Literature DB >> 25047659

Use of a web-based survey to facilitate shared decision making for patients eligible for cancer screening.

Charles D Brackett1, Stephen Kearing.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to facilitate shared decision making (SDM) during preventive visits by utilizing a web-based survey system to offer colorectal cancer (CRC) and prostate cancer screening decision aids (DAs) to appropriately identified patients prior to the visit.
METHODS: Patients completed a web-based questionnaire before their preventive medicine appointment. Age- and gender-appropriate patients completed additional questions to determine eligibility for CRC or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. Eligible patients were offered a choice of video or print DA, and completed questions assessing their knowledge, values, and preferences regarding the screening decision. Responses were summarized and fed forward to clinician and patient reports.
RESULTS: Overall, 11,493 CRC and 4,384 PSA questionnaires were completed. Patient responses were used to identify those eligible for cancer-screening DAs: 2,187 (19 %) for CRC and 2,962 (68 %) for PSA; 15 % of eligible patients requested a DA. Many patients declined a DA because they indicated they "already know enough to make their decision" (34 % for CRC, 46 % for PSA).
CONCLUSION: A web-based questionnaire provides an efficient means to identify patients eligible for cancer screening decisions and to offer them DAs before an appointment. Pre-visit use of DAs along with reports giving feedback to patients and clinicians provides an opportunity for SDM to occur at the visit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25047659     DOI: 10.1007/s40271-014-0079-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN: 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


  13 in total

1.  Risk communication in practice: the contribution of decision aids.

Authors:  Annette M O'Connor; France Légaré; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-27

2.  Policy support for patient-centered care: the need for measurable improvements in decision quality.

Authors:  Karen R Sepucha; Floyd J Fowler; Albert G Mulley
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Screening for prostate cancer. American College of Physicians.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) best practice policy. American Urological Association (AUA).

Authors: 
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.990

Review 6.  Health decision aids to facilitate shared decision making in office practice.

Authors:  Michael J Barry
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 7.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Carol L Bennett; Michael J Barry; Nananda F Col; Karen B Eden; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Anne Lyddiatt; France Légaré; Richard Thomson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-10-05

8.  Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; Floyd J Fowler; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Watchful waiting vs immediate transurethral resection for symptomatic prostatism. The importance of patients' preferences.

Authors:  M J Barry; A G Mulley; F J Fowler; J W Wennberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Authoritarian physicians and patients' fear of being labeled 'difficult' among key obstacles to shared decision making.

Authors:  Dominick L Frosch; Suepattra G May; Katharine A S Rendle; Caroline Tietbohl; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 6.301

View more
  3 in total

1.  Applied techniques for putting pre-visit planning in clinical practice to empower patient-centered care in the pandemic era: a systematic review and framework suggestion.

Authors:  Marsa Gholamzadeh; Hamidreza Abtahi; Marjan Ghazisaeeidi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 2.  The Shared Decision-Making Process in the Pharmacological Management of Depression.

Authors:  Malcom Hopwood
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Implementing a patient decision aid, a process evaluation of a large-scale pre- and post-implementation trial.

Authors:  D B Raphael Daniela; N S Russell; E van Werkhoven; J M Immink; D P G Westhoff; M C Stenfert Kroese; M R Stam; L M van Maurik; C M J van Gestel; T van der Weijden; L J Boersma
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.872

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.