| Literature DB >> 25050004 |
Rahman Md Mizanur1, Hyeonho Yun2, M Moniruzzaman2, F Ferreira2, Kang-Woong Kim3, Sungchul C Bai2.
Abstract
Three feeding trials were conducted to evaluate the effects of feeding rate and water temperature on growth and body composition of juvenile Korean rockfish, Sebastes schlegeli rearing at 3 different water temperatures. A total of 270 fish (each experiment) individual body weight (BW) averaging 16±0.3 g (mean±SD) were fed a commercial diet for 4 wk at 16°C, 20°C, and 24°C. At each temperature, triplicate tanks were assigned to one of 6 feeding rates: 1.5%, 2.5%, 2.8%, 3.1%, 3.4%, and satiation (3.7% BW/d) at 16°C, 1.9%, 2.9%, 3.2%, 3.5%, 3.8% and satiation (4.1% BW/d) at 20°C and 1.7%, 2.7%, 3.0%, 3.3%, 3.6%, and satiation (3.9% BW/d) at 24°C water temperature. Weight gains of fish in satiation and 3.4% groups at 16°C, in satiation and 3.8% groups at 20°C and in satiation and 3.6% groups at 24°C were significantly higher than those of fish in the other treatments (p<0.05). A broken line regression analysis of weight gain indicated that optimum feeding rates of juvenile Korean rockfish were 3.41% at 16°C, 3.75% at 20°C and 3.34% at 24°C water temperature. Results of the present study indicate that the optimum feeding rate could be >3.1% but <3.41% at 16°C, >3.5% but <3.75% at 20°C and >3.0% but <3.34% at 24°C. As we expected results suggest that fish performed better at 20°C than 16°C or 24°C water temperature and the optimum feeding rate could be 3.1% BW/d to 3.7% BW/d in 16 g of juvenile Korean rockfish.Entities:
Keywords: Feeding Rate; Growth Performance; Juvenile Korean Rockfish; Sebastes schlegeli; Water Temperature
Year: 2014 PMID: 25050004 PMCID: PMC4093190 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13508
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Growth performance, whole-body proximate composition, morphological indices and serological characteristics of 16 g fish reared at 16°C water temperature1
| Item | Diets | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| 1.5% | 2.5% | 2.8% | 3.1% | 3.4% | SA | Pooled SEM | |
| Growth performance | |||||||
| WG | 41.74f | 61.72e | 70.18d | 80.86 | 85.27 | 87.11 | 4.09 |
| SGR | 1.43d | 2.02 | 2.21 | 2.47 | 2.57 | 2.61 | 0.11 |
| FE | 83.03d | 83.54d | 85.38 | 84.17 | 90.25 | 85.33 | 3.50 |
| PER | 1.72 | 1.76 | 1.77 | 1.81 | 2.02 | 1.82 | 0.06 |
| Survival | 97.42d | 98.34 | 97.85 | 98.41 | 100 | 97.61 | 0.12 |
| Whole-body proximate composition | |||||||
| Moisture | 72.74 | 71.64 | 73.73 | 74.93 | 71.72 | 72.47 | 0.61 |
| CP | 56.67 | 57.94 | 58.35 | 57.98 | 59.06 | 58.97 | 0.17 |
| Crude lipid | 19.58e | 20.00d | 19.94d | 20.95 | 22.48 | 21.93 | 0.32 |
| Crude ash | 16.30 | 16.41 | 17.36 | 16.49 | 17.99 | 17.22 | 0.26 |
| Morphological indices | |||||||
| CF | 1.11 | 1.73 | 1.74 | 1.77 | 1.83 | 1.85 | 0.07 |
| HSI | 3.70d | 3.73d | 4.24c | 4.37 | 4.60 | 4.79 | 0.11 |
| VSI | 11.71d | 12.27 | 13.26 | 13.63 | 14.73 | 15.16 | 0.32 |
| Serological characteristics | |||||||
| HCT | 31.73 | 31.63 | 33.87 | 32.77 | 31.27 | 33.07 | 0.22 |
| Hb | 4.17 | 4.00 | 4.07 | 4.07 | 4.23 | 4.00 | 0.02 |
| GOT | 51.77 | 51.47 | 50.67d | 51.17 | 50.78 | 51.53 | 0.24 |
| GPT | 11.47 | 11.40 | 10.83 | 11.37 | 11.43 | 11.27 | 0.16 |
Pooled SEM, pooled standard error of means: ; HCT, hematocrit (%); Hb, hemoglobin (g/dL); GOT, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (IU/L); GPT, glutamic pyruvic transaminase (IU/L).
