Literature DB >> 25042791

Validation of standard ASTM F2732 and comparison with ISO 11079 with respect to comfort temperature ratings for cold protective clothing.

Chuansi Gao1, Li-Yen Lin2, Amitava Halder3, Kalev Kuklane3, Ingvar Holmér3.   

Abstract

American standard ASTM F2732 estimates the lowest environmental temperature for thermal comfort for cold weather protective clothing. International standard ISO 11079 serves the same purpose but expresses cold stress in terms of required clothing insulation for a given cold climate. The objective of this study was to validate and compare the temperature ratings using human subject tests at two levels of metabolic rates (2 and 4 MET corresponding to 116.4 and 232.8 W/m(2)). Nine young and healthy male subjects participated in the cold exposure at 3.4 and -30.6 °C. The results showed that both standards predict similar temperature ratings for an intrinsic clothing insulation of 1.89 clo and for 2 MET activity. The predicted temperature rating for 2 MET activity is consistent with test subjects' thermophysiological responses, perceived thermal sensation and thermal comfort. For 4 MET activity, however, the whole body responses were on the cold side, particularly the responses of the extremities. ASTM F2732 is also limited due to its omission and simplification of three climatic variables (air velocity, radiant temperature and relative humidity) and exposure time in the cold which are of practical importance.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cold; Metabolic rate; Thermal comfort; protective clothing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25042791     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  4 in total

1.  Duration limits for exposure for the whole body and extremities with a military extreme cold protection clothing ensemble at an ambient temperature of -40°C.

Authors:  Jacob M T Cartwright; Clara V Etter; Elizabeth A Gnatiuk; Andrew S Perrotta; Faming Wang; Matthew D White
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2022-08-25

Review 2.  Skin Temperature Measurement Using Contact Thermometry: A Systematic Review of Setup Variables and Their Effects on Measured Values.

Authors:  Braid A MacRae; Simon Annaheim; Christina M Spengler; René M Rossi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Towards a wearable sensor system for continuous occupational cold stress assessment.

Authors:  Hanne Austad; Øystein Wiggen; Hilde Færevik; Trine M Seeberg
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 2.179

Review 4.  Is There a Need to Integrate Human Thermal Models with Weather Forecasts to Predict Thermal Stress?

Authors:  Jakob Petersson; Kalev Kuklane; Chuansi Gao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.