Norah A Terrault1, Tarek Hassanein2, Charles D Howell3, Shobha Joshi4, John Lake5, Linda Sher6, Hugo Vargas7, Joe McIntosh8, Shande Tang8, Tim M Jenkins9. 1. University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States. Electronic address: norah.terrault@ucsf.edu. 2. Southern California Liver Centers, Coronado, CA, United States. 3. University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States. 4. Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, United States. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States. 6. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States. 7. Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, United States. 8. Eisai Corporation of North America, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, United States. 9. Eisai Ltd, Hatfield, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: This is a phase II multicentre study to investigate the efficacy and safety of avatrombopag (E5501), an investigational second-generation thrombopoietin receptor agonist, administered one week prior to elective procedures in patients with thrombocytopenia secondary to cirrhosis. METHODS:Adults with cirrhosis and platelet counts ⩾10 to ⩽58×10(9)/L were randomized to placebo or avatrombopag in two sequential cohorts. Cohort A: placebo vs. one of 3 different doses (100mg loading dose followed by 20, 40, or 80 mg/day on days 2-7) of a first-generation avatrombopag formulation. Cohort B: placebo vs. one of 2 different doses (80 mg loading dose followed by 10 mg/day for days 2-7, or 20mg/day for days 2-4) of a second-generation avatrombopag formulation. Primary end point was achievement of a platelet increase of ⩾20×10(9)/L from baseline and >50×10(9)/L at least once during days 4-8. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were randomized: 93 patients (51, cohort A; 42, cohort B) to avatrombopag and 37 (16, cohort A; 21 cohort B) to placebo. The primary end point was achieved by 49.0% of treated patients in cohort A and 47.6% in cohort B compared to 6.3% and 9.5% of controls; a dose response was seen. Each avatrombopag regimen had a higher proportion of responders compared with their respective cohort placebo arms (p<0.01), except for the 100/40 mg group in cohort A (p=0.17). The most common adverse events were nausea, fatigue, and headache. One patient in the (100/80) avatrombopag group, without a Doppler assessment at screening was diagnosed with portal vein thrombosis during post-treatment follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this study avatrombopag was generally well-tolerated and increased platelet counts in patients with cirrhosis undergoing elective invasive procedures.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND & AIMS: This is a phase II multicentre study to investigate the efficacy and safety of avatrombopag (E5501), an investigational second-generation thrombopoietin receptor agonist, administered one week prior to elective procedures in patients with thrombocytopenia secondary to cirrhosis. METHODS: Adults with cirrhosis and platelet counts ⩾10 to ⩽58×10(9)/L were randomized to placebo or avatrombopag in two sequential cohorts. Cohort A: placebo vs. one of 3 different doses (100mg loading dose followed by 20, 40, or 80 mg/day on days 2-7) of a first-generation avatrombopag formulation. Cohort B: placebo vs. one of 2 different doses (80 mg loading dose followed by 10 mg/day for days 2-7, or 20mg/day for days 2-4) of a second-generation avatrombopag formulation. Primary end point was achievement of a platelet increase of ⩾20×10(9)/L from baseline and >50×10(9)/L at least once during days 4-8. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were randomized: 93 patients (51, cohort A; 42, cohort B) to avatrombopag and 37 (16, cohort A; 21 cohort B) to placebo. The primary end point was achieved by 49.0% of treated patients in cohort A and 47.6% in cohort B compared to 6.3% and 9.5% of controls; a dose response was seen. Each avatrombopag regimen had a higher proportion of responders compared with their respective cohort placebo arms (p<0.01), except for the 100/40 mg group in cohort A (p=0.17). The most common adverse events were nausea, fatigue, and headache. One patient in the (100/80) avatrombopag group, without a Doppler assessment at screening was diagnosed with portal vein thrombosis during post-treatment follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this study avatrombopag was generally well-tolerated and increased platelet counts in patients with cirrhosis undergoing elective invasive procedures.
Authors: Ingrid Lindquist; Sven R Olson; Ang Li; Hanny Al-Samkari; Janice H Jou; Owen J T McCarty; Joseph J Shatzel Journal: Platelets Date: 2021-01-18 Impact factor: 3.862