| Literature DB >> 25049839 |
S T Ahmed1, M E Hossain1, G M Kim1, J A Hwang1, H Ji1, C J Yang1.
Abstract
A study was conducted to evaluate the effects of resveratrol and essential oils from medicinal plants on the growth performance, immunity, digestibility, and fecal microbial shedding of weaned piglets. A total of 48 weaned piglets (8 kg initial weight, 28-d-old) were randomly allotted to four dietary treatments with 3 replications of 4 piglets each. The dietary treatments were NC (negative control; basal diet), PC (positive control; basal diet+0.002% apramycin), T1 (basal diet+0.2% resveratrol), and T2 (basal diet+0.0125% essential oil blend). All piglets were orally challenged with 5 ml culture fluid containing 2.3×10(8) cfu/ml of Escherichia coli KCTC 2571 and 5.9×10(8) cfu/ml Salmonella enterica serover Typhimurium. The PC group (p<0.05) showed the highest average daily gain (ADG) and average daily feed intake (ADFI) throughout the experimental period, although feed conversion ratio (FCR) was improved in the T1 group (p>0.05). Serum IgG level was increased in the T1 group, whereas TNF-α levels was reduced in the supplemented groups compared to control (p<0.05). The PC diet improved the dry matter (DM) digestibility, whereas PC and T2 diets improved nitrogen (N) digestibility compared to NC and T1 diets (p<0.05). Fecal Salmonella and E. coli counts were reduced in all treatment groups compared to control (p<0.05). Fecal Lactobacillus spp. count was increased in the T2 group compared to others (p<0.05). Dietary treatments had no significant effect on fecal Bacillus spp. count throughout the entire experimental period. Based on these results, resveratrol showed strong potential as antibiotic alternatives for reversing the adverse effects of weaning stress on growth performance, immunity and microbial environment in E. coli and Salmonella-challenged piglets.Entities:
Keywords: Challenged Piglets; Essential Oil Blend; Growth; Immunity; Microorganism; Resveratrol
Year: 2013 PMID: 25049839 PMCID: PMC4093338 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12683
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Ingredients and chemical compositions of the basal diets (starter)
| Item | |
|---|---|
| Ingredients (%, as-fed basis) | |
| Yellow corn | 45.15 |
| Wheat | 23.00 |
| Wheat bran | 4.00 |
| Soybean meal | 18.00 |
| Limestone | 0.98 |
| Calcium phosphate | 1.10 |
| Salt | 0.25 |
| Vitamin and mineral premix | 0.55 |
| Animal fat | 2.50 |
| Molasses | 4.30 |
| L-lysine | 0.17 |
| Chemical composition (as-fed basis) | |
| ME (kcal/kg) | 3,265.00 |
| Crude protein (%) | 18.00 |
| Ca (%) | 0.70 |
| Available phosphorus (%) | 0.55 |
| Lysine (%) | 0.95 |
| Methionine (%) | 0.30 |
Vitamin and mineral premix provided the following nutrients per kg of complete diet: vitamin A, 6,000 IU; vitamin D3, 800 IU; vitamin E, 20 IU; vitamin K3, 2 mg; thiamin, 2 mg; riboflavin, 4 mg; vitamin B6, 2 mg; vitamin B12, 1 mg; pantothenicacid, 11 mg; niacin, 10 mg; biotin, 0.02 mg; Cu (copper sulfate), 21 mg; Fe (ferrous sulfate), 100 mg; Zn (zinc sulfate), 60 mg; Mn (manganese sulfate), 90 mg; I (calcium iodate), 1.0 mg; Co (cobalt nitrate), 0.3 mg; Se (sodium selenite), 0.3 mg.
Calculated values.
