Literature DB >> 25046348

Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement.

Gregorios A Paspatis1, Jean-Marc Dumonceau, Marc Barthet2, Søren Meisner3, Alessandro Repici4, Brian P Saunders5, Antonios Vezakis6, Jean Michel Gonzalez2, Stine Ydegaard Turino3, Zacharias P Tsiamoulos5, Paul Fockens7, Cesare Hassan8.   

Abstract

This Position Paper is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). It addresses the diagnosis and management of iatrogenic perforation occurring during diagnostic or therapeutic digestive endoscopic procedures. Main recommendations 1 ESGE recommends that each center implements a written policy regarding the management of iatrogenic perforation, including the definition of procedures that carry a high risk of this complication. This policy should be shared with the radiologists and surgeons at each center. 2 In the case of an endoscopically identified perforation, ESGE recommends that the endoscopist reports: its size and location with a picture; endoscopic treatment that might have been possible; whether carbon dioxide or air was used for insufflation; and the standard report information. 3 ESGE recommends that symptoms or signs suggestive of iatrogenic perforation after an endoscopic procedure should be carefully evaluated and documented, possibly with a computed tomography (CT) scan, in order to prevent any diagnostic delay. 4 ESGE recommends that endoscopic closure should be considered depending on the type of perforation, its size, and the endoscopist expertise available at the center. A switch to carbon dioxide insufflation, the diversion of luminal content, and decompression of tension pneumoperitoneum or tension pneumothorax should also be done. 5 After closure of an iatrogenic perforation using an endoscopic method, ESGE recommends that further management should be based on the estimated success of the endoscopic closure and on the general clinical condition of the patient. In the case of no or failed endoscopic closure of the iatrogenic perforation, and in patients whose clinical condition is deteriorating, hospitalization and surgical consultation are recommended. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25046348     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  90 in total

1.  Risk of infection after iatrogenic perforation of the gut wall? Evaluation of preventive strategies in a randomized controlled animal trial.

Authors:  Mark Ellrichmann; Shantiswaroop Dhar; Klaus-Gerd Hadeler; Frauke Seehusen; Tamzin Cuming; Andrea T Feßler; Heiner Niemann; Stefan Schwarz; Annette Fritscher-Ravens
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Endoscopic full-thickness resection: Current status.

Authors:  Arthur Schmidt; Benjamin Meier; Karel Caca
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Role of endoscopic clipping in the treatment of oesophageal perforations.

Authors:  György Lázár; Attila Paszt; Eszter Mán
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-01-10

4.  Pre-clinical study on a telemetric gastric sensor for recognition of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: the "HemoPill monitor".

Authors:  Sebastian Schostek; Melanie Zimmermann; Jan Keller; Mario Fode; Michael Melbert; Ruediger L Prosst; Thomas Gottwald; Marc O Schurr
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Endoscopic management of perforations, leaks and fistulas.

Authors:  Ritu Raj Singh; Jeremy S Nussbaum; Nikhil A Kumta
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-10-31

6.  Application of novel endoloops to close the defects resulted from endoscopic full-thickness resection with single-channel gastroscope: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Dongtao Shi; Rui Li; Weichang Chen; Deqing Zhang; Lei Zhang; Rui Guo; Ping Yao; Xudong Wu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Outcome, comorbidity, hospitalization and 30-day mortality after closure of acute perforations and postoperative anastomotic leaks by the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) in an unselected cohort of patients.

Authors:  M Raithel; H Albrecht; W Scheppach; M Farnbacher; W Haupt; A F Hagel; V Schellerer; F Vitali; M F Neurath; H T Schneider
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Management of colonoscopic perforation: a systematic review and treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Khalid N Alsowaina; Mooyad A Ahmed; Nawar A Alkhamesi; Ahmad I Elnahas; Jeffrey D Hawel; Nitin V Khanna; Christopher M Schlachta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children: Retrospective series with a long-term follow-up and literature review.

Authors:  Yavor Asenov; Melih Akın; Serdar Cantez; Feryal Gün Soysal; Yaman Tekant
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  A comparison of two endoscopic closures: over-the-scope clip (OTSC) versus KING closure (endoloop + clips) in a randomized long-term experimental study.

Authors:  R Dolezel; O Ryska; M Kollar; J Juhasova; J Kalvach; M Ryska; J Martinek
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.