Kate J Hodgson1, Katherine H Shelton1, Marianne B M van den Bree2. 1. School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. 2. Department of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Section of Forensic Psychiatry and Substance Misuse Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Homeless young people represent one of the most vulnerable and underserved populations. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of psychiatric disorder and comorbidity among a UK sample, and examine the longitudinal relationship between psychiatric conditions and different types of health service use. METHODS: 90 young people with experiences of homelessness were interviewed using a full psychiatric assessment. Participants were followed up 8-12 months later and completed an interview that included information about recent health service use (mental health, emergency room, general practitioner, hospital for physical problems, drug or alcohol services). FINDINGS: The prevalence of psychiatric disorder (88% current; 93% lifetime) and psychiatric comorbidity (73%) was high and that of mental health service use low in comparison (31%). Mood disorders, psychosis and suicide risk were significantly associated with mental health service use (OR 5.21, 95% CI 1.64 to 16.58; OR 10.0, CI 1.58 to 94.58; OR 6.25, CI 1.82 to 21.43, respectively). Emergency department use was predicted by mood disorders (OR 5.19, CI 1.68 to 16.0), psychosis (OR 7.33, CI 1.24 to 43.29), anxiety disorder (OR 2.88, CI 1.04 to 7.97), high-suicide risk (OR 3.42, CI 1.86 to 13.67) and comorbidity (OR 1.41, CI 1.05 to 1.90). DISCUSSION AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in homeless young people was high and considerably higher than that reported for this age group in the general population. There is a need for improved uptake of services delivering longer term treatment of psychiatric problems among vulnerable groups of socially excluded young people. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: Homeless young people represent one of the most vulnerable and underserved populations. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of psychiatric disorder and comorbidity among a UK sample, and examine the longitudinal relationship between psychiatric conditions and different types of health service use. METHODS: 90 young people with experiences of homelessness were interviewed using a full psychiatric assessment. Participants were followed up 8-12 months later and completed an interview that included information about recent health service use (mental health, emergency room, general practitioner, hospital for physical problems, drug or alcohol services). FINDINGS: The prevalence of psychiatric disorder (88% current; 93% lifetime) and psychiatric comorbidity (73%) was high and that of mental health service use low in comparison (31%). Mood disorders, psychosis and suicide risk were significantly associated with mental health service use (OR 5.21, 95% CI 1.64 to 16.58; OR 10.0, CI 1.58 to 94.58; OR 6.25, CI 1.82 to 21.43, respectively). Emergency department use was predicted by mood disorders (OR 5.19, CI 1.68 to 16.0), psychosis (OR 7.33, CI 1.24 to 43.29), anxiety disorder (OR 2.88, CI 1.04 to 7.97), high-suicide risk (OR 3.42, CI 1.86 to 13.67) and comorbidity (OR 1.41, CI 1.05 to 1.90). DISCUSSION AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in homeless young people was high and considerably higher than that reported for this age group in the general population. There is a need for improved uptake of services delivering longer term treatment of psychiatric problems among vulnerable groups of socially excluded young people. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: Denise Jaworsky; Anne Gadermann; Arnaud Duhoux; Trudy E Naismith; Monica Norena; Matthew J To; Stephen W Hwang; Anita Palepu Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Fiona H Duncan; Mike McGrath; Cleo Baskin; David Osborn; Jen Dykxhoorn; Eileen F S Kaner; Shamini Gnani; Louise LaFortune; Caroline Lee; Kate R Walters; James Kirkbride; Laura Fischer; Oli Jones; Vanessa Pinfold; Jude Stansfield; Emily J Oliver Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-07-13 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Micaela Mercado; J Marisol Marroquín; Kristin M Ferguson; Kimberly Bender; Jama Shelton; Kristen A Prock; Diane Santa Maria; Hsun-Ta Hsu; Sarah Carter Narendorf; Robin Petering; Anamika Barman-Adhikari Journal: SSM Popul Health Date: 2021-03-12