| Literature DB >> 25049605 |
Boyang Liu1, Runjun Yang1, Junya Li2, Lupei Zhang2, Jing Liu1, Chunyan Lu1, Chuanjiang Lian1, Zezhong Li1, Yonghong Zhang1, Liying Zhang1, Zhihui Zhao1.
Abstract
The FAT-1 protein is an n-3 fatty acid desaturase, which can recognize a range of 18- and 20-carbon n-6 substrates and transform n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) into n-3 PUFAs while n-3 PUFAs have beneficial effect on human health. Fat1 gene is the coding sequence from Caenorhabditis elegans which might play an important role on lipometabolism. To reveal the function of fat1 gene in bovine fetal fibroblast cells and gain the best cell nuclear donor for transgenic bovines, the codon of fat1 sequence was optimized based on the codon usage frequency preference of bovine muscle protein, and directionally cloned into the eukaryotic expression vector pEF-GFP. After identifying by restrictive enzyme digests with AatII/XbaI and sequencing, the fusion plasmid pEF-GFP-fat1 was identified successfully. The pEF-GFP-fat1 vector was transfected into bovine fetal fibroblast cells mediated by Lipofectamine2000(TM). The positive bovine fetal fibroblast cells were selected by G418 and detected by RT-PCR. The results showed that a 1,234 bp transcription was amplified by reverse transcription PCR and the positive transgenic fat1 cell line was successfully established. Then the expression level of fat1 gene in positive cells was detected using quantitative PCR, and the catalysis efficiency was detected by gas chromatography. The results demonstrated that the catalysis efficiency of fat1 was significantly high, which can improve the total PUFAs rich in EPA, DHA and DPA. Construction and expression of pEF-GFP-fat1 vector should be helpful for further understanding the mechanism of regulation of fat1 in vitro. It could also be the first step in the production of fat1 transgenic cattle.Entities:
Keywords: Bovine Fetal Fibroblast Cells; Catalysis Efficiency; Gene Expression; fat1
Year: 2012 PMID: 25049605 PMCID: PMC4093122 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2011.11495
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Figure 1Structure of pEF-GFP-fat1 vector. In this vector, fat1 gene is driven by the EF1α promoter, followed by IRES and eGFP, containing the neo gene.
Frank Wright Nc value of bovine muscle protein and fat1 calculated by CHIPS programs
| Gene | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nc value | 44.371 | 48.642 | 46.492 | 30.896 | 47.782 | 41.567 | 41.877 | 33.536 | 41.555 | 42.658 | 42.400 | 41.598 | 34.588 |
Means the CDS sequence after optimization.
Figure 2Identification of pEF-GFP-fat1 using enzyme digests. 1 : pEF-GFP-fat1 plasmid. 2 : DNA marker DL 15000. 3 : digestion by restrictive enzyme XhoI. 4 : digestion by restrictive enzyme AatII/XbaI. 5 : DNA marker DL 2000. The picture shows that fat1 gene was double digested by restrictive enzyme AatII and XbaI.
Figure 3Results of sequencing of recombinant expression vector pEF-GFP-fat1. The pEF-GFP-fat1 plasmids were extracted from positive clones and sequenced by Sangon Company. A : fat1 ORF sequence of pEF-GFP-fat1, digestion sites with AatII and XbaI; B : IRES and eGFP sequence of pEF-GFP-fat1 vector.
Cytotoxicity test of G418 to cultured cells for 12 d
| G418 concentration (μg/ml) | 300 | 400 | 500 | 600 | 700 | 800 |
| Survival rate (%) | + | + | − | − | − | − |
+: survival rate of ≥30%. −: Survival rate of 0%.
Figure 4Compare normal cells with positive cells in morphological, under microscope (40×). A : normal cells before transfection. B : positive cell aggregate, 12 d after G418 selected. The pictures show that positive cell aggregates continue growing while others died after selected.
Figure 5Result of RT-PCR and qPCR. A : amplification curve of qPCR, the result showed fat1 gene can be identified in positive cells. B : dissociation curve of qPCR, the result showed the quality of the reaction was precise. C : result of identification of positive cells by RT-PCR. 1 : marker. 2 : water control group. 3 : pEF-GFP vector control group. 4 : positive cells group. pEF-GFP-fat1 transfection group showed a 1,234 bp fragment. The GAPDH control confirmed the cDNA quality (189 bp), both the pEF-GFP vector group as the negative control and the water group as the blank control were negative result.
Cell cycle change after transfection
| Cell cycle/data | Mean G1 | CV G1 | G1 (%) | Mean G2 | CV G2 | G2 (%) | S (%) | G2/G1 | Chi Sq | Cell No |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | 69.0 | 5.90 | 71.1 | 135 | 5.90 | 15.4 | 13.4 | 1.959 | 4.89 | 13,657 |
| Control | 68.2 | 5.14 | 80.0 | 134 | 5.14 | 12.1 | 7.94 | 1.968 | 9.53 | 16,109 |
Figure 6Cell cycle analysis using Flow CytoMeter. The cell cycle after transfection was looked the same as before. A : positive cells. B : control cells.
PUFAs composition of total lipids from the transgenic cell and the controls
| Fatty acids | Transgenic cells | pEF-GFP vector control | Untransfection control | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n-6 PUFAs | 18:2 n-6 | 1.72 | 2.62 | 2.33 |
| 20:4 n-6 | 2.19 | 5.23 | 3.81 | |
| 22:4 n-6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total n-6 | 3.91 | 7.84 | 6.14 | |
| n-3 PUFAs | 18:3 n-3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20:5 n-3 | 0.85 | 1.87 | 0.92 | |
| 22:5 n-3 | 1.34 | 2.04 | 1.42 | |
| 22:6 n-3 | 1.44 | 1.75 | 1.40 | |
| Total n-3 | 3.62 | 5.67 | 3.74 | |
| n-6/n-3 | 1.08a | 1.38b | 1.64b |
At the same line, different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05).
Figure 7Results of gas chromatograph showing fatty acids profiles of total lipids extracted from cells. A : positive cells. B : pEF-GFP ransgenic. C : non-transgenic control. D : concentration of n-6/n-3 PUFAs in positive cells, pEF-GFP control and non-transgenic control (%).