Literature DB >> 2504566

A US multicenter study of enprostil 35 micrograms twice daily for treatment of prepyloric, pyloric channel, and duodenal bulb ulcers. Enprostil Study Group.

T T Schubert1, J A Frizzell, P B Meier, R I Cano, K E Schwartz.   

Abstract

One hundred twenty-seven patients with endoscopically diagnosed active duodenal, pyloric, or prepyloric ulcers participated in this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial comparing placebo with enprostil 35 micrograms twice daily for up to four weeks. Cumulative endoscopic healing for the enprostil and placebo treatment groups, respectively, was 25% (15 of 59) and 12% (7 of 60) at two weeks (P = 0.060) and 59% (34 of 58) and 33% (19 of 57) at four weeks (P = 0.005). Excluding prepyloric ulcers, cumulative healing for the enprostil and placebo groups, respectively, was 22% (9 of 41) and 7% (3 of 44) at two weeks (P = 0.104) and 56% (23 of 41) and 24% (10 of 42) at four weeks (P = 0.002). A greater percentage of prepyloric ulcers healed on enprostil than placebo, but the difference was not significant. Mean antacid use in both groups was identical, averaging only two or less tablets per day in each group throughout the study. Daytime pain was relieved more quickly in the enprostil group, while median time to relief of nighttime pain was essentially identical in both groups. The most common side effect in the enprostil treatment group, diarrhea, was mostly mild to moderate in intensity and was generally self-limiting, requiring no specific therapy; no patient withdrew because of this complaint. Other symptoms and laboratory profiles were similar in the two groups. These results indicate that enprostil 35 micrograms taken twice daily for four weeks is effective and safe for the treatment of prepyloric, pyloric channel, and duodenal ulcers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2504566     DOI: 10.1007/bf01538068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  30 in total

1.  Comparison of enprostil and cimetidine in active duodenal ulcer disease. Summary of pooled European studies.

Authors:  L Winters
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-08-18       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Human duodenal mucosal bicarbonate secretion. Evidence for basal secretion and stimulation by hydrochloric acid and a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue.

Authors:  J I Isenberg; D L Hogan; M A Koss; J A Selling
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  A computer program for testing average partial association in three-way contingency tables (PARCAT).

Authors:  J R Landis; M M Cooper; T Kennedy; G G Koch
Journal:  Comput Programs Biomed       Date:  1979-05

Review 4.  Effect of cigarette smoking on gastrointestinal physiology and non-neoplastic digestive disease.

Authors:  J W Kikendall; J Evaul; L F Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.062

5.  A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials.

Authors:  P C O'Brien; T R Fleming
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Most patients with active symptomatic duodenal ulcers fail to develop ulcer-type pain in response to gastroduodenal acidification.

Authors:  A Harrison; J I Isenberg; M Schapira; L Hagie
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Cigarette smoking reduces human gastric luminal prostaglandin E2.

Authors:  D R McCready; L Clark; M M Cohen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Pathogenetic factors in peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  C T Richardson
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1985-08-30       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  A multicenter, double-blind trial of sucralfate and placebo in duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  G G McHardy
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 10.  Cimetidine. I. Developments, pharmacology, and efficacy.

Authors:  J W Freston
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  1 in total

1.  A comparison of two prostaglandin analogues (enprostil vs misoprostol) in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer disease.

Authors:  C K Ching; S K Lam
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.527

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.