Literature DB >> 25046198

Cervical cancer screening at crossroads.

Elsebeth Lynge1, Carsten Rygaard, Miguel Vazquez-Prada Baillet, Pierre-Antoine Dugué, Bente Braad Sander, Jesper Bonde, Matejka Rebolj.   

Abstract

Cervical screening has been one of the most successful public health prevention programmes. For 50 years, cytology formed the basis for screening, and detected cervical intraepithelial lesions (CIN) were treated surgically to prevent progression to cancer. In a high-risk country as Denmark, screening decreased the incidence of cervical cancer from 34 to 11 per 100,000, age-standardized rate (World Standard Population). Screening is, however, also expensive; Denmark (population: 5.6 million) undertakes close to half a million tests per year, and has 6-8 CIN-treated women for each prevented cancer case. The discovery of human papillomavirus (HPV) as the cause of cervical cancer dramatically changed perspectives for disease control. Screening with HPV testing was launched around 1990, and preventive HPV vaccination was licensed in 2006. Long-term randomized controlled trials (RCT) demonstrated that HPV testing provides better protection against cervical cancer than cytology, but it requires extra repeated testing. HPV vaccination RCTs, furthermore, have proved that HPV vaccination protects against vaccine-type high-grade CIN in women vaccinated prior to sexual activity, but less so in women vaccinated later. The challenge now is therefore to find an algorithm for screening of a heterogeneous population including non-vaccinated women; women vaccinated prior to start of sexual activity; and women vaccinated later.
© 2014 APMIS. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervix uteri; cancer; cytology; human papillomavirus; screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25046198     DOI: 10.1111/apm.12279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APMIS        ISSN: 0903-4641            Impact factor:   3.205


  26 in total

1.  Chemoradiation therapy reduces aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 expression in cervical cancer but does not improve patient survival.

Authors:  Yin Lv; Lin Yang; Fan Wang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Comparison of Onclarity Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Assay with Hybrid Capture II HPV DNA Assay for Detection of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2 and 3 Lesions.

Authors:  F Bottari; M Sideri; C Gulmini; S Igidbashian; A Tricca; C Casadio; S Carinelli; S Boveri; D Ejegod; J Bonde; M T Sandri
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Eurogin Roadmap 2015: How has HPV knowledge changed our practice: Vaccines.

Authors:  Julia M L Brotherton; Mark Jit; Patti E Gravitt; Marc Brisson; Aimée R Kreimer; Sara I Pai; Carole Fakhry; Joseph Monsonego; Silvia Franceschi
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Impact of GP reminders on follow-up of abnormal cervical cytology: a before-after study in Danish general practice.

Authors:  Bettina Kjær Kristiansen; Berit Andersen; Flemming Bro; Hans Svanholm; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  [Nomenclature of squamous cell precursor lesions of the lower female genital tract : Current aspects].

Authors:  L-C Horn; C E Brambs; R Handzel; G Mehlhorn; D Schmidt; K Schierle
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  Potential predictive plasma biomarkers for cervical cancer by 2D-DIGE proteomics and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis.

Authors:  Xia Guo; Yi Hao; Mayila Kamilijiang; Axiangu Hasimu; Jianlin Yuan; Guizhen Wu; Halidan Reyimu; Nafeisha Kadeer; Abulizi Abudula
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-11-27

7.  Prediction of rehabilitation needs after treatment of cervical cancer: what do late adverse effects tell us?

Authors:  Tina Broby Mikkelsen; Bente Sørensen; Karin B Dieperink
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Study protocol of the CHOiCE trial: a three-armed, randomized, controlled trial of home-based HPV self-sampling for non-participants in an organized cervical cancer screening program.

Authors:  Mette Tranberg; Bodil Hammer Bech; Jan Blaakær; Jørgen Skov Jensen; Hans Svanholm; Berit Andersen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Effectiveness of cervical screening after age 60 years according to screening history: Nationwide cohort study in Sweden.

Authors:  Jiangrong Wang; Bengt Andrae; Karin Sundström; Alexander Ploner; Peter Ström; K Miriam Elfström; Joakim Dillner; Pär Sparén
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Differential proteins among normal cervix cells and cervical cancer cells with HPV-16 infection, through mass spectrometry-based Proteomics (2D-DIGE) in women from Southern México.

Authors:  Idanya Serafín-Higuera; Olga Lilia Garibay-Cerdenares; Berenice Illades-Aguiar; Eugenia Flores-Alfaro; Marco Antonio Jiménez-López; Pavel Sierra-Martínez; Luz Del Carmen Alarcón-Romero
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 2.480

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.