Paritosh Kaul1, Jennifer Gong2, Gretchen Guiton3, Adam Rosenberg4, Gwyn Barley2. 1. Section of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. Electronic address: paritosh.kaul@childrenscolorado.org. 2. Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. 4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare third-year pediatric resident competence on an adolescent medicine with competence in treating younger children. METHODS: The participants were third-year residents (2010 [n = 24] and 2011 [n = 23]) at University of Colorado School of Medicine. Resident competence was measured in the domains of professionalism, communication, and history-taking skills in a multicase Objective Structured Clinical Examination. RESULTS: Percent correct scores in professionalism, history-taking, and communication skills on the adolescent case ranked in the bottom half of cases in both years. T-tests comparing mean score difference between the adolescent case and pediatric cases combined were statistically significant for professionalism (79.57 ± 4.15 vs. 89.51 ± 14.14, p = .01) and history taking (66.27 ± 11.02 vs. 75.10 ± 18.40, p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Resident's history taking addressed immediate issues but not public health issues with adolescents. The professionalism findings suggest that residents engage in less patient-centered care when caring for adolescents, even while their communication skills remain on par.
PURPOSE: To compare third-year pediatric resident competence on an adolescent medicine with competence in treating younger children. METHODS: The participants were third-year residents (2010 [n = 24] and 2011 [n = 23]) at University of Colorado School of Medicine. Resident competence was measured in the domains of professionalism, communication, and history-taking skills in a multicase Objective Structured Clinical Examination. RESULTS: Percent correct scores in professionalism, history-taking, and communication skills on the adolescent case ranked in the bottom half of cases in both years. T-tests comparing mean score difference between the adolescent case and pediatric cases combined were statistically significant for professionalism (79.57 ± 4.15 vs. 89.51 ± 14.14, p = .01) and history taking (66.27 ± 11.02 vs. 75.10 ± 18.40, p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Resident's history taking addressed immediate issues but not public health issues with adolescents. The professionalism findings suggest that residents engage in less patient-centered care when caring for adolescents, even while their communication skills remain on par.
Authors: David Córdova; Frania Mendoza Lua; Lauretta Ovadje; Kathryn Fessler; José A Bauermeister; Christopher P Salas-Wright; Michael G Vaughn; Youth Leadership Council Journal: Health Commun Date: 2017-07-07