| Literature DB >> 25049829 |
Dajeong Lim1, Cedric Gondro2, Hye Sun Park1, Yong Min Cho1, Han Ha Chai1, Hwan Hoo Seong1, Bo Suk Yang3, Seong Koo Hong1, Won Kyung Chang1, Seung Hwan Lee3.
Abstract
Hanwoo have been subjected over the last seventy years to intensive artificial selection with the aim of improving meat production traits such as marbling and carcass weight. In this study, we performed a signature of selection analysis to identify recent positive selected regions driven by a long-term artificial selection process called a breeding program using whole genome SNP data. In order to investigate homozygous regions across the genome, we estimated iES (integrated Extended Haplotype Homozygosity SNP) for the each SNPs. As a result, we identified two highly homozygous regions that seem to be strong and/or recent positive selection. Five genes (DPH5, OLFM3, S1PR1, LRRN1 and CRBN) were included in this region. To go further in the interpretation of the observed signatures of selection, we subsequently concentrated on the annotation of differentiated genes defined according to the iES value of SNPs localized close or within them. We also described the detection of the adaptive evolution at the molecular level for the genes of interest. As a result, this analysis also led to the identification of OLFM3 as having a strong signal of selection in bovine lineage. The results of this study indicate that artificial selection which might have targeted most of these genes was mainly oriented towards improvement of meat production.Entities:
Keywords: Hanwoo; SNP; Signatures of Selection
Year: 2013 PMID: 25049829 PMCID: PMC4093327 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12456
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Figure 1.Genome wide extended haplotype homozygosity (EHH) profiling to detect signature of selection in Hanwoo.
Summary statistics of the integrated EHHS (iES) values for selection signature in candidate genes
| Chromosome | Candidate region | Closet SNP name and position (bp) | iES value |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTA3 | DPH5 (DPH5 homolog ( | rs29020061 (40,929,695) | 7.21 |
| S1PR1(sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1) | rs29018907 (41,249,954) | 7.46 | |
| OLFM3(olfactomedin 3) | rs29018230 (41,792,758) | 9.82 | |
| BTA12 | LRRN1(Leucine-rich repeat neuronal protein 1) | rs29015171 (20,796,087) | 12.55 |
| CRBN (Protein cereblon) | rs29017072 (21,841,651) | 11.71 |
Gene Ontology and KEGG pathway of the candidate genes showing evidence for selection signatures
| Candidate gene | GO term | KEGG pathway |
|---|---|---|
| DPH5 | Peptidyl-diphthamide biosynthetic process from peptidyl-histidine(GO:0017183) | - |
| S1PR1 | Angiogenesis (GO:0001525), cell adhesion (GO:0007155), G-protein coupled receptor protein signaling pathway (GO:0007186), inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity by G-protein signaling pathway (GO:0007193), brain development (GO:0007420) | Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction |
| OLFM3 | Eye photoreceptor cell development (GO:0042462) | - |
| LRRN1 | Integral to membrane (GO:0016021) | - |
| CRBN | Negative regulation of protein homooligomerization (GO:0032463), negative regulation of ion transmembrane transport (GO:0034766) | - |
Likelihood estimates of different evolutionary models (Model0 vs Model2)
| Gene Name | dN/dS | Degree of freedom | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1PR1 | 0.05 | 1 | 1.93 | NS |
| DPH5 | 0.09 | 1 | 0.18 | NS |
| OLFM3 | 0.12 | 1 | 31.47 | <0.001* |
| LRRN1 | 0.03 | 1 | 5.34 | NS |
| CRBN | 0.05 | 1 | 1.21 | NS |
Degree of freedom is the difference in the number of parameters between evolutionary models.
x2 is twice the difference of log likelihood between models.
p-value is the probability that two models should differ in log likelihood given the degree of freedom.
Figure 2.Phylogeny of OLFM3. Branch lengths were estimated by maximum likelihood under the free-ratio model that assumes an independent ω-value for each branch. ω-values are shown for each branch.