Figure 1.Basic structural formula of resveratrol and the main bioactive components of essential oils blend
Effects of resveratrol and essential oils blend on growth performance and nutrient digestibility of challenged piglets
| Items | Treatments | SE | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | PC | T1 | T2 | |||
| Initial body weight (kg) | 8.03 | 8.09 | 7.96 | 8.02 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
| Average daily gain (g/d) | ||||||
| 0 to 2 wk | 291 | 400 | 295 | 246 | 62.8 | 0.03 |
| 2 to 4 wk | 176 | 317 | 294 | 206 | 41.6 | <0.01 |
| 0 to 4 wk | 234 | 358 | 294 | 226 | 35.1 | <0.01 |
| Average daily feed intake (g/d) | ||||||
| 0 to 2 wk | 440 | 521 | 410 | 499 | 17.8 | <0.0001 |
| 2 to 4 wk | 516 | 866 | 714 | 470 | 9.02 | <0.0001 |
| 0 to 4 wk | 478 | 694 | 562 | 484 | 10.8 | <0.0001 |
| Feed conversion ratio (feed/gain) | ||||||
| 0 to 2 wk | 1.52 | 1.35 | 1.45 | 2.10 | 0.32 | 0.03 |
| 2 to 4 wk | 2.94 | 2.81 | 2.44 | 2.42 | 0.48 | 0.34 |
| 0 to 4 wk | 2.05 | 1.97 | 1.92 | 2.17 | 0.22 | 0.41 |
| Digestibility of nutrients (%) | ||||||
| Dry matter | 74.7 | 88.0 | 77.4 | 78.7 | 1.55 | <0.0001 |
| Nitrogen | 67.6 | 78.4 | 70.6 | 77.6 | 2.83 | <0.01 |
Means in a row with no common superscripts significantly differ (p<0.05).
Values represent the means of three pens with four pigs per pen.
NC (Negative control), basal diet; PC (Positive control), basal diet+0.002% Apramycin; T1, basal diet+0.2% Respig (containing resveratrol); T2, basal diet+0.0125% Biomin PEP; (essential oils blend).
Pooled standard error.
Effects of resveratrol and essential oils blend on serum levels of immunoglobulins (mg/mL) and TNF-α (pg/mL) of challenged piglets
| Items | Treatments | SE | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | PC | T1 | T2 | |||
| IgG (mg/ml) | 304 | 366 | 466 | 409 | 27.7 | <0.01 |
| IgM (mg/ml) | 30.2 | 29.9 | 30.0 | 30.3 | 0.64 | 0.90 |
| IgA (mg/ml) | 6.33 | 5.80 | 6.85 | 6.87 | 0.83 | 0.04 |
| TNF-α (pg/ml) | 136 | 99.0 | 115 | 108 | 17.7 | 0.09 |
Means in a row with no common superscripts significantly differ (p<0.05) or tend to differ (p<0.10).
Values represent the means of three pens with four pigs per pen.
NC (Negative control), basal diet; PC (Positive control), basal diet+0.002% Apramycin; T1, basal diet+0.2% Respig (containing resveratrol); T2, basal diet+0.0125% Biomin PEP; (essential oils blend).
Pooled standard error.
Effects of dietary treatments on fecal microbial concentrations in challenged piglets (cfu/ml)
| Week | Treatments | SE | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | PC | T1 | T2 | |||
| 1 | 4.09 | 3.54 | 3.68 | 4.04 | 0.37 | 0.26 |
| 2 | 4.09 | 1.88 | 3.82 | 4.37 | 0.52 | <0.01 |
| 3 | 4.26 | 1.33 | 3.66 | 3.99 | 0.42 | <0.01 |
| 4 | 4.34 | 0.80 | 3.34 | 3.39 | 0.44 | <0.0001 |
| 1 | 4.88 | 5.09 | 5.46 | 5.45 | 0.33 | 0.16 |
| 2 | 5.64 | 5.19 | 5.58 | 5.75 | 0.35 | 0.29 |
| 3 | 6.08 | 5.06 | 5.34 | 5.25 | 0.27 | 0.01 |
| 4 | 6.23 | 5.07 | 5.26 | 5.13 | 0.18 | <0.01 |
| 1 | 7.04 | 6.23 | 7.21 | 6.62 | 0.39 | 0.05 |
| 2 | 7.24 | 6.73 | 7.33 | 7.29 | 0.32 | 0.15 |
| 3 | 7.12 | 6.55 | 7.08 | 7.50 | 0.36 | 0.07 |
| 4 | 6.95 | 7.18 | 6.79 | 7.71 | 0.27 | 0.01 |
| 1 | 5.91 | 6.01 | 6.17 | 6.21 | 0.25 | 0.46 |
| 2 | 6.33 | 6.53 | 6.37 | 6.64 | 0.39 | 0.76 |
| 3 | 6.38 | 6.43 | 6.29 | 6.56 | 0.44 | 0.90 |
| 4 | 6.22 | 6.23 | 6.10 | 6.75 | 0.54 | 0.51 |
Means in a row with no common superscripts significantly differ (p<0.05) or tend to differ (p<0.10).
Values represent the means of three pens with four pigs per pen.
NC (Negative control), basal diet; PC (Positive control), basal diet+0.002% Apramycin; T1, basal diet+0.2% Respig (containing resveratrol); T2, basal diet+0.0125% Biomin PEP; (essential oils blend).
Pooled standard error.