| Literature DB >> 25049959 |
G O Ribeiro1, A M Teixeira2, F O Velasco2, W G Faria Júnior2, L G R Pereira3, A V Chaves4, L C Gonçalves2, T A McAllister5.
Abstract
Andropogon gayanus is an important grass due to its high biomass production, drought tolerance and favorable growth on low fertility acidic soils. Currently, there is little research on the impact of growth stage on the nutritional quality or the degree of CH4 production that may arise from this forage during ruminal fermentation. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of regrowth stage of A. gayanus on its chemical composition, in vitro production of gas and CH4, as well as in vitro dry matter (DM) digestibility when grown under tropical Brazilian conditions and conserved as hay or as silage. The nutritional value of A. gayanus grass declined with increasing maturity; however digestible DM yield linearly increased. After 112 d of regrowth, A. gayanus produced higher quality silage (higher lactate and lower pH and butyrate content) and higher DM yield. However, the low levels of crude protein at this time would make protein supplementation a necessity for proper rumen fermentation. No differences in CH4 kinetic parameters were found with advancing maturity or preservation method (hay or silage).Entities:
Keywords: In vitro; Maturity; Methane; Rumen; Silage Quality; Tropical Grass
Year: 2014 PMID: 25049959 PMCID: PMC4093266 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Figure 1Rainfall, minimum and maximum temperature and relative humidity from December 2006 to April 2007 at the experimental station of Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Average values of pH, aluminum (Al3+), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (Mg2+), hydrogen plus (H+ Al) and texture, according to depth, in soil at the field area in Lagoa Santa, MG, Brazil
| Depth (cm) | pH (in H2O) | Al3+ (cmolc dm3-1) | P (mg dm3-1 ) | K (mg dm3-1) | Ca2+ (cmolc dm3-1) | Mg2+ (cmolc dm3-1) | H+ Al (cmolc dm3-1) | Texture | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||
| Clay | Silt | Sand | ||||||||
| 0–20 | 5.3 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 183 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 6.93 | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.32 |
Agronomic characteristics of Andropogon gayanus grass harvested at different regrowth stages
| Item | Regrowth age (d) | SEM | p-value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
| 56 | 84 | 112 | 140 | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| DM yield (kg DM/ha) | 1,777.1 | 5,758.2 | 10,527.0 | 9,968.4 | 637.77 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Digetible DM yield (kg DDM/ha) | 1,035.4 | 3,387.8 | 5,891.4 | 5,392.0 | 349.26 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Pasture height (m) | 0.82 | 1.22 | 1.44 | 2.48 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Leaf (g/kg DM) | 800 | 540 | 750 | 440 | 24.0 | 0.01 | NS |
| Stem (g/kg DM) | 200 | 460 | 250 | 560 | 24.0 | 0.01 | NS |
| Stem/leaf | 0.26 | 0.85 | 0.34 | 1.30 | 0.059 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Light interception (proportion) | 0.83 | 0.96 | 0.97 | - | 0.018 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Leaf area index | 2.41 | 3.86 | 4.48 | - | 0.209 | 0.01 | NS |
NS = Nn-significant.
