Literature DB >> 25044281

Monosomal karyotype is an independent predictor of survival in patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

Ruixian Xing1, Chengwen Li, Robert Peter Gale, Yue Zhang, Zefeng Xu, Tiejun Qin, Bing Li, Liwei Fang, Hongli Zhang, Lijuan Pan, Naibo Hu, Shiqiang Qu, Zhijian Xiao.   

Abstract

A monosomal karyotype (MK) correlates with poor survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, although whether this is also the case in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) remains controversial. Some studies report a correlation between a MK and a worse survival, whereas others claim that this correlation arises because of a confounding effect between a MK and a complex karyotype (CK). To address this question, we analyzed the clinical data and karyotypes of 610 adults with MDS. A MK was identified in 60 patients, of whom 55 (92%) also fulfilled the criteria for a CK. Conversely, a CK was found in 85 patients, of whom 55 (65%) also had a MK. To determine the impact of a MK on survival, 464 patients who received nonintensive therapies for MDS were analyzed separately. Patients with a MK demonstrated worse survival than those without a MK in univariate analyses (median, 8 months [95% CI, 3-12 months] versus 83 months [63-103 months]; P < 0.001). This effect was observed predominately in the cohorts of higher-risk patients according to the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System and the World Health Organization Prognostic Scoring System (HR [hazard ratio] 3.94 [1.97-7.89]; P < 0.001 and 4.937 [2.45-9.94]; P < 0.001, respectively) and surpassed the impact of a CK in the final survival models. Our data suggest that the addition of MK as a binary variable could improve the predictive accuracy of current models to estimate the survival of patients with MDS.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25044281     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.23801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  7 in total

1.  Monosomal karyotype at the time of diagnosis or transplantation predicts outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Celalettin Ustun; Bryan J Trottier; Zohar Sachs; Todd E DeFor; Leyla Shune; Elizabeth L Courville; Shernan G Holtan; Michelle Dolan; Daniel J Weisdorf; Erica D Warlick
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Monosomal karyotype is associated with poor outcomes in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving chemotherapy but not allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Zongru Li; Yueyun Lai; Xiaohui Zhang; Lanping Xu; Kaiyan Liu; Yu Wang; Chenhua Yan; Hao Jiang; Xiaojun Huang; Qian Jiang
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.673

3.  Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Outcomes in Monosomal Karyotype Myeloid Malignancies.

Authors:  Marcelo C Pasquini; Mei-Jie Zhang; Bruno C Medeiros; Philippe Armand; Zhen-Huan Hu; Taiga Nishihori; Mahmoud D Aljurf; Görgün Akpek; Jean-Yves Cahn; Mitchell S Cairo; Jan Cerny; Edward A Copelan; Abhinav Deol; César O Freytes; Robert Peter Gale; Siddhartha Ganguly; Biju George; Vikas Gupta; Gregory A Hale; Rammurti T Kamble; Thomas R Klumpp; Hillard M Lazarus; Selina M Luger; Jane L Liesveld; Mark R Litzow; David I Marks; Rodrigo Martino; Maxim Norkin; Richard F Olsson; Betul Oran; Attaphol Pawarode; Michael A Pulsipher; Muthalagu Ramanathan; Ran Reshef; Ayman A Saad; Wael Saber; Bipin N Savani; Harry C Schouten; Olle Ringdén; Martin S Tallman; Geoffrey L Uy; William A Wood; Baldeep Wirk; Waleska S Pérez; Minoo Batiwalla; Daniel J Weisdorf
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assay identifies additional copy number changes compared with R-band karyotype and provide more accuracy prognostic information in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Jingya Wang; Xiaofei Ai; Tiejun Qin; Zefeng Xu; Yue Zhang; Jinqin Liu; Bing Li; Liwei Fang; Hongli Zhang; Lijuan Pan; Naibo Hu; Shiqiang Qu; Wenyu Cai; Kun Ru; Yujiao Jia; Gang Huang; Zhijian Xiao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-03

5.  Prognostic Impact of IPSS-R and Chromosomal Translocations in 751 Korean Patients with Primary Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

Authors:  Koung Jin Suh; June-Won Cheong; Inho Kim; Hyeoung-Joon Kim; Dong-Yeop Shin; Youngil Koh; Sung-Soo Yoon; Yoo Hong Min; Jae-Sook Ahn; Yeo-Kyeoung Kim; Yun-Gyoo Lee; Jeong-Ok Lee; Soo-Mee Bang; Yeung-Chul Mun; Chu-Myoung Seong; Yong Park; Byung-Soo Kim; Junshik Hong; Jinny Park; Jae Hoon Lee; Sung-Yong Kim; Hong Ghi Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Techniques for detecting chromosomal aberrations in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Qibin Song; Min Peng; Yuxin Chu; Shiang Huang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-09

Review 7.  TP53 in Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Recent Biological and Clinical Findings.

Authors:  Cosimo Cumbo; Giuseppina Tota; Luisa Anelli; Antonella Zagaria; Giorgina Specchia; Francesco Albano
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.