| Literature DB >> 25049573 |
Anirban Guha, Sandeep Gera, Anshu Sharma.
Abstract
Mastitis is a highly morbid disease that requires detection at the subclinical stage. Tropical countries like India mainly depend on milch buffaloes for milk. The present study was conducted to investigate whether the trace minerals viz. copper (Cu), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), cobalt (Co) and manganese (Mn) and enzyme activity of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in riverine buffalo milk can be used as an indicator of subclinical mastitis (SCM) with the aim of developing suitable diagnostic kit for SCM. Trace elements and enzyme activity in milk were estimated with Atomic absorption Spectrophotometer, GBC 932 plus and biochemical methods, respectively. Somatic cell count (SCC) was done microscopically. The cultural examination revealed Gram positive bacteria as the most prevalent etiological agent. A statistically significant (p<0.01) increase in SCC, Fe, Zn, Co and LDH occurred in SCM milk containing gram positive bacterial agents only. ALP was found to be elevated in milk infected by both gram positive and negative bacteria. The percent sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, predictive values and likelihood ratios were calculated taking bacterial culture examination and SCC≥2×10(5) cells/ml of milk as the benchmark. Only ALP and Zn, the former being superior, were found to be suitable for diagnosis of SCM irrespective of etiological agents. LDH, Co and Fe can be introduced in the screening programs where Gram positive bacteria are omnipresent. It is recommended that both ALP and Zn be measured together in milk to diagnose buffalo SCM, irrespective of etiology.Entities:
Keywords: Enzyme Activity; Indicator; Riverine Buffalo; Somatic Cell Count; Subclinical Mastitis; Trace Minerals
Year: 2012 PMID: 25049573 PMCID: PMC4092961 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2011.11426
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Effect of different bacterial agents on trace mineral and enzyme activity profile of normal and subclinical mastitis milk of riverine buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)
| Parameters | Mean±SE of normal milk (n = 496) | Mean±SE of subclinical mastitis milk (n = 496) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Others+mixed infection (n = 20) | |||||
| Somatic cell count (×105 cells/ml) | 0.98*±0.037 | 2.76**±0.011 | 2.59**±0.024 | 2.14**±0.018 | 2.27**±0.062 |
| Cu (ppm) | 0.381±0.032 | 0.402±0.018 | 0.398±0.021 | 0.376±0.032 | 0.412±0.035 |
| Fe (ppm) | 3.05*±0.23 | 5.41**±0.11 | 5.76**±0.18 | 3.33*±0.31 | 5.48**±0.43 |
| Zn (ppm) | 3.57*±0.27 | 6.16**±0.19 | 6.73**±0.21 | 3.99*±0.45 | 6.06**±0.42 |
| Mn (ppm) | 0.56±0.11 | 0.57±0.04 | 0.59±0.08 | 0.54±.14 | 0.57±0.14 |
| Co (ppm) | 0.029*±0.019 | 0.107**±0.023 | 0.112**±0.027 | 0.032*±0.012 | 0.114**±0.033 |
| LDH (U/L) | 96.64*±31.64 | 291.32**±24.91 | 301.92**±26.45 | 102.22*±33.21 | 296.23**±34.91 |
| ALP (U/L) | 284.50*±31.57 | 822.71**±23.21 | 798.87**±28.22 | 787.87**±32.29 | 812.98**±34.09 |
| AST (U/L) | 23.32±1.35 | 21.13±1.08 | 24.65±1.12 | 23.98±1.93 | 22.67±1.11 |
Mean having different superscripts * and ** horizontally differ significantly (p<0.01).
Mean±SE of SCC, trace minerals and enzyme activity in milk from normal and subclinical mastitis (irrespective of the causative agent) in riverine buffalo (n = 496)
| Parameter | Normal milk | Subclinical mastitis milk | Cut-off points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Somatic cell count (×105 cells ml−1) | 0.98*±0.037 | 2.58**±0.056 | - |
| Cu (ppm) | 0.381±0.032 | 0.397±0.015 | - |
| Fe (ppm) | 3.05*±0.23 | 5.18**±0.09 | 5.20 |
| Zn (ppm) | 3.57*±0.27 | 5.98**±0.18 | 6.01 |
| Mn (ppm) | 0.56±0.11 | 0.57±0.02 | - |
| Co (ppm) | 0.029*±0.019 | 0.096**±0.017 | 0.099 |
| LDH (U/L) | 96.64*±31.64 | 263.10**±18.95 | 266.11 |
| ALP (U/L) | 284.50*±31.57 | 808.29**±22.61 | 811.12 |
| AST (U/L) | 23.32±1.35 | 22.87±1.02 | - |
Mean having different superscripts * and ** horizontally differ significantly (p<0.01).
