Gut bacteria-host crosstalk is continuous and reciprocal in the cancer macroenvironment. Beneficial microbes trigger IL-10-mediated gastrointestinal (GI)-tract immune and neuronal networks that lower systemic inflammatory tone and upregulate hypothalamic-hypophyseal targets, including the neuropeptide hormone oxytocin, constituting a systemic gut-immune-endocrine axis. Oxytocin upregulates systemic interferon-γ (IFNγ) expression culminating in robust yet tightly regulated host immunity. Thus, neoplastic development and growth is framed in the context of the holobiont, including native resident microbes or those we may choose to engineer, soliciting a new broader concept of the cancer macroenvironment.

Figure 1. Gut bacteria-host crosstalk is continuous and reciprocal in the cancer macroenvironment. Beneficial microbes trigger IL-10-mediated gastrointestinal (GI)-tract immune and neuronal networks that lower systemic inflammatory tone and upregulate hypothalamic-hypophyseal targets, including the neuropeptide hormone oxytocin, constituting a systemic gut-immune-endocrine axis. Oxytocin upregulates systemic interferon-γ (IFNγ) expression culminating in robust yet tightly regulated host immunity. Thus, neoplastic development and growth is framed in the context of the holobiont, including native resident microbes or those we may choose to engineer, soliciting a new broader concept of the cancer macroenvironment.

GI Tract Bacteria Affect the Immunological and Metabolic Profile of the Host

The significance of the GI tract microbiota in the development of a potent and balanced immune system occurring during mammalian early life is now appreciated., The “hygiene hypothesis” concept involves insufficient microbial exposures early in life that predispose the individual to uncontrollable inflammation-associated pathologies later in life.,, Recent data suggest that this GI bacteria-host crosstalk is continuous and reciprocal throughout life, constituting a vast gut-immune-endocrine-brain signaling axis.- Our prior studies in mice using an opportunistic pathogen, Helicobacter hepaticus, a bacterium which colonizes the lower bowel, provided experimental evidence for the first 2 elements of this axis. Indeed, H. hepaticus induced clinically silent systemic elevations of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as Interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-17 that fuel carcinogenesis in tissues distal from the colon, including mammary and prostate glands. Our more recent studies using the probiotic microbe Lactobacillus reuteri completes the puzzle of the aforementioned axis to include the endocrine system and the brain by showing beneficial microbe-induced, IL-10-mediated GI-tract immune networks that lower systemic inflammatory tone, and upregulate hypothalamic-hypophyseal hormones including oxytocin. Oxytocin modulates interferon- γ (IFNγ) and CD25 expression culminating in robust yet tightly regulated immunity. As a consequence of eating probiotic organisms, aged mice displayed superb wound healing capacity., In this setting, mice were also resistant to both western diet-induced and ErbB2 oncogene overexpression-associated mammary carcinogenesis.

Regulatory T cells Are Essential for Constructive GI Bacteria-host Signaling

Although immune-deficient mice colonized with H. hepaticus exist in a chronic, smoldering pro-inflammatory and pro-tumorigenic state, their wild-type immune-competent counterparts are more resistant to neoplasms due to microbe-induced regulatory T cells (Tregs) with potent anti-inflammatory and anti-neoplastic properties. Elaborate adoptive cell transfer experiments have demonstrated similar beneficial outcomes with L. reuteri habitation involving IFNγ in an IL-10-dependent manner that counteracts carcinogenic processes.,, These results suggest that exposures to bacteria may be used therapeutically for epigenetic control of resident Treg populations.

Conclusions

Taken together, these findings offer exciting new microbial avenues for developing population-based or personalized medical strategies to decrease the risk of malignancy. Further, as the tumor microenvironment concept first put cancer cells into context within a lesion,, the tumor macroenvironment puts carcinogenesis into a whole-body context that extends beyond the mammalian host to microbial passengers we may choose to engineer for therapeutic benefit.
  10 in total

Review 1.  The hallmarks of cancer.