Values are means from triplicate groups of fish where the values in each row with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05).
Satiation (3.7%) = Total feed weight (g)×100/total fish weight (g).
Weight gain (%) = (Final weight − initial weight)×100/initial weight.
Specific growth rate (%/d) = (Loge final wt − Loge initial wt)×100/d.
Feed efficiency (%) = Wet weight gain (g)×100/dry feed intake (g).
Protein efficiency ratio = Wet weight gain/protein intake.
Survival (%) = Number of fish at end of experiment×100/number of fish stocked.
Condition factor = Fish weight (g)×100/total length (cm3).
Hepatosomatic index = Liver weight (g)×100/fish weight (g).
Visceralsomatic index = Visceral weight×100/fish weight (g).
Within a row, means without a common letters (a, b, and c) differ (p<0.05).
Figure 1Broken line analysis of weight gain of 16 g juvenile Korean rockfish, reared at 16°C water temperature.
Growth performance, whole-body proximate composition, morphological indices and serological characteristics of 16 g fish reared at 20°C water temperature1
| Item | Diets | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| 1.9% | 2.9% | 3.2% | 3.5% | 3.8% | SA | Pooled SEM | |
| Growth performance | |||||||
| WG | 51.94f | 75.16e | 80.12d | 88.23 | 95.45 | 96.75 | 3.93 |
| SGR | 1.75d | 2.34 | 2.47 | 2.63 | 2.80 | 2.81 | 0.09 |
| FE | 87.63d | 88.49 | 89.25 | 99.53 | 87.53d | 79.55e | 3.56 |
| PER | 1.86 | 1.87 | 1.87 | 2.11 | 1.79 | 1.69 | 0.07 |
| Survival | 98.24 | 99.56 | 100 | 99.54 | 100 | 98.34 | 0.06 |
| Whole-body proximate composition | |||||||
| Moisture | 73.46 | 72.63d | 74.36d | 75.38 | 72.27d | 73.74 | 0.51 |
| CP | 55.46d | 57.54 | 56.56 | 58.58 | 60.12 | 59.95 | 0.16 |
| Crude lipid | 20.56d | 21.00 | 20.95 | 21.68 | 22.54 | 21.93 | 0.41 |
| Crude ash | 17.03 | 17.15 | 18.64 | 17.85 | 18.66 | 18.35 | 0.34 |
| Morphological indices | |||||||
| CF | 1.12 | 1.77 | 1.79 | 1.82 | 1.88 | 1.97 | 0.07 |
| HSI | 3.87 | 3.87 | 4.37 | 4.67 | 4.90 | 4.99 | 0.12 |
| VSI | 12.01d | 12.61 | 13.57 | 14.56 | 15.52 | 15.92 | 0.37 |
| Serological characteristics | |||||||
| HCT | 31.0 | 32.7 | 30.1 | 32.3 | 31.9 | 32.6 | 0.24 |
| Hb | 4.17 | 4.10 | 4.17 | 3.97 | 4.23 | 4.07 | 0.09 |
| GOT | 50.40 | 49.13 | 50.11 | 49.40 | 50.31 | 50.32 | 0.36 |
| GPT | 10.43 | 9.27 | 10.30 | 9.71 | 9.13 | 10.32 | 0.06 |
Pooled SEM, pooled standard error of means: ; HCT, hematocrit (%); Hb, hemoglobin (g/dL); GOT, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (IU/L); GPT, glutamic pyruvic transaminase (IU/L).
Values are means from triplicate groups of fish where the values in each row with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05).
Satiation (4.1%) = Total feed weight (g)×100/total fish weight (g).
Weight gain (%) = (Final weight − initial weight)×100/initial weight.