Prevalence of bacterial agents in subclinical mastitis milk of riverine buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)
| Genus | Animal | Quarters | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| 119 | 44 | 223 | 45 | |
| 95 | 35 | 169 | 34 | |
| 49 | 18 | 84 | 17 | |
| Others ( | 8 | 3 | 20 | 4 |
| Total | 271 | 100 | 496 | 100 |
Evaluation of Fe, Zn, Co, LDH and ALP as an indicator for diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in riverine buffalo
| Name of the parameter | Total samples examined (N) | Test positive samples (a+b) | Test reaction as compared to cultural examination | Percent sensitivity a/(a+d) ×100 | Percent specificity c/(b+c) ×100 | Percent accuracy (a+c)/N×100 | Positive predictive value (%)a/(a+b) ×100 | Negative predictive value (%)c/(c+d) ×100 | Likelihood ratio (positive) sensitivity/(100-specificity) | Likelihood ration (negative) (100-sensitivity)/specificity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||||||
| True positive (a) | False positive (b) | True negative (c) | False negative (d) | ||||||||||
| Fe | 2,048 | 253 | 172 | 81 | 1,471 | 324 | 34.67 | 94.78 | 80.22 | 67.98 | 94.78 | 6.64 | 0.69 |
| Zn | 2,048 | 465 | 372 | 93 | 1,459 | 124 | 75.0 | 94.01 | 89.40 | 80.00 | 92.17 | 12.52 | 0.02 |
| Co | 2,048 | 267 | 152 | 115 | 1,437 | 344 | 30.64 | 92.59 | 77.59 | 56.93 | 80.69 | 4.13 | 0.75 |
| LDH | 2,048 | 287 | 170 | 117 | 1,435 | 326 | 34.27 | 92.46 | 78.37 | 59.23 | 81.49 | 4.55 | 0.71 |
| ALP | 2,048 | 484 | 407 | 77 | 1,475 | 89 | 82.06 | 95.04 | 91.89 | 84.09 | 94.31 | 16.54 | 0.19 |
| Zn+ALP | 2,048 | 497 | 493 | 4 | 1,548 | 3 | 99.20 | 99.74 | 99.65 | 99.19 | 99.81 | 381.54 | 8.02×10−3 |
| Positive bacterial culture and SCC≥2×105 cells/ml | 2,048 | 496 | 496 | - | 1,552 | - | 100 | 100 | 100 | - | - | - | - |
Evaluation of Fe, Zn, Co, LDH and ALP as an indicator for diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in riverine buffalo caused by gram positive bacteria only
| Name of the parameter | Total samples examined (N) | Test positive samples (a+b) | Test reaction as compared to cultural examination | Percent sensitivity a/(a+d) ×100 | Percent specificity c/(b+c) ×100 | Percent accuracy (a+c)/N×100 | Positive predictive value (%)a/(a+b) | Negative predictive value (%)c/(c+d) | Likelihood ratio (positive) sensitivity/(100-specificity) | Likelihood ration (negative) (100-sensitivity)/specificity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||||||
| True positive (a) | False positive (b) | True negative (c) | False negative (d) | ||||||||||
| Fe | 1,964 | 369 | 305 | 64 | 1,488 | 107 | 74.03 | 95.88 | 92.29 | 82.66 | 93.29 | 17.96 | 0.27 |
| Zn | 1,964 | 392 | 366 | 26 | 1,526 | 46 | 88.83 | 98.32 | 96.33 | 93.37 | 97.07 | 52.88 | 0.12 |
| Co | 1,964 | 378 | 338 | 40 | 1,512 | 74 | 82.03 | 97.42 | 94.20 | 89.42 | 95.33 | 31.79 | 0.18 |
| LDH | 1,964 | 385 | 352 | 33 | 1,519 | 60 | 85.44 | 97.87 | 95.26 | 91.43 | 96.20 | 40.11 | 0.15 |
| ALP | 1,964 | 398 | 376 | 22 | 1,530 | 36 | 91.26 | 98.58 | 97.04 | 94.47 | 97.70 | 64.27 | 0.09 |
| Positive bacterial culture and SCC≥2×105 cells/ml | 1,964 | 412 | 412 | - | 1,552 | - | 100 | 100 | 100 | - | - | - | - |
Correlation coefficient of milk biochemical components in normal and SCM milk of riverine buffalo (n = 496)
| Log10 SCC | Fe | Zn | Co | LDH | ALP | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Normal milk | SCM milk | Normal milk | SCM milk | Normal milk | SCM milk | Normal milk | SCM milk | Normal milk | SCM milk | Normal milk | SCM milk | |
| Log10 SCC | - | - | -0.033 | −0.017 | −0.041 | 0.020 | 0.033 | |||||
| Fe | - | - | - | - | 0.084 | 0.059 | −0.044 | 0.098 | 0.045 | 0.092 | 0.041 | 0.058 |
| Zn | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.017 | 0.055 | 0.067 | 0.025 | 0.088 | |
| Co | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | −0.033 | 0.041 | −0.077 | 0.096 |
| LDH | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.065 | 0.109 |
Indicate significant at p<0.05 and
indicate significant at p<0.01.
N.B. Cu, Mn and AST were not considered as they showed insignificant changes in normal and SCM milk.
Figure 1The scattered plot diagram of Zinc vs. Alkaline phosphatase concentration in healthy buffalo milk.
Figure 2The scattered plot diagram of Zinc vs. Alkaline phosphatase concentration in subclinical mastitis buffalo milk.