Shu-Qiang Wang1,2, Xiang Li1, Jiao-Long Cui1, Han-Xiong Li3, Keith D K Luk1, Yong Hu1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. 2. Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China. 3. Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the use of a newly designed machine learning-based classifier in the automatic identification of myelopathic levels in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 58 normal volunteers and 16 subjects with CSM were recruited for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) acquisition. The eigenvalues were extracted as the selected features from DTI images. Three classifiers, naive Bayesian, support vector machine, and support tensor machine, and fractional anisotropy (FA) were employed to identify myelopathic levels. The results were compared with clinical level diagnosis results and accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated to evaluate the performance of the developed classifiers. RESULTS: The accuracy by support tensor machine was the highest (93.62%) among the three classifiers. The support tensor machine also showed excellent capacity to identify true positives (sensitivity: 84.62%) and true negatives (specificity: 97.06%). The accuracy by FA value was the lowest (76%) in all the methods. CONCLUSION: The classifiers-based method using eigenvalues had a better performance in identifying the levels of CSM than the diagnosis using FA values. The support tensor machine was the best among three classifiers.
PURPOSE: To investigate the use of a newly designed machine learning-based classifier in the automatic identification of myelopathic levels in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 58 normal volunteers and 16 subjects with CSM were recruited for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) acquisition. The eigenvalues were extracted as the selected features from DTI images. Three classifiers, naive Bayesian, support vector machine, and support tensor machine, and fractional anisotropy (FA) were employed to identify myelopathic levels. The results were compared with clinical level diagnosis results and accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated to evaluate the performance of the developed classifiers. RESULTS: The accuracy by support tensor machine was the highest (93.62%) among the three classifiers. The support tensor machine also showed excellent capacity to identify true positives (sensitivity: 84.62%) and true negatives (specificity: 97.06%). The accuracy by FA value was the lowest (76%) in all the methods. CONCLUSION: The classifiers-based method using eigenvalues had a better performance in identifying the levels of CSM than the diagnosis using FA values. The support tensor machine was the best among three classifiers.
Authors: Benjamin S Hopkins; Kenneth A Weber; Kartik Kesavabhotla; Monica Paliwal; Donald R Cantrell; Zachary A Smith Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2019-03-25 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Celmir de Oliveira Vilaça; Marco Orsini; Marco A Araujo Leite; Marcos R G de Freitas; Eduardo Davidovich; Rossano Fiorelli; Stenio Fiorelli; Camila Fiorelli; Acary Bulle Oliveira; Bruno Lima Pessoa Journal: Neurol Int Date: 2016-11-23