| Literature DB >> 25050020 |
M Boga1, S Yurtseven1, U Kilic2, S Aydemir3, T Polat4.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the nutritive value of some legume species in salt-affected soils of South-East Anatolian region using chemical composition and in vitro gas production kinetics. In this study, Lotus corniculatus, Trifolium alexandrinum, Medicago sativa were sown and tested in four different locations. A 3 by 4 factorial design with 3 legume species and 4 salt levels (non salty electrical conductivity (EC)<4 dS/m; low salt: 4 dS/m>EC<8 dS/m, medium saline: 8 dS/m>EC<16 dS/m and high salt: 16 dS/m>EC) was used in the study. Results indicated that salinity and plants had no significant effect on ash and ether extract. Dry matter (DM), acid detergent fiber, digestible dry matter, dry matter intake (DMI) were affected by plant, salinity and plant×salinity interaction. On the other hand neutral detergent fiber, relative feed value (RFV), and DMI were affected by salinity and plant×salinity interaction. Mineral contents were affected by plant species, salinity and salinity×plants interactions. In vitro gas production, their kinetics and estimated parameters such as were not affected by salinity whereas the gas production up to 48 h, organic matter digestibility, metabolizable energy (ME), and net energy lactation (NEL) were affected by plant and plant×salt interaction. Generally RFVs of all species ranged from 120 to 210 and were quite satisfactory in salty conditions. Current results show that the feed value of Medicago sativa is higher compared to Lotus corniculatus and Trifolium alexandrinum.Entities:
Keywords: Glycophyte Forages; In vitro Gas Production; Legume sp.; Relative Feed Value; Salt Stress
Year: 2014 PMID: 25050020 PMCID: PMC4093174 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13718
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Mineral components of legume plants cultivated from different salt-affected fields
| Mineral components(ppm) | Salinity level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Non-salty | Low salty | Medium salty | High salty | ||
| K | 18.6 | 19.3 | 13.8 | 11.5 | |
| Na | 144.6 | 138.4 | 172.7 | 150.5 | |
| Ca | 94.9 | 103.5 | 98.1 | 100.3 | |
| Mg | 16.3 | 32.5 | 30.8 | 29.1 | |
| K | 26.0 | 36.6 | 28.5 | 32.8 | |
| Na | 145.3 | 70.9 | 155.2 | 137.3 | |
| Ca | 105.9 | 134.5 | 81.3 | 102.2 | |
| Mg | 13.3 | 26.1 | 20.3 | 24.3 | |
| K | 9.0 | 12.7 | 19.5 | 17.8 | |
| Na | 140.0 | 126.7 | 168.1 | 171.4 | |
| Ca | 115.0 | 93.6 | 93.1 | 93.6 | |
| Mg | 15.7 | 23.3 | 20.9 | 21.1 | |
| SEM | 0.41 | 1.34 | 1.10 | 0.58 | |
| Legume species | |||||
| Salinity level | |||||
| Legume species×salinity level | |||||
SEM, standart error mean.
p<0.05;
p<0.01.
Chemical compositions, RFVs, DDMs and DMIs of samples used in the study
| Plants | Salinity | DM | NDF | ADF | Ash (%) | CP (%) | EE (%) | RFV | DDM | DMI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non salt | 92.5 | 44.5 | 40.5 | 10.8 | 14.9 | 2.4 | 120.1 | 57.3 | 2.7 | |
| Low salt | 92.9 | 44.2 | 37.2 | 11.4 | 17.6 | 2.9 | 126.7 | 59.9 | 2.7 | |
| Medium salt | 93.2 | 39.3 | 34.4 | 12.9 | 18.2 | 3.2 | 128.4 | 62.1 | 2.6 | |
| High salt | 92.0 | 29.9 | 27.5 | 13.3 | 18.9 | 2.5 | 210.2 | 67.5 | 4.1 | |
| Non salt | 94.9 | 34.8 | 31.5.5 | 12.2 | 19.9 | 2.1 | 167.2 | 65.8 | 3.4 | |
| Low salt | 94.4 | 42.4 | 32.7 | 11.7 | 17.6 | 2.0 | 139.2 | 63.5 | 2.8 | |
| Medium salt | 94.8 | 40.8 | 37.6 | 11.3 | 17.6 | 3.2 | 132.9 | 59.6 | 2.9 | |
| High salt | 94.2 | 43.6 | 36.7 | 13.1 | 20.3 | 2.9 | 128.6 | 60.3 | 2.8 | |
| Non salt | 94.6 | 39.7 | 32.6 | 11.7 | 22.4 | 2.0 | 153.2 | 63.2 | 3.1 | |
| Low salt | 93.3 | 39.9 | 32.1 | 10.9 | 22.8 | 2.6 | 149.8 | 63.9 | 3.0 | |
| Medium salt | 94.6 | 36.2 | 30.9 | 12.2 | 23.3 | 2.2 | 170.3 | 64.6 | 3.4 | |
| High salt | 92.4 | 36.2 | 30.6 | 11.6 | 22.6 | 2.7 | 169.1 | 65.1 | 3.3 | |
| SEM | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 3.3 | 0.5 | 0.05 | |
| Plants | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |||||
| Salinity | NS | NS | NS | |||||||
| Plants×salinity | NS | NS | NS |
RFV, relative feed value; DDM, digestible dry matter (% of body weight); DMI, dry matter intake (% of body weight); DM, dry matter; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; CP, crude protein; EE, ether extracts; SEM, standard error of means; NS, no significant differences.
p<0.05;
p<0.01.
