Literature DB >> 25042772

Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms--a cross-sectional study.

Johanna Hering1, Katja Hille1, Cornelia Frömke1, Christiane von Münchhausen1, Maria Hartmann1, Bettina Schneider1, Anika Friese2, Uwe Roesler2, Roswitha Merle1, Lothar Kreienbrock3.   

Abstract

A cross-sectional study concerning farm prevalence and risk factors for the count of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli (E. coli) (CREC) positive samples per sampling group on German fattening pig farms was performed in 2011 and 2012. Altogether 48 farms in four agricultural regions in the whole of Germany were investigated. Faecal samples, boot swabs and dust samples from two sampling groups per farm were taken and supplemental data were collected using a questionnaire. On 85% of the farms, at least one sample contained cefotaxime resistant E. coli colonies. Positive samples were more frequent in faeces (61%) and boot swabs (54%) than in dust samples (11%). Relevant variables from the questionnaire were analysed in a univariable mixed effect Poisson regression model. Variables that were related to the number (risk) of positive samples per sampling group with a p-value <0.2 were entered in a multivariable model. This model was reduced to statistically significant variables via backward selection. Factors that increased the risk for positive samples involved farm management and hygienic aspects. Farms that had a separate pen for diseased pigs had a 2.8 higher mean count of positive samples (95%-CI [1.71; 4.58], p=0.001) than farms without an extra pen. The mean count was increased on farms with under-floor exhaust ventilation compared to farms with over floor ventilation (2.22 [1.43; 3.46], p=0.001) and more positive samples were observed on farms that controlled flies with toxin compared to farms that did not (1.86 [1.24; 2.78], p=0.003). It can be concluded, that CREC are wide spread on German fattening pig farms. In addition the explorative approach of the present study suggests an influence of management strategies on the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant E. coli.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic resistance; ESBL; Epidemiologic study; Farm management; Pork production

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25042772     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Ecology of antimicrobial resistance: Special aspects of extended-spectrum β-lactamases].

Authors:  A Käsbohrer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  Multiresistant Gram-Negative Pathogens—A Zoonotic Problem.

Authors:  Robin Köck; Caroline Herr; Lothar Kreienbrock; Stefan Schwarz; Bernd-Alois Tenhagen; Birgit Walther
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Comparison of approaches for source attribution of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in Germany.

Authors:  Sara Perestrelo; Guido Correia Carreira; Lars Valentin; Jennie Fischer; Yvonne Pfeifer; Guido Werner; Judith Schmiedel; Linda Falgenhauer; Can Imirzalioglu; Trinad Chakraborty; Annemarie Käsbohrer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Antibiotic resistance: What is so special about multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria?

Authors:  Martin Exner; Sanjay Bhattacharya; Bärbel Christiansen; Jürgen Gebel; Peter Goroncy-Bermes; Philippe Hartemann; Peter Heeg; Carola Ilschner; Axel Kramer; Elaine Larson; Wolfgang Merkens; Martin Mielke; Peter Oltmanns; Birgit Ross; Manfred Rotter; Ricarda Maria Schmithausen; Hans-Günther Sonntag; Matthias Trautmann
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2017-04-10

5.  Antibiotic Resistances in Livestock: A Comparative Approach to Identify an Appropriate Regression Model for Count Data.

Authors:  Anke Hüls; Cornelia Frömke; Katja Ickstadt; Katja Hille; Johanna Hering; Christiane von Münchhausen; Maria Hartmann; Lothar Kreienbrock
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-05-31

6.  Risk factors for ESBL-producing Escherichia coli on pig farms: A longitudinal study in the context of reduced use of antimicrobials.

Authors:  Wietske Dohmen; Alejandro Dorado-García; Marc J M Bonten; Jaap A Wagenaar; Dik Mevius; Dick J J Heederik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Whole genome analyses of CMY-2-producing Escherichia coli isolates from humans, animals and food in Germany.

Authors:  Michael Pietsch; Alexandra Irrgang; Nicole Roschanski; Geovana Brenner Michael; Axel Hamprecht; Heime Rieber; Annemarie Käsbohrer; Stefan Schwarz; Uwe Rösler; Lothar Kreienbrock; Yvonne Pfeifer; Stephan Fuchs; Guido Werner
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Molecular Typing of Enterobacteriaceae from Pig Holdings in North-Western Germany Reveals Extended- Spectrum and AmpC β-Lactamases Producing but no Carbapenem Resistant Ones.

Authors:  Silvia García-Cobos; Robin Köck; Alexander Mellmann; Julia Frenzel; Alexander W Friedrich; John W A Rossen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Extended-Spectrum ß-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in Conventional and Organic Pig Fattening Farms.

Authors:  Katharina Meissner; Carola Sauter-Louis; Stefan E Heiden; Katharina Schaufler; Herbert Tomaso; Franz J Conraths; Timo Homeier-Bachmann
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-03-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.