Literature DB >> 25044974

The role of cytopathology and cyst fluid analysis in the preoperative diagnosis and management of pancreatic cysts >3 cm.

Ivan Chebib1, Kurt Yaeger, Mari Mino-Kenudson, Martha B Pitman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cyst size >3 cm is a worrisome rather than high-risk feature for malignancy based on the 2012 International Guidelines for the management of mucinous cysts. The value of cytology in preoperative evaluation and surgical triage is unclear.
METHODS: All pancreatic cysts >3 cm resected over a 7-year period were evaluated for clinical, radiologic, and pathologic information. Performance of cytology for the detection of malignancy and surgical triage compared with imaging was assessed.
RESULTS: There were 93 histologically confirmed cysts, 52 of which were mucinous and 41 of which were nonmucinous. Of these, 37% were malignant, including 16 nonmucinous malignancies and 18 mucinous cysts (12 with invasive carcinoma, 6 with high-grade dysplasia). Thirty-nine cysts (41% malignant, 59% benign) were not subject to endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) prior to resection (average size, 6.0 cm). Fifty-four were evaluated by EUS-FNA, with 35 available for review (average size, 5.4 cm). Cytology/cyst fluid analysis had the highest specificity (88.9%) compared with imaging, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed the highest sensitivity (100%). MRI had the highest predictive value for mucinous (100%) versus nonmucinous cysts (100%). MRI and EUS were able to predict malignancy from the presence of high-risk imaging features in all cases. Some benign cases also showed high-risk imaging features on MRI (28.6%), computed tomography (32.3%), and EUS (45.8%). Cytology correctly classified 5 of 6 benign cysts with high-risk imaging as benign.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cysts >3 cm is warranted, as many are nonmucinous cysts and not high-grade. Cytology is more specific than imaging for the detection of malignancy in cysts >3 cm.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cyst; cytology; endoscopic ultrasound; fine needle aspiration biopsy; intraductal; mucinous; neoplasm; pancreas; papillary

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25044974     DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol        ISSN: 1934-662X            Impact factor:   5.284


  7 in total

Review 1.  Endosonography in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cysts.

Authors:  Vivek Kadiyala; Linda S Lee
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-03-16

Review 2.  Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-17

Review 3.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of pancreatic cysts by combined cytopathology and cystic content analysis.

Authors:  Amanda K Martin; Zhongren Zhou
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-10-25

4.  Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration is useful in pancreatic cysts smaller than 3 cm.

Authors:  Sandra Faias; Marília Cravo; João Pereira da Silva; Paula Chaves; A Dias Pereira
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Use of a novel through-the-needle biopsy forceps in endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Mohammad H Shakhatreh; Sohrab Rahimi Naini; Alan A Brijbassie; Douglas J Grider; Perry Shen; Paul Yeaton
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-03-30

6.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology, viscosity, and carcinoembryonic antigen in pancreatic cyst fluid.

Authors:  Samer Alkaade; Elie Chahla; Michael Levy
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 5.628

7.  Quantitative proteomic analysis of pancreatic cyst fluid proteins associated with malignancy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

Authors:  Misol Do; Dohyun Han; Joseph Injae Wang; Hyunsoo Kim; Wooil Kwon; Youngmin Han; Jin-Young Jang; Youngsoo Kim
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.988

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.