Literature DB >> 25046617

Primary and reoperative hypospadias repair in adults--are results different than in children?

Warren Snodgrass1, Carlos Villanueva2, Nicol Bush2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is widespread belief that hypospadias surgery in adults has a greater urethroplasty complication rate than similar repair in children. We compared outcomes of primary and reoperative hypospadias repair in adults vs children.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated prospectively maintained databases of consecutive boys and adults, defined as Tanner 4 or greater, treated with primary or reoperative hypospadias repair from 2000 to 2013. We searched for urethroplasty complications, including fistula, glans dehiscence, stricture/stenosis and diverticulum. All operations were done with the goal of creating a neomeatus at the normal location at the tip of the glans. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done to determine whether pubertal status impacted urethroplasty complications.
RESULTS: A total of 1,140 patients were operated on by a single surgeon, including 69 adults with a mean age of 23 years. Complications developed in 209 cases (18%), including 124 of 883 primary repairs (14%) and 85 of 257 reoperations (33%). There was no difference in outcomes between adults and children. Complications were noted in 1 of 8 men (12.5%) vs 123 of 871 children (14%) with primary repair (p = 0.9) and in 16 of 61 (26%) vs 69 of 196 (35%) with reoperation (p = 0.2). Multivariate analysis showed that a proximal meatus and reoperation were risk factors for complications but not pubertal status.
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to popular belief, our data do not indicate a greater risk for urethroplasty complications after hypospadias surgery performed in adulthood. Repair in adults can be done using the same techniques as in children with the same goal of a neomeatus at the tip of the glans.
Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adult; hypospadias; penis; reconstructive surgical procedures; urethra

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25046617     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

Review 1.  Transitioning patients with hypospadias and other penile abnormalities to adulthood: What to expect?

Authors:  Keith Rourke; Luis H Braga
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Canadian Urological Association guideline on male urethral stricture.

Authors:  Keith F Rourke; Blayne Welk; Ron Kodama; Greg Bailly; Tim Davies; Nancy Santesso; Philippe D Violette
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.052

Review 3.  Recent advances in understanding/management of hypospadias.

Authors:  Warren Snodgrass; Nicol Bush
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2014-11-04

4.  The success of tubularized-incised plate urethroplasty in adults and children.

Authors:  Haci Polat; Umut Gulacti; Alper Gok; Mehmet Ozgur Yucel; Ali Cift; Ugur Lok; Can Benlioglu
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-05-27

Review 5.  Hypospadias, all there is to know.

Authors:  H J R van der Horst; L L de Wall
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Craniofacial anomalies associated with hypospadias. Description of a hospital based population in South America.

Authors:  Nicolas Fernandez; Rebeca Escobar; Ignacio Zarante
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

7.  Hypospadias repair during adulthood: Case series.

Authors:  Waleed M AlTaweel; Raouf M Seyam
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

Review 8.  Management of the patient with failed hypospadias surgery presenting in adulthood.

Authors:  Reem Aldamanhori; Christopher R Chapple
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-10-26

9.  The risk factors of Urethrocutaneous fistula after hypospadias surgery in the youth population.

Authors:  Xujun Sheng; Ding Xu; Yu Wu; Yongjiang Yu; Jianhua Chen; Jun Qi
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.264

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.