Chemical composition and in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) of Andropogon gayanus grass harvested at different regrowth stages and preserved as hay or silage
| Item | Sample type (ST) | Regrowth age (days) | SEM | p-value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||||
| 56 | 84 | 112 | 140 | Linear | Quadratic | ST | ST vs age | |||
| Dry matter (g/kg) | Hay | 216.9 | 255.9 | 259.8 | 358.3 | 8.05 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | NS |
| Silage | 193.5 | 251.3 | 223.6 | 318.0 | ||||||
| Organic matter (g/kg DM) | Hay | 927.9 | 937.1 | 947.1 | 958.3 | 2.40 | 0.01 | NS | 0.01 | NS |
| Silage | 927.4 | 929.9 | 942.8 | 952.4 | ||||||
| Crude protein (g/kg DM) | Hay | 73.5 | 58.8 | 43.1 | 21.6 | 4.67 | 0.01 | NS | NS | NS |
| Silage | 69.5 | 70.2 | 43.8 | 36.0 | ||||||
| NDF (g/kg DM) | Hay | 720.4 | 716.0 | 718.3 | 752.2 | 7.40 | 0.01 | 0.01 | NS | NS |
| Silage | 719.5 | 705.2 | 706.7 | 765.4 | ||||||
| ADF (g/kg DM) | Hay | 387.2 | 389.4 | 384.4 | 415.0 | 7.27 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | NS |
| Silage | 407.8 | 402.2 | 376.7 | 442.9 | ||||||
| Lignin (sa) (g/kg DM) | Hay | 69.10 | 68.8 | 62.6 | 69.4 | 4.70 | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Silage | 61.9 | 60.4 | 61.4 | 76.24 | ||||||
| Hemicellulose (g/kg DM) | Hay | 333.1 | 326.6 | 333.9 | 337.1 | 3.94 | 0.01 | NS | 0.01 | NS |
| Silage | 311.7 | 303.0 | 330.0 | 322.5 | ||||||
| Cellulose (g/kg DM) | Hay | 318.2 | 320.6 | 321.8 | 345.6 | 6.39 | 0.02 | NS | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| Silage | 345.9 | 341.8 | 315.4 | 366.7 | NS | 0.01 | ||||
| WSC (g/kg DM) | Hay | 12.8 | 9.1 | 26.7 | 35.1 | 2.24 | 0.01 | NS | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Silage | 2.2 | 1.4 | 2.5 | 1.4 | NS | NS | ||||
| IVDMD (g/kg DM) | Hay | 588.2 | 589.4 | 560.4 | 541.8 | 11.39 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | NS |
| Silage | 572.8 | 556.5 | 535.2 | 466.6 | ||||||
NS = Non-significant; NDF = Neutral detergent fibre; ADF = Acid detergent fibre; WSC = Water soluble carbohydrates; IVDMD = In vitro dry matter digestibility by Tilley and Terry (1963) method.
Fermentation characteristics of Andropogon gayanus silages ensiled at different regrowth stages
| Silage | Regrowth age (d) | SEM | p-value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
| 56 | 84 | 112 | 140 | Linear | Quadratic | ||
| pH | 4.6 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 5.1 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| Ammonia-N (g/kg N) | 162.1 | 75.0 | 89.9 | 188.1 | 22.41 | NS | 0.01 |
| Acetate (g/kg DM) | 17.5 | 10.6 | 10.7 | 7.3 | 2.43 | 0.01 | NS |
| Propionate (g/kg DM) | 0.68 | 0.27 | 0.08 | 2.02 | 0.347 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Butyrate (g/kg DM) | 10.6 | 9.4 | 2.6 | 17.3 | 2.51 | NS | 0.01 |
| Lactate (g/kg DM) | 31.1 | 38.2 | 88.6 | 20.7 | 14.45 | NS | 0.01 |
NS = Non-significant.
In vitro gas kinetic parameters, apparent dry matter disappearance (aDMD) and NDF disappearance (NDFD) after 72 h of incubation of Andropogon gayanus grass harvested at different regrowth stages and preserved as hay or silage
| Parameters | Sample type (ST) | Regrowth age (d) | SEM | p | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||||
| 56 | 84 | 112 | 140 | Linear | Quadratic | ST | ST vs age | |||
| B (mL/g DM) | Hay | 195.5 | 191.2 | 181.7 | 181.4 | 5.11 | 0.01 | NS | NS | 0.01 |
| Silage | 198.7 | 214.4 | 180.7 | 174.7 | 0.01 | NS | ||||
| Hay | 0.023 | 0.020 | 0.025 | 0.026 | 0.0009 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | |
| Silage | 0.021 | 0.016 | 0.025 | 0.022 | 0.01 | NS | ||||
| Lag (h) | Hay | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 0.07 | NS | NS | 0.04 | NS |
| Silage | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 2.0 | ||||||
| AFR (mL gas/h) | Hay | 3.2 | 2.7 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 0.13 | NS | 0.04 | 0.01 | NS |
| Silage | 2.9 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 2.7 | ||||||
