Literature DB >> 25047477

Treatment of clinical T2N0M0 esophageal cancer.

Thomas J Hardacker1, DuyKhanh Ceppa, Ikenna Okereke, Karen M Rieger, Shadia I Jalal, Julia K LeBlanc, John M DeWitt, Kenneth A Kesler, Thomas J Birdas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Management of clinical T2N0M0 (cT2N0M0) esophageal cancer remains controversial. We reviewed our institutional experience over 21 years (1990-2011) to determine clinical staging accuracy, optimal treatment approaches, and factors predictive of survival in this patient population.
METHODS: Patients with cT2N0M0 esophageal cancer determined by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) were identified through a prospectively collected database. Demographics, perioperative data, and outcomes were examined. Cox regression model and Kaplan-Meier plots were used for statistical survival analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 731 patients underwent esophagectomy, of whom 68 cT2N0M0 patients (9 %) were identified. Fifty-seven patients (84 %) had adenocarcinoma. Thirty-three patients (48.5 %) were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery, and 35 underwent surgical resection alone. All resections except one included a transthoracic approach with two-field lymph node dissection. Thirty-day operative mortality was 2.9 %. Only 3 patients (8.5 %) who underwent surgery alone had T2N0M0 disease identified by pathology: the disease of 15 (42.8 %) was found to be overstaged and 17 (48.5 %) understaged after surgery. Understaging was more common in poorly differentiated tumors (p = 0.03). Nine patients (27.2 %) had complete pathologic response after chemoradiotherapy. Absence of lymph node metastases (pN0) was significantly more frequent in the neoadjuvant group (29 of 33 vs. 21 of 35, p = 0.01). Median follow-up was 44.2 months. Overall 5-year survival was 50.8 %. On multivariate analysis, adenocarcinoma (p = 0.001) and pN0 after resection (p = 0.01) were significant predictors of survival.
CONCLUSIONS: EUS was inaccurate in staging cT2N0M0 esophageal cancer in this study. Poorly differentiated tumors were more frequently understaged. Adenocarcinoma and absence of lymph node metastases (pN0) were independently predictive of long-term survival. pN0 status was significantly more common in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, but long-term survival was not affected by neoadjuvant therapy. A strategy of neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection may be optimal in this group, especially in patients with disease likely to be understaged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25047477     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3929-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  12 in total

1.  8th edition AJCC/UICC staging of cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: application to clinical practice.

Authors:  Thomas W Rice; Deepa T Patil; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-03

2.  Precision Surgical Therapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction.

Authors:  Thomas W Rice; Min Lu; Hemant Ishwaran; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  Comparative effectiveness of upfront esophagectomy versus induction chemoradiation in clinical stage T2N0 esophageal cancer: A decision analysis.

Authors:  Tara R Semenkovich; Roheena Z Panni; Jessica L Hudson; Theodore Thomas; Leisha C Elmore; Su-Hsin Chang; Bryan F Meyers; Benjamin D Kozower; Varun Puri
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 4.  Management of clinical T2N0 esophageal cancer: a review.

Authors:  Patrick Vining; Thomas J Birdas
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Clinical T2N0 Esophageal Cancer: Identifying Pretreatment Characteristics Associated With Pathologic Upstaging and the Potential Role for Induction Therapy.

Authors:  Pamela Samson; Varun Puri; Clifford Robinson; Craig Lockhart; Danielle Carpenter; Stephen Broderick; Daniel Kreisel; A Sasha Krupnick; G Alexander Patterson; Bryan Meyers; Traves Crabtree
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Optimal Treatment of cT2N0 Esophageal Carcinoma: Is Upfront Surgery Really the Way?

Authors:  Giovanni Capovilla; Lucia Moletta; Elisa Sefora Pierobon; Renato Salvador; Luca Provenzano; Gianpietro Zanchettin; Mario Costantini; Stefano Merigliano; Michele Valmasoni
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Patterns of Use of Induction Therapy for T2N0 Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Kristen E Rhodin; Vignesh Raman; Oliver K Jawitz; Soraya L Voigt; Norma E Farrow; David H Harpole; Betty C Tong; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound staging for T2N0 esophageal cancer: a National Cancer Database analysis.

Authors:  Ravi Shridhar; Jamie Huston; Kenneth L Meredith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-10

Review 9.  Multidisciplinary management for esophageal and gastric cancer.

Authors:  Megan M Boniface; Sachin B Wani; Tracey E Schefter; Phillip J Koo; Cheryl Meguid; Stephen Leong; Jeffrey B Kaplan; Lisa J Wingrove; Martin D McCarter
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 10.  Induction therapy for clinical stage T2N0M0 esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hong-Wei Lv; Wen-Qun Xing; Si-Ning Shen; Ji-Wei Cheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.