Significance between individual means was identified using the Duncan’s multiple comparative tests.
In vitro gas production (mL) parameters and ME, NEL and OMD values of Legume species
| Plants | Salinity | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 24 | 48 | 72 | 96 | a | b | c | OMD | ME | NEL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non salt | 2.6 | 5.9 | 10.3 | 14.7 | 26.9 | 35.5 | 40.1 | 41.5 | −3.7 | 46.0 | 0.04 | 46.2 | 6.7 | 3.7 | |
| Low salt | 2.0 | 5.4 | 10.5 | 15.3 | 27.7 | 38.5 | 41.6 | 43.1 | −5.2 | 49.1 | 0.05 | 48.2 | 7.0 | 4.0 | |
| Medium salt | 5.5 | 8.9 | 13.9 | 18.8 | 31.2 | 40.3 | 44.3 | 45.9 | −1.5 | 47.1 | 0.05 | 51.6 | 7.5 | 4.4 | |
| High salt | 2.5 | 5.8 | 10.0 | 14.2 | 25.4 | 30.7 | 38.1 | 39.9 | −2.2 | 42.6 | 0.04 | 46.9 | 6.8 | 3.8 | |
| Non salt | 1.9+ | 5.2 | 10.0 | 14.7 | 26.9 | 37.0 | 40.0 | 41.5 | −5.0 | 47.2 | 0.05 | 48.3 | 7.0 | 3.9 | |
| Low salt | 6.0+ | 8.7 | 13.7 | 18.5 | 30.5 | 39.4 | 43.7 | 45.3 | −0.8 | 46.6 | 0.04 | 51.7 | 7.6 | 4.3 | |
| Medium salt | 2.4 | 5.7 | 9.8 | 13.8 | 27.7 | 29.8 | 37.1 | 38.8 | −2.1 | 41.5 | 0.04 | 45.5 | 6.6 | 3.7 | |
| High salt | 2.1 | 5.5 | 10.8 | 15.5 | 28.2 | 38.8 | 42.1 | 43.6 | −5.3 | 49.5 | 0.05 | 49.5 | 7.2 | 4.2 | |
| Non salt | 5.8 | 8.9 | 13.9 | 18.7 | 31.0 | 40.2 | 44.1 | 45.8 | −1.2 | 47.4 | 0.04 | 53.3 | 7.7 | 4.5 | |
| Low salt | 2.5 | 5.8 | 10.1 | 14.4 | 26.3 | 34.6 | 39.1 | 40.6 | −3.6 | 44.9 | 0.04 | 49.3 | 7.1 | 4.1 | |
| Medium salt | 1.9 | 5.7 | 10.0 | 14.8 | 26.7 | 37.1 | 40.1 | 41.6 | −5.0 | 47.4 | 0.05 | 49.9 | 7.2 | 4.1 | |
| High salt | 5.9 | 9.1 | 14.3 | 19.1 | 31.8 | 41.0 | 45.2 | 46.8 | −1.3 | 48.5 | 0.04 | 54.1 | 7.8 | 4.7 | |
| SEM | 0.2 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.001 | 0.2 | 0.03 | 0.02 | |
| Plants | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||||||||||
| Salinity | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Plants×salinity |
ME, metabolizable energy; NEL, net energy lactation; OMD, organic matter digestibility; a, the gas production from the immediately soluble fraction (mL); b, the gas production from the insoluble fraction (mL); c, the gas production rate constant for the insoluble fraction (mL/h); SEM, standard error of means; NS, no significant differences.
p<0.05;
p<0.01.
Significances between individual means were identified.
Chemical compositions of forage and concentrate fed to animals
| Feeds | DM (g/kg) | CP | EE | CF | Ash | NDF | ADF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ——— g/kg DM ——— | |||||||
| Forage (Corn silage) | 318.3 | 105.7 | 35.1 | 236.1 | 88.8 | 453.6 | 296.1 |
| Concentrates | 907.9 | 281.4 | 44.3 | 96.2 | 60.7 | 266.9 | 93.4 |
DM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; EE, ether extracts; NDF, neutral detergent fiber, ADF, acid detergent fiber.