| Gas (72 h, mL/g aDMD) | Hay | 325.1 | 303.2 | 307.0 | 321.9 | 3.67 | NS | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Silage | 282.5 | 288.3 | 301.8 | 305.1 | 0.01 | NS | ||||
| aDMD (72 h, g/kg) | Hay | 502.7 | 485.1 | 506.1 | 496.3 | 10.92 | NS | NS | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Silage | 453.7 | 498.1 | 515.7 | 443.7 | NS | 0.01 | ||||
| NDFD (72 h, g/kg) | Hay | 436.3 | 404.1 | 426.5 | 420.2 | 12.18 | NS | NS | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| Silage | 380.6 | 418.6 | 434.9 | 377.2 | NS | 0.01 | ||||
In vitro fermentation characteristics after 72 h of incubation of Andropogon gayanus grass harvested at different regrowth stages and preserved as hay or silage
| Item | Sample type (ST) | Regrowth age (days) | SEM | p-value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||||
| 56 | 84 | 112 | 140 | Linear | Quadratic | ST | ST vs age | |||
| Total VFA (mM) | Hay | 86.8 | 81.4 | 83.7 | 84.4 | 3.10 | NS | NS | 0.01 | NS |
| Silage | 76.5 | 82.0 | 77.6 | 73.0 | ||||||
| Acetate (A) (mol/100 mol) | Hay | 65.1 | 64.2 | 64.7 | 63.4 | 1.46 | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Silage | 63.8 | 63.1 | 64.8 | 62.0 | ||||||
| Propionate (P) (mol/100 mol) | Hay | 21.1 | 21.0 | 20.8 | 22.1 | 0.49 | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Silage | 21.0 | 21.5 | 21.8 | 21.9 | ||||||
| Butyrate (mol/100 mol) | Hay | 8.6 | 9.1 | 9.0 | 9.3 | 0.58 | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Silage | 9.1 | 9.2 | 8.5 | 9.9 | ||||||
| BCVFA (mol/100 mol) | Hay | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 0.31 | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Silage | 4.4 | 4.5 | 3.6 | 4.4 | ||||||
| Valerate (mol/100 mol) | Hay | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.11 | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Silage | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.4 | ||||||
| Caproate (mol/100 mol) | Hay | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.04 | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Silage | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | ||||||
| A:P ratio | Hay | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 0.14 | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Silage | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.9 | ||||||
| Ammonia-N (mmol) | Hay | 21.0 | 20.2 | 19.7 | 20.7 | 0.77 | NS | 0.04 | NS | NS |
| Silage | 20.7 | 21.0 | 18.5 | 21.6 | ||||||
| pH | Hay | 6.68 | 6.69 | 6.64 | 6.65 | 0.019 | NS | NS | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Silage | 6.78 | 6.71 | 6.70 | 6.62 | 0.01 | NS | ||||
In vitro kinetic parameters and CH4 production (mL/g DMD) after 72 h of incubation of Andropogon gayanus grass harvested at different regrowth stages and preserved as hay or silage
| Parameters | Sample type (ST) | Regrowth age (days) | SEM | p | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||||
| 56 | 84 | 112 | 140 | Linear | Quadratic | ST | ST vs age | |||
| B (CH4 mL/g DM) | Hay | 40.0 | 38.6 | 37.1 | 39.9 | 1.23 | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Silage | 37.7 | 40.3 | 37.2 | 37.2 | ||||||
| Hay | 0.030 | 0.030 | 0.031 | 0.032 | 0.0008 | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Silage | 0.031 | 0.029 | 0.030 | 0.031 | ||||||
| Lag (h) | Hay | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.35 | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Silage | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 0.8 | ||||||
| AFR (mL gas/h) | Hay | 0.86 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.039 | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Silage | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.82 | ||||||
| CH4 mL/g DMD (72 h) | Hay | 84.3 | 82.3 | 80.6 | 83.3 | 2.86 | NS | NS | NS | NS |
| Silage | 86.7 | 83.0 | 80.1 | 87.1 | ||||||
B = Asymptotic CH4 production (mL/g DM); k = Fractional fermentation rate (h−1); Lag = Lag time (h); AFR = Average fermentation rate (mL gas/h) calculated as (B×k)/[(2×ln 2)+(k×L)].