Literature DB >> 25043813

Percutaneous tracheostomy: it's time for a shared approach!

Maria Vargas, Paolo Pelosi, Giuseppe Servillo.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25043813      PMCID: PMC4095574          DOI: 10.1186/cc13974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.

In a previous issue of Critical Care, Simon and colleagues [1] reported the incidence of death related to percutaneous tracheostomy (PT). Fatal complications occurred in 31% of cases during the procedure and in 49% of cases within the first week of the tracheostomy [1]. In a later issue of Critical Care, Rajendran and Hutchinson [2] suggested the use of a checklist, adapted from the World Health Organization (WHO) surgical safety checklist, to improve safety and reduce errors and harm related to the PT procedure in critical care. However, a recent observational study performed in 101 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, did not find any reduction in mortality or complications after the implementation of the WHO checklist in more than 100,000 surgical procedures [3]. PT is widely used in critical care, although no clinical guidelines have been developed to suggest the best practice for this invasive and risky procedure. Surveys on PT, performed in different European countries, have shown the presence of a shared clinical practice [4]. We think that, lacking clinical guidelines to provide the best available scientific evidence and to reduce inappropriate variation in PT practice, a careful analysis of different surveys may suggest to physicians the most common practice associated with PT. Table 1 shows shared clinical practice for PT from an analysis of seven national surveys performed in France (where 152 intensive care units participated in the survey), Germany (505), Italy (130), The Netherlands (63), Spain (100), Switzerland (48), and the UK (197).
Table 1

Shared clinical practice for percutaneous tracheostomy from an analysis of seven national surveys in Europe

FindingsMost common practice
Indications
Long-term mechanical ventilation, weaning failure, and upper airway obstruction
Techniques
Ciaglia single dilator and guide-wire dilating forceps
Timing
7 to 15 days after intensive care unit admission
Involved physicians in percutaneous tracheostomy
Intensivists; ear, nose, throat specialist; and general surgeon
Neck ultrasound evaluation
Screening before the procedure to assess at-risk structure
Ventilation protocol
Largely used with volume-controlled ventilation
Sedation protocol
Largely used in association with local anesthesia, analgesia, and neuromuscular blocking
Airway management
Endotracheal tube in place
Fiberoptic bronchoscopy
Largely used
Diameter of fiberoptic bronchoscope
3 to 5 mm
Intraprocedural complicationsMinor bleeding

The analysis was of seven national surveys performed in France (where 152 intensive care units participated in the survey), Germany (505), Italy (130), The Netherlands (63), Spain (100), Switzerland (48), and the UK (197).

Shared clinical practice for percutaneous tracheostomy from an analysis of seven national surveys in Europe The analysis was of seven national surveys performed in France (where 152 intensive care units participated in the survey), Germany (505), Italy (130), The Netherlands (63), Spain (100), Switzerland (48), and the UK (197).

Abbreviations

PT: percutaneous tracheostomy; WHO: World Health Organization.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
  4 in total

1.  Tracheostomy in Intensive Care Unit: a national survey in Italy.

Authors:  M Vargas; G Servillo; E Arditi; I Brunetti; L Pecunia; D Salami; C Putensen; M Antonelli; P Pelosi
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Introduction of surgical safety checklists in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  David R Urbach; Anand Govindarajan; Refik Saskin; Andrew S Wilton; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Checklist for percutaneous tracheostomy in critical care.

Authors:  Gokulnath Rajendran; Stephen Hutchinson
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 4.  Death after percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a systematic review and analysis of risk factors.

Authors:  Marcel Simon; Maria Metschke; Stephan A Braune; Klaus Püschel; Stefan Kluge
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 9.097

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Tracheostomy procedures in the intensive care unit: an international survey.

Authors:  Maria Vargas; Yuda Sutherasan; Massimo Antonelli; Iole Brunetti; Antonio Corcione; John G Laffey; Christian Putensen; Giuseppe Servillo; Paolo Pelosi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  Comparison between surgical and percutaneous tracheostomy effects on procalcitonin kinetics in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Maria Vargas; Pasquale Buonanno; Lina Giorgiano; Giovanna Sorriento; Carmine Iacovazzo; Giuseppe Servillo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 9.097

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.