Authors:  D Hanahan; R A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-01-07       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Cancer without disease.

Authors:  Judah Folkman; Raghu Kalluri
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The gut microbiota-a clinical perspective on lessons learned.

Authors:  Fergus Shanahan
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 4.  Reciprocal interactions of the intestinal microbiota and immune system.

Authors:  Craig L Maynard; Charles O Elson; Robin D Hatton; Casey T Weaver
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Accessories to the crime: functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Douglas Hanahan; Lisa M Coussens
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 6.  Putting tumours in context.

Authors:  M J Bissell; D Radisky
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 7.  Cancer inflammation and regulatory T cells.

Authors:  Susan E Erdman; Theofilos Poutahidis
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 8.  Breast cancer: should gastrointestinal bacteria be on our radar screen?

Authors:  Varada P Rao; Theofilos Poutahidis; James G Fox; Susan E Erdman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Microbial symbionts accelerate wound healing via the neuropeptide hormone oxytocin.

Authors:  Theofilos Poutahidis; Sean M Kearney; Tatiana Levkovich; Peimin Qi; Bernard J Varian; Jessica R Lakritz; Yassin M Ibrahim; Antonis Chatzigiagkos; Eric J Alm; Susan E Erdman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Beneficial bacteria stimulate host immune cells to counteract dietary and genetic predisposition to mammary cancer in mice.

Authors:  Jessica R Lakritz; Theofilos Poutahidis; Tatiana Levkovich; Bernard J Varian; Yassin M Ibrahim; Antonis Chatzigiagkos; Sheyla Mirabal; Eric J Alm; Susan E Erdman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 7.396

  10 in total
  13 in total

Review 1.  Gut microbiota modulate host immune cells in cancer development and growth.

Authors:  Susan E Erdman; Theofilos Poutahidis
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 7.376

Review 2.  Gut bacteria and cancer.

Authors:  Susan E Erdman; Theofilos Poutahidis
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-06-04

3.  Cholera-toxin suppresses carcinogenesis in a mouse model of inflammation-driven sporadic colon cancer.

Authors:  Michael Doulberis; Katerina Angelopoulou; Eleni Kaldrymidou; Anastasia Tsingotjidou; Zaphiris Abas; Suzan E Erdman; Theofilos Poutahidis
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 4.944

4.  Dietary microbes modulate transgenerational cancer risk.

Authors:  Theofilos Poutahidis; Bernard J Varian; Tatiana Levkovich; Jessica R Lakritz; Sheyla Mirabal; Caitlin Kwok; Yassin M Ibrahim; Sean M Kearney; Antonis Chatzigiagkos; Eric J Alm; Susan E Erdman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Immuno-reactive cancer organoid model to assess effects of the microbiome on cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Ethan Shelkey; David Oommen; Elizabeth R Stirling; David R Soto-Pantoja; Katherine L Cook; Yong Lu; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Shay Soker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Commensal bacteria modulate the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Theofilos Poutahidis; Susan E Erdman
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 7.  Human Microbiome Engineering: The Future and Beyond.

Authors:  Arunava Kali
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-09-01

Review 8.  Peptides as Quorum Sensing Molecules: Measurement Techniques and Obtained Levels In vitro and In vivo.

Authors:  Frederick Verbeke; Severine De Craemer; Nathan Debunne; Yorick Janssens; Evelien Wynendaele; Christophe Van de Wiele; Bart De Spiegeleer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 9.  Metabolic Reprogramming of Colorectal Cancer Cells and the Microenvironment: Implication for Therapy.

Authors:  Miljana Nenkov; Yunxia Ma; Nikolaus Gaßler; Yuan Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Microbiota-Derived Metabolites in Tumor Progression and Metastasis.

Authors:  Tania Rossi; Daniele Vergara; Francesca Fanini; Michele Maffia; Sara Bravaccini; Francesca Pirini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.