| Literature DB >> 25049649 |
J I Ahn1, S T Lee1, J H Park1, J Y Kim2, J H Park1, J K Choi1, G Lee3, E S Lee2, J M Lim1.
Abstract
This study was conducted to determine how the isolation method of the porcine preantral follicles influenced the following follicular growth in vitro. Mechanical and enzymatical isolations were used for retrieving the follicles from prepubertal porcine ovaries, and in vitro-growth of the follicles and the expression of folliculogenesis-related genes were subsequently monitored. The enzymatic retrieval with collagenase treatment returned more follicles than the mechanical retrieval, while the percentage of morphologically normal follicles was higher with mechanical retrieval than with enzymatic retrieval. After 4 days of culture, mechanically retrieved, preantral follicles yielded more follicles with normal morphology than enzymatically retrieved follicles, which resulted in improved follicular growth. The mRNA expression of FSHR, LHR Cx43, DNMT1 and FGFR2 genes was significantly higher after culture of the follicles retrieved mechanically. These results suggest that mechanical isolation is a better method of isolating porcine preantral follicles that will develop into competent oocytes in in vitro culture.Entities:
Keywords: Enzymatic Retrieval; Follicular Growth; In vitro Culture; Mechanical Retrieval; Porcine; Preantral Follicle
Year: 2012 PMID: 25049649 PMCID: PMC4092981 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2010.10355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Real time RT-PCR primer used
| Gene | Primer sequence
| |
|---|---|---|
| Sense (5’>3’) | Antisense (5’>3’) | |
| GATGTGATTTGCTCCCCTGAG | AAGGAACCGAGGGACTGTGA | |
| GATAGAAGCTAATGCCTTTG | GGTATTTTAACCGAGGTAGA | |
| CGCTTATTTCAATGGCTGCTC | AAAGGCTGTGCATGGGAGTTA | |
| AGGTGAGGACATGCAGCTTT | AACTTGTTGTCCGTTGG | |
| ATTCTGTGCCGGATGAAAGAC | GGTGTTGGAGTTCATGGAGG | |
| CGGCTACCACATCCAAGGAA | CTCCAATGGATCCTCGTTAAAGG | |
The number of morphologically normal follicles per ovary between mechanical method and enzymatic combined isolation method
| Methods of isolation | Profiles of ovaries examined
| Total no. of follicles retrieved | % of normal follicles | No. of normal follicles retrieved per ovary | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size (cm) | Weight (g) | ||||
| Mechanical | 2.5±0.3 | 2.9±0.7 | 68±30 | 95±4 | 65±30 |
| Enzymatic | 2.5±0.3 | 2.9±0.7 | 128±58 | 74±7 | 96±44 |
Model effects of the treatment on total number of follicles retrieved, the percentage of normal follicles retrieved and number of normal follicles retrieved per ovary, which were indicated as p value, were 0.0207, less than 0.0001 and 0.1228, respectively.
The follicles existing intact basement membrane and integrated follicular structure were regarded as morphologically normal follicles.
The diameters of preantral follicles cultured on day 4, percentage of follicles maintaining morphological integrity, number of follicles derived from diffuse oocytes, and number of intrafollicular oocytes undergoing germinal vesicle (GV) breakdown differed significantly between enzymatic and mechanical isolation
| Parameters | Day of culture | Follicle isolation
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| With collagenase | Without collagenase | ||
| Number of preantral follicles cultured | - | 100 | 100 |
| Diameter of follicles (μm) | 0 | 232.72±8.5 | 231.75±9.5 |
| Diameter of follicles (μm) | 1 | 237.62±6.4 | 236.55±3.7 |
| Diameter of follicles (μm) | 2 | 240.04±7.3 | 239.18±5.2 |
| Diameter of follicles (μm) | 3 | 242.36±8.3 | 245.58±2.9 |
| Diameter of follicles (μm) | 4 | 243.05±9.2 | 255.57±1.3 |
| %, follicles formed pseudoantrum | 2 | 99±2.4 | 100±0.0 |
| %, follicles remained morphological integrity | 4 | 73±5.7 | 95.2±4.2 |
| %, follicles derived diffused oocytes | 4 | 66.9±6.7 | 84.0±6.4 |
| %, oocytes underwent GV breakdown | 4 | 1.5±3.7 | 13.0±4.9 |
| %, oocytes matured | 4 | 0 | 1.1±2.7 |
*p<0.05,
**p<0.001.
Figure 3Breakdown of the basement membrane of porcine preantral follicles during in vitro culture. Preantral follicles were enzymatically isolated from the ovaries and subsequently cultured in vitro. Morphology of the follicles were examined every day during the culture. (A) day 1, (B) day 2, (C) day 3 and (D) day 4. After day 2 of the culture, basement membrane was detached from the surface of follicle (B) and then the follicle was ruptured (C). Bar = 100μm.
Figure 1Gene expression of porcine preantral follicles isolated using a mechanical method alone or mechanical retrieval combined with collagenase treatment. Expression of the (a) FSH receptor (FSHR), (b) LH receptor (LHR), (c) gap junction protein (Cx43), and folliculogenesis-related (d) DNMT1 and (e) FGFR2 genes in the follicles retrieved with mechanical (M) or enzymatic (E) treatment. Data are given as the mean±SE of three replicates. * p<0.05.
Figure 2Gene expression of porcine preantral follicles cultured in vitro for 4 days. Follicles isolated using a mechanical method alone or mechanical retrieval combined with collagenase treatment. Expression of the (a) FSH receptor (FSHR), (b) LH receptor (LHR), (c) gap junction protein (Cx43), and folliculogenesis-related (d) DNMT1 and (e) FGFR2 genes in the follicles retrieved with mechanical (M) or enzymatic (E) treatment. Data are given as the mean±SE of three replicates. * p<0.05, ** p<0.001.