Specific growth rate (%/d) = (Loge final wt − Loge initial wt)×100/d.
Feed efficiency (%) = Wet weight gain (g)×100/dry feed intake (g).
Protein efficiency ratio = Wet weight gain/protein intake.
Survival (%) = Number of fish at end of experiment×100/Number of fish stocked.
Condition factor = Fish weight (g)×100/total length (cm3).
Hepatosomatic index = Liver weight (g)×100/fish weight (g).
Visceralsomatic index = Visceral weight×100/fish weight (g).
Within a row, means without a common letters (a, b, and c) differ (p<0.05).
Figure 2Broken line analysis of weight gain of 16 g juvenile Korean rockfish, reared at 20°C water temperature.
Growth performance, whole-body proximate composition, morphological indices and serological characteristics of 16 g fish reared at 24°C water temperature1
| Item | Diets | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| 1.7% | 2.7% | 3.0% | 3.3% | 3.6% | SA | Pooled SEM | |
| Growth performance | |||||||
| WG | 49.34 | 74.50 | 77.41 | 83.66 | 86.36 | 87.17 | 3.34 |
| SGR | 1.67 | 2.32 | 2.39 | 2.53 | 2.59 | 2.61 | 0.08 |
| FE | 80.21 | 81.27 | 84.62 | 93.12 | 85.66 | 80.70 | 1.51 |
| PER | 1.70 | 1.72 | 1.79 | 1.97 | 1.69 | 1.56 | 0.03 |
| Survival | 95.21 | 95.61 | 96.62 | 95.81 | 96.82 | 95.81 | 0.15 |
| Whole-body proximate composition | |||||||
| Moisture | 72.31 | 72.41 | 73.56 | 74.83 | 71.73 | 72.76 | 0.35 |
| CP | 54.36 | 56.55 | 55.97 | 57.76 | 58.42 | 58.59 | 0.14 |
| Crude lipid | 20.12 | 20.59 | 21.42 | 20.75 | 21.15 | 20.87 | 0.36 |
| Crude ash | 16.02 | 16.15 | 17.53 | 16.84 | 17.54 | 17.18 | 0.31 |
| Morphological indices | |||||||
| CF | 1.07 | 1.76 | 1.78 | 1.77 | 1.83 | 1.86 | 0.07 |
| HSI | 3.73 | 3.74 | 4.24 | 4.46 | 4.72 | 4.84 | 0.11 |
| VSI | 11.8 | 12.3 | 13.2 | 13.9 | 15.1 | 15.3 | 0.34 |
| Serological characteristics | |||||||
| HCT | 29.47 | 31.37 | 31.20 | 30.90 | 31.70 | 30.10 | 0.20 |
| Hb | 4.40 | 3.83 | 4.00 | 3.93 | 4.03 | 3.90 | 0.02 |
| GOT | 52.43 | 51.83 | 52.70 | 51.53 | 52.87 | 52.23 | 0.15 |
| GPT | 12.27 | 11.67 | 12.17 | 11.93 | 12.33 | 12.11 | 0.07 |
Pooled SEM, pooled standard error of means: ; HCT, hematocrit (%); Hb, hemoglobin (g/dL); GOT, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (IU/L); GPT, glutamic pyruvic transaminase (IU/L).
Values are means from triplicate groups of fish where the values in each row with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05).
Satiation (3.9%) = Total feed weight (g) ×100/total fish weight (g).
Weight gain (%) = (Final weight − initial weight) ×100/initial weight.
Specific growth rate (%/d) = (Loge final wt − Loge initial wt) ×100/d.
Feed efficiency (%) = Wet weight gain (g) ×100/dry feed intake (g).
Protein efficiency ratio = Wet weight gain/protein intake.
Survival (%) = Number of fish at end of experiment×00/number of fish stocked.
Condition factor = Fish weight (g)×100/total length (cm3).
Hepatosomatic index = Liver weight (g)×100/fish weight (g).
Visceralsomatic index = Visceral weight×100/fish weight (g).
Within a row, means without a common letters (a, b, and c) differ (p<0.05).
Figure 3Broken line analysis of weight gain of 16 g juvenile Korean rockfish, reared at 24°C water temperature.