| Literature DB >> 25049798 |
J K Seo1, M H Kim1, J Y Yang1, H J Kim1, C H Lee1, K H Kim1, Jong K Ha1.
Abstract
A series of in vitro studies were carried out to determine i) the effects of enzyme and formaldehyde treatment on the degradation characteristics of carbohydrate and protein sources and on the synchronicity of these processes, and ii) the effects of synchronizing carbohydrate and protein supply on rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis (MPS) in in vitro experiments. Untreated corn (C) and enzyme-treated corn (EC) were combined with soy bean meal with (ES) and without (S) enzyme treatment or formaldehyde treatment (FS). Six experimental feeds (CS, CES, CFS, ECS, ECES and ECFS) with different synchrony indices were prepared. Highly synchronous diets had the greatest dry matter (DM) digestibility when untreated corn was used. However, the degree of synchronicity did not influence DM digestibility when EC was mixed with various soybean meals. At time points of 12 h and 24 h of incubation, EC-containing diets showed lower ammonia-N concentrations than those of C-containing diets, irrespective of the degree of synchronicity, indicating that more efficient utilization of ammonia-N for MPS was achieved by ruminal microorganisms when EC was offered as a carbohydrate source. Within C-containing treatments, the purine base concentration increased as the diets were more synchronized. This effect was not observed when EC was offered. There were significant effects on VFA concentration of both C and S treatments and their interactions. Similar to purine concentrations, total VFA production and individual VFA concentration in the groups containing EC as an energy source was higher than those of other groups (CS, CES and CFS). The results of the present study suggested that the availability of energy or the protein source are the most limiting factors for rumen fermentation and MPS, rather than the degree of synchronicity.Entities:
Keywords: Enzyme; Formaldehyde; Microbial Protein Synthesis; Rumen Fermentation; Synchronicity
Year: 2013 PMID: 25049798 PMCID: PMC4093482 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Chemical composition of feed ingredients
| C | EC | S | ES | FS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DM | (%) | 88.56 | 87.93 | 90.59 | 85.45 | 82.75 |
| OM | (% DM) | 99.16 | 99.24 | 93.85 | 93.62 | 93.97 |
| CP | (% DM) | 8.47 | 9.15 | 54.04 | 54.92 | 54.47 |
| EE | (% DM) | 3.97 | 4.15 | 1.49 | 1.47 | 1.78 |
| NDF | (% DM) | 12.99 | 13.11 | 14.29 | 14.55 | 14.83 |
| ADF | (% DM) | 4.65 | 4.77 | 10.17 | 10.11 | 10.54 |
C = Corn, EC = Enzyme treated corn, S = Soybean meal, ES = Enzyme treated soybean meal, FS = Formaldehyde treated soybean meal.
Dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) and organic matter degradation kinetics of the feeds used in the in situ study
| Items | Feeds | a | b | c | a+b | ED (k = 0.05) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DM | ||||||
| C | 11.47 | 78.57 | 0.04 | 90.05 | 45.54 | |
| EC | 15.74 | 67.63 | 0.06 | 83.36 | 51.04 | |
| S | 25.47 | 53.41 | 0.07 | 78.88 | 56.47 | |
| ES | 31.86 | 60.65 | 0.08 | 92.51 | 68.90 | |
| FS | 17.74 | 82.26 | 0.02 | 100.00 | 37.53 | |
| SEM | 1.9518 | 3.8519 | 0.0075 | 3.2533 | 2.8909 | |
| CP | ||||||
| C | 8.72 | 69.12 | 0.06 | 77.84 | 40.22 | |
| EC | 17.31 | 59.29 | 0.06 | 76.60 | 45.95 | |
| S | 11.56 | 55.38 | 0.08 | 66.94 | 44.29 | |
| ES | 18.75 | 64.22 | 0.12 | 82.97 | 63.36 | |
| FS | 0.59 | 99.41 | 0.01 | 100.00 | 14.46 | |
| SEM | 1.8033 | 5.2152 | 0.011 | 4.4575 | 4.2494 | |
| OM | ||||||
| C | 11.19 | 78.74 | 0.04 | 89.93 | 45.16 | |
| EC | 16.17 | 68.15 | 0.05 | 84.32 | 51.00 | |
| S | 23.68 | 55.82 | 0.07 | 79.49 | 54.84 | |
| ES | 30.19 | 63.74 | 0.08 | 93.93 | 67.81 | |
| FS | 15.57 | 84.43 | 0.02 | 100.00 | 35.19 | |
| SEM | 1.8071 | 3.7936 | 0.0068 | 3.2646 | 2.9499 |
a = Readily soluble fraction, b = Insoluble but potentially degradable fraction, c = Constant rate of degradation of b (%/h).
