Literature DB >> 25043261

Sensory and motor thresholds of transcutaneous electrical stimulation are influenced by gender and age.

Rinaldo Roberto de Jesus Guirro1, Elaine Caldeira de Oliveira Guirro2, Natanael Teixeira Alves de Sousa3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (ES) is a therapeutic procedure used in rehabilitation. However, the effectiveness of it depends on sensory responses to pain and motor control in neuromuscular recruitment, considering the differences related to gender and age of the subjects treated, as well as the intensity and frequency of ES.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the threshold of sensory perception (TSP) and the threshold of motor response (TMR) in young and elderly individuals of both genders.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial.
SETTING: General community. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty volunteers with no history of systemic diseases were selected to participate in the study: 40 men and 40 women were subdivided by convenience sampling and age group into young male and female (age 21.6 ± 2.4 years) groups as well as into elderly female and male groups (age 72.6 ± 6.1 years).
INTERVENTIONS: The participants received electrical stimulation (ES) at 5 and 50 Hz, with pulse durations of 20, 100, 400, 1000, and 3000 μs applied on the flexor muscle bellies of the wrist and fingers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: TSP was identified as the first sensation of increased current intensity and TMR as the minimum muscle contraction detected. The results were submitted to analysis of variance, followed by the Tukey's test, with a significance level of 5%.
RESULTS: TSP was lower than TMR for all pulse durations, regardless of gender and age. In women, TSP was lower than that in young and elderly men at both frequencies. However, TSP was higher in elderly subjects than in younger subjects at 50 Hz for both genders. Age also affected the TMR, presenting higher thresholds in elderly subjects of both genders at 50 Hz; however the same occurred only in male subjects at 5 Hz.
CONCLUSION: Age and gender interfere directly with ES. These variables should be considered during rehabilitation because they indicate that electrical stimulation in elderly women should be carefully performed, as they have lower thresholds than elderly men when polarized currents are used, and there is a risk of skin lesion because of their high thresholds.
Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25043261     DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PM R        ISSN: 1934-1482            Impact factor:   2.298


  5 in total

1.  Bite Force, Occlusal Contact and Pain in Orthodontic Patients during Fixed-Appliance Treatment.

Authors:  Nicoline Mie Therkildsen; Liselotte Sonnesen
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-19

2.  Postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting among pre- and postmenopausal women undergoing cystocele and rectocele repair surgery.

Authors:  Sepideh Vahabi; Abolfazl Abaszadeh; Fatemeh Yari; Nazanin Yousefi
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-11-25

3.  Exploring Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Intensity Effects on Multifidus Muscle Activity in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: An Ultrasound Imaging-Informed Investigation.

Authors:  Jaclyn Megan Sions; DeJ'a Chyanna Crippen; Gregory Evan Hicks; Abdulmohsen Meshari Alroumi; Tara Jo Manal; Ryan Todd Pohlig
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-05-20

4.  Patient and Disease Characteristics Associate With Sensory Testing Results in Chronic Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Louise Kuhlmann; Søren S Olesen; Debbie Grønlund; Anne E Olesen; Anna E Phillips; Mahya Faghih; Asbjørn M Drewes
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.442

5.  EEG alpha activity increased in response to transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation in young healthy subjects but not in the healthy elderly.

Authors:  Ebru Yıldırım; Bahar Güntekin; Lütfü Hanoğlu; Candan Algun
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.