Michal Tendera1, Kim Fox2, Roberto Ferrari3, Ian Ford4, Nicola Greenlaw4, Hélène Abergel5, Cezar Macarie6, Jean-Claude Tardif7, Panos Vardas8, José Zamorano9, P Gabriel Steg10. 1. Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland. 2. NHLI Imperial College, ICMS, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK. Electronic address: k.fox@rbht.nhs.uk. 3. Department of Cardiology and LTTA Centre, University Hospital of Ferrara and Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, E.S.: Health Science Foundation, Cotignola, Italy. 4. University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. 5. INSERM U-1148, Paris, France; Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France; AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France. 6. C.C. Iliescu Emergency Cardiovascular Diseases Institute, Bucharest, Romania. 7. Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montreal, Montreal, Canada. 8. University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece. 9. Instituto Cardiovascular, Hospital Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain. 10. NHLI Imperial College, ICMS, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; INSERM U-1148, Paris, France; Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France; AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To use CLARIFY, a prospective registry of patients with stable CAD (45 countries), to explore heart rate (HR) control and beta-blocker use. METHODS: We analyzed the CLARIFY population according to beta-blocker use via descriptive statistics with Pearson's χ(2) test for comparisons, as well as a multivariable stepwise model. RESULTS: Data on beta-blocker use was available for 32,914 patients, in whom HR was 68 ± 11 bpm; patients with angina, previous myocardial infarction, and heart failure had HRs of 69 ± 12, 68 ± 11, and 70 ± 12 bpm, respectively. 75% of these patients were receiving beta-blockers. Bisoprolol (34%), metoprolol tartrate (16%) or succinate (13%), atenolol (15%), and carvedilol (12%) were mostly used; mean dosages were 49%, 76%, 35%, 53%, and 45% of maximum doses, respectively. Patients aged <65 years were more likely to receive beta-blockers than patients ≥ 75 years (P<0.0001). Gender had no effect. Subjects with HR ≤ 60 bpm were more likely to be on beta-blockers than patients with HR ≥ 70 bpm (P<0.0001). Patients with angina, previous myocardial infarction, heart failure, and hypertension were more frequently receiving beta-blockers (all P<0.0001), and those with PAD and asthma/COPD less frequently (both P<0.0001). Beta-blocker use varied according to geographical region (from 87% to 67%). CONCLUSIONS: Three-quarters of patients with stable CAD receive beta-blockers. Even so, HR is insufficiently controlled in many patients, despite recent guidelines for the management of CAD. There is still much room for improvement in HR control in the management of stable CAD.
BACKGROUND: To use CLARIFY, a prospective registry of patients with stable CAD (45 countries), to explore heart rate (HR) control and beta-blocker use. METHODS: We analyzed the CLARIFY population according to beta-blocker use via descriptive statistics with Pearson's χ(2) test for comparisons, as well as a multivariable stepwise model. RESULTS: Data on beta-blocker use was available for 32,914 patients, in whom HR was 68 ± 11 bpm; patients with angina, previous myocardial infarction, and heart failure had HRs of 69 ± 12, 68 ± 11, and 70 ± 12 bpm, respectively. 75% of these patients were receiving beta-blockers. Bisoprolol (34%), metoprolol tartrate (16%) or succinate (13%), atenolol (15%), and carvedilol (12%) were mostly used; mean dosages were 49%, 76%, 35%, 53%, and 45% of maximum doses, respectively. Patients aged <65 years were more likely to receive beta-blockers than patients ≥ 75 years (P<0.0001). Gender had no effect. Subjects with HR ≤ 60 bpm were more likely to be on beta-blockers than patients with HR ≥ 70 bpm (P<0.0001). Patients with angina, previous myocardial infarction, heart failure, and hypertension were more frequently receiving beta-blockers (all P<0.0001), and those with PAD and asthma/COPD less frequently (both P<0.0001). Beta-blocker use varied according to geographical region (from 87% to 67%). CONCLUSIONS: Three-quarters of patients with stable CAD receive beta-blockers. Even so, HR is insufficiently controlled in many patients, despite recent guidelines for the management of CAD. There is still much room for improvement in HR control in the management of stable CAD.