Literature DB >> 25041609

Italian external and multicentric validation of the MD Anderson Cancer Center nomogram and prognostic index for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients: analysis of 1502 cases.

Massimo Gentile1, Francesca R Mauro, Davide Rossi, Iolanda Vincelli, Giovanni Tripepi, Anna G Recchia, Laura De Stefano, Melissa Campanelli, Diana Giannarelli, Sabrina Bossio, Lucio Morabito, Ernesto Vigna, Gianluca Gaidano, Robin Foà, Fortunato Morabito.   

Abstract

We performed an external and multicentric validation of the nomogram and prognostic index (PI) proposed by the MD Anderson Cancer Center to prognostically stratify chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) patients in 1502 CLL cases. All six parameters involved in the nomogram and PI (age, sex, absolute lymphocyte count, number of lymph node groups, Rai stage and β2-microglobulin) were independently associated with survival. The nomogram was accurate in predicting survival (c-index = 0·82). According to the PI, 38·7% of patients were at low-risk, 58·3% at intermediate-risk and 3% at high-risk. The estimated median survival times were: not reached for low-risk, 13·4 years for intermediate-risk and 3·4 years for high-risk. The estimated median and 5-year survival by PI were similar to those originally reported. The PI remained a predictor of survival when analysis was limited to 847