Literature DB >> 25047308

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic treatment of varicocele in adolescents: Comparison between two techniques.

Antonio Marte1, Lucia Pintozzi, Silvia Cavaiuolo, Pio Parmeggiani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has gained great popularity in paediatric surgery due to its minimally invasive approach and improved cosmetic results. Notwithstanding, reports describing its adoption in children are still fragmentary and some perplexities have been raised by some surgeons. We reviewed our experience with the SILS Palomo varicocelectomy procedure (SIL-V) in children and adolescents, comparing this group with a similar series operated using conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy (CL-V). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 69 Palomo laparoscopic varicocelectomies were performed in patients aged 11-17 years from January 2011 to January 2013. Indications for surgery included grades II-III varicocele or ipsilateral testicular hypotrophy. The SIL-V procedure was performed in 44 patients with roticulating and conventional 5 mm instruments. Testicular vessels were isolated "en bloc," clipped and cut. Operating time, visual analogue scale and post-operative results were compared to a similar group of 25 patients operated with CL-V.
RESULTS: No patient of the SIL-V group required conversion to conventional laparoscopy, none to open surgery. Mean operative time was 22 min (range: 19-28) in the SIL-V group, not significantly different compared with CL-V (mean 21 min, range: 18-25). All patients experienced a smooth recovery from surgery without any complications, and were discharged on day 1. No difficulties were found in the SIL-V group. The post-operative pain score was significantly better in SIL-V.
CONCLUSION: The SIL-V procedure is safe and effective and allows a fast and efficient isolation of the vascular bundle. The use of conventional instruments is technically feasible in SIL-V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25047308     DOI: 10.4103/0189-6725.137325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg        ISSN: 0974-5998


  5 in total

1.  Outcome of Gynecologic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery with a Homemade Device and Conventional Laparoscopic Instruments in a Chinese Teaching Hospital.

Authors:  Xianghui Su; Xiaolong Jin; Canliang Wen; Qiong Xu; Chunfang Cai; Zhuohui Zhong; Xiang Tang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  The history of varicocele: from antiquity to the modern ERA.

Authors:  Antonio Marte
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 3.  Laparoendoscopic single-site varicocelectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Xi Duan; Xuesong Yang; Xianzhong Deng; Shu Cui
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-09-05

4.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery varicocelectomy versus conventional laparoscopic varicocele ligation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mingchao Li; Zhengyun Wang; Hao Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 5.  Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zheng Zhang; Shu-Juan Zheng; Wen Yu; You-Feng Han; Hai Chen; Yun Chen; Yu-Tian Dai
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.