Literature DB >> 25046691

Coexisting prostate cancer found at the time of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: predicting its presence and grade in analyzed tissue.

Naeem Bhojani1, Ronald S Boris, M Francesca Monn, Jessica A Mandeville, James E Lingeman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of prostate cancer identified on holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) specimens and evaluate variables associated with prostate cancer identification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing HoLEP between 1998 and 2013 were identified. Patients with a known history of prostate cancer were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression assessed variables associated with identification of prostate cancer on HoLEP specimens and Gleason 7 or higher prostate cancer among the malignant cases. The Gleason grade was used as a proxy for disease severity. Each of the models was adjusted for age, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and HoLEP specimen weight.
RESULTS: The cohort comprised 1272 patients, of whom 103 (8.1%) had prostate cancer identified. Prostate cancer cases had higher pre-HoLEP PSA (p=0.06) but lower HoLEP specimen weight (p=0.01). On multivariate logistic regression, age and preoperative PSA were associated with increased odds of prostate cancer being present (p<0.01 each), while increasing HoLEP specimen weight was associated with decreased odds of prostate cancer (p<0.001). Men older than 80 had 20% predicted probability of being diagnosed with prostate cancer. Seventy-eight percent of prostate cancer cases were Gleason 6 or less. The pre-HoLEP PSA was associated with increased adjusted odds of intermediate- or high-grade prostate cancer.
CONCLUSION: Prostate cancer identified by HoLEP is not uncommon, but is generally a low-risk disease. Older patients with smaller prostate glands have the highest odds of prostate cancer identification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25046691     DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  9 in total

1.  HoLEP provides a higher prostate cancer detection rate compared to bipolar TURP: a matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Bernd Rosenhammer; Eva M Lausenmeyer; Roman Mayr; Maximilian Burger; Christian Eichelberg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Does mechanical morcellation of large glands compromise incidental prostate cancer detection on specimen analysis? A pathological comparison with open simple prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vincent Misraï; Sébastien Kerever; Marie Pasquie; Benoit Bordier; Julien Guillotreau; Julien Palasse; Virginie Guillotreau; Enrique Rijo; Sébastien Vincendeau; Romain Huet; Romain Mathieu; Benoit Peyronnet; Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq; Eva-Maria Compérat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  "Finding the needle in a haystack": oncologic evaluation of patients treated for LUTS with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

Authors:  Annika Herlemann; Kerstin Wegner; Alexander Roosen; Alexander Buchner; Philipp Weinhold; Alexander Bachmann; Christian G Stief; Christian Gratzke; Giuseppe Magistro
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Aquablation among novice users in Canada: A WATER II subpopulation analysis.

Authors:  Kevin C Zorn; S Larry Goldenberg; Ryan Paterson; Alan So; Dean Elterman; Naeem Bhojani
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: patient selection and perspectives.

Authors:  Tracy Marien; Mustafa Kadihasanoglu; Nicole L Miller
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2016-10-21

6.  Preoperative multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging: a safe clinical practice to reduce incidental prostate cancer in Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

Authors:  Angelo Porreca; Marco Giampaoli; Lorenzo Bianchi; Daniele D'Agostino; Daniele Romagnoli; Federico Mineo Bianchi; Alessandro Del Rosso; Paolo Corsi; Riccardo Schiavina; Walter Artibani; Eugenio Brunocilla
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2019-04-24

7.  Incidental Prostate Cancer from Prostate with Benign Biopsies: A Predictive and Survival Analysis from Cohort Study.

Authors:  Che Hsueh Yang; Yi Sheng Lin; Wei Chun Weng; Chao Yu Hsu; Min Che Tung; Yen Chuan Ou
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-03-10

8.  Clinical Implications of Nadir Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels After Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate.

Authors:  Yung-Ting Cheng; Jian-Hua Hong; Yu-Chuan Lu; Yi-Kai Chang; Shih-Chun Hung; Kuo-Kang Feng; Shih-Ping Liu; Po-Ming Chow; Hong-Chiang Chang; Chung-Hsin Chen; Yeong-Shiau Pu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 5.738

9.  The significance of the extent of tissue embedding for the detection of incidental prostate carcinoma on transurethral prostate resection material: the more, the better?

Authors:  Jens Köllermann; Benedikt Hoeh; Daniel Ruppel; Kevin Smith; Henning Reis; Mike Wenzel; Felix Preisser; Marina Kosiba; Philipp Mandel; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Andreas Becker; Felix K H Chun; Peter Wild; Luis A Kluth
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.535

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.