ED = Effective degradability. Rumen passage rate (k) was considered to 0.05.
SEM means standard error for means.
Indicates that the means are significantly different within different feeds (p<0.05).
Chemical composition and synchrony index of formulated experimental feeds
| CS | CES | CFS | ECS | ECES | ECFS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DM | (%) | 88.95 | 87.96 | 87.45 | 88.44 | 87.46 | 86.94 |
| OM | (%DM) | 98.14 | 98.10 | 98.17 | 98.21 | 98.16 | 98.23 |
| CP | (%DM) | 17.19 | 17.36 | 17.27 | 17.74 | 17.91 | 17.82 |
| EE | (%DM) | 3.50 | 3.49 | 3.55 | 3.64 | 3.64 | 3.70 |
| NDF | (%DM) | 13.24 | 13.29 | 13.34 | 13.34 | 13.39 | 13.44 |
| ADF | (%DM) | 5.71 | 5.69 | 5.78 | 5.80 | 5.79 | 5.87 |
| SI | 0.85 | 0.95 | 0.71 | 0.93 | 0.80 | 0.72 |
SI = synchrony index. SI close to 1.0 means that ruminal release of protein and energy sources is balanced appropriately compared to those having lower SI.
In vitro DM digestibility, pH variation and NH3-N concentration as influenced by different feed treatments
| Item | Treatment | SEM | significance | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||
| C | EC |
| ||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||
| S | ES | FS | S | ES | FS | CT | ST | CT×ST | ||
| SI | 0.85 | 0.95 | 0.71 | 0.93 | 0.8 | 0.72 | ||||
|
| ||||||||||
| DM digestibility (%) | ||||||||||
| 0 h | 13.32 | 13.78 | 11.53 | 10.32 | 10.57 | 8.67 | 0.2048 | NS | ||
| 3 h | 16.44 | 16.73 | 13.53 | 16.47 | 16.77 | 13.67 | 0.0793 | NS | NS | |
| 6 h | 20.93 | 21.94 | 17.26 | 22.49 | 24.01 | 18.39 | 0.1354 | NS | ||
| 12 h | 31.00 | 32.27 | 21.84 | 32.37 | 33.73 | 24.31 | 0.2783 | NS | ||
| 24 h | 47.78 | 49.01 | 36.85 | 47.43 | 48.48 | 40.35 | 0.2892 | |||
| pH | ||||||||||
| 0 h | 7.17 | 7.15 | 7.11 | 7.15 | 7.14 | 7.14 | 0.0122 | NS | NS | |
| 3 h | 7.08 | 7.04 | 7.03 | 6.91 | 6.82 | 6.89 | 0.0182 | NS | NS | |
| 6 h | 6.72 | 6.63 | 6.72 | 6.38 | 6.26 | 6.38 | 0.0215 | NS | ||
| 12 h | 6.21 | 6.14 | 6.59 | 5.82 | 5.70 | 6.17 | 0.021 | NS | ||
| 24 h | 5.39 | 5.35 | 5.74 | 5.37 | 5.37 | 5.47 | 0.0146 | |||
| NH3-N concentration (mg/100ml) | ||||||||||
| 0 h | 3.69 | 3.83 | 4.49 | 3.76 | 4.13 | 4.10 | 0.1184 | NS | NS | |
| 3 h | 5.17 | 6.36 | 1.86 | 5.41 | 5.79 | 2.09 | 0.0952 | NS | ||
| 6 h | 6.13 | 8.23 | 0.51 | 7.43 | 8.23 | 1.81 | 0.3132 | NS | ||
| 12 h | 11.27 | 11.96 | 2.66 | 6.20 | 5.14 | 1.84 | 0.4907 | |||
| 24 h | 27.09 | 27.81 | 4.38 | 22.53 | 20.39 | 5.36 | 0.7257 | |||
C = Corn, EC = Enzyme treated corn, S = Soybean meal, ES = Enzyme treated soybean meal, FS = Formaldehyde treated soybean meal.
SEM = Standard error of the mean.
SI = Synchrony index. SI close to 1.0 means that ruminal release of protein and energy sources is balanced appropriately compared to those having lower SI.
Significant at p<0.05.
Significant at p<0.01. NS = Not significant (p>0.05).
CT = The effect of C treatment, ST = The effect of S treatment and CT×ST = The interaction between C and S treatment.
Indicates significant difference within the same raw (p<0.05).
VFA and purine concentration as influenced by different feed treatments at 12 h incubation
| Item | Treatment | SEM | significance | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | EC | |||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||
| S | ES | FS | S | ES | FS | CT | ST | CT×ST | ||
| SI | 0.85 | 0.95 | 0.71 | 0.93 | 0.8 | 0.72 | ||||
|
| ||||||||||
| VFA concentration (mM) | ||||||||||
| Total | 81.77 | 87.22 | 63.78 | 97.21 | 103.20 | 85.44 | 1.506 | |||
| Acetate | 41.06 | 42.99 | 33.59 | 44.61 | 45.79 | 39.10 | 0.5146 | |||
| Propionate | 25.48 | 28.04 | 18.69 | 35.40 | 38.52 | 30.65 | 0.7316 | |||
| Iso-butyrate | 0.93 | 1.06 | 0.69 | 1.34 | 1.52 | 0.92 | 0.0761 | |||
| Butyrate | 12.05 | 12.77 | 9.14 | 13.46 | 14.59 | 12.55 | 0.3423 | |||
| Iso-Valerate | 1.24 | 1.30 | 0.88 | 1.23 | 1.41 | 1.04 | 0.0295 | |||
| Valerate | 1.01 | 1.06 | 0.79 | 1.16 | 1.33 | 1.18 | 0.052 | |||
| A:P ratio | 1.61 | 1.53 | 1.8 | 1.26 | 1.19 | 1.28 | 0.0304 | |||
| Purine base (μg/ml) | ||||||||||
| 0 h | 9.13 | 9.17 | 8.94 | 8.92 | 8.88 | 8.82 | 0.1366 | NS | NS | NS |
| 12 h | 30.09 | 33.98 | 19.52 | 38.89 | 40.15 | 27.67 | 0.2923 | |||
| 24 h | 33.92 | 33.42 | 29.11 | 27.86 | 27.09 | 26.70 | 0.7118 | |||
C = Corn, EC = Enzyme treated corn, S = Soybean meal, ES = Enzyme treated soybean meal, FS = Formaldehyde treated soybean meal.
SEM means standard error of the mean.
SI = Synchrony index. SI close to 1.0 means that ruminal release of protein and energy sources is balanced appropriately compared to those having lower SI.
Significant at p<0.05.
Significant at p<0.01.
NS = Not significant (p>0.05).
CT = The effect of C treatment, ST = The effect of S treatment and CT×ST = The interaction between C and S treatment.
Indicates significant difference within the same raw (p<0.05).