Literature DB >> 25048955

Secondary prevention and health promotion after stroke: can it be enhanced?

Ann-Cathrin Jönsson1, Peter Höglund2, Marco Brizzi3, Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen3.   

Abstract

The aim was to study if health outcome and secondary prevention were satisfactory 1 year after stroke and if nurse-led interventions 3 months after stroke could have impact. Design was a randomized controlled open trial in a 1-year population. Primary outcome was health status 1 year after stroke. One month after stroke, survivors were randomized into intervention group (IG) with follow-up by a specialist nurse (SN) after 3 months (n = 232), and control group (CG) with standard care (n = 227), all to be followed up 1 year after stroke. At the first follow-up, patients graded their health, replied to the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) health outcome questions, health problems were assessed, and supportive counseling was provided in the IG. Health problems requiring medical interventions were primarily referred to a general practitioner (GP). One year after stroke, 391 survivors were followed up. Systolic blood pressure (BP) had decreased in IG (n = 194) from median 140 to 135 (P = .05), but about half were above the limit 139 in both groups. A larger proportion (22%) had systolic BP >155 in the CG (n = 197) than in the IG (14%; P = .05). In the IG, 62% needed referrals compared with the 75% in the CG (P = .009). Forty percent in the IG and 52.5% in the CG (P = .04) reported anxiety/depression. In the IG, 75% and 67% in the CG rated their general health as fairly good or very good (P = .05). Although nurse-led interventions could have some effect, the results were not optimal. A more powerful strategy could be closer collaboration between the SN and a stroke clinician, before referring to primary care.
Copyright © 2014 National Stroke Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health promotion; nurse's role; referral and consultation; risk factors; secondary prevention; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25048955     DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1052-3057            Impact factor:   2.136


  4 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for improving modifiable risk factor control in the secondary prevention of stroke.

Authors:  Bernadeta Bridgwood; Kate E Lager; Amit K Mistri; Kamlesh Khunti; Andrew D Wilson; Priya Modi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-07

Review 2.  Preventive Approaches for Post-Stroke Depression: Where Do We Stand? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Warunya Woranush; Mats Leif Moskopp; Annahita Sedghi; Isabella Stuckart; Thomas Noll; Kristian Barlinn; Timo Siepmann
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 2.570

3.  Controlled Education of patients after Stroke (CEOPS)- nurse-led multimodal and long-term interventional program involving a patient's caregiver to optimize secondary prevention of stroke: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Mendyk; Alain Duhamel; Yannick Bejot; Didier Leys; Laurent Derex; Olivier Dereeper; Olivier Detante; Pierre-Yves Garcia; Olivier Godefroy; Francisco Macian Montoro; Jean-Philippe Neau; Sébastien Richard; Thierry Rosolacci; Igor Sibon; Denis Sablot; Serge Timsit; Mathieu Zuber; Charlotte Cordonnier; Régis Bordet
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Long-term, telephone-based follow-up after stroke and TIA improves risk factors: 36-month results from the randomized controlled NAILED stroke risk factor trial.

Authors:  Joachim Ögren; Anna-Lotta Irewall; Lars Söderström; Thomas Mooe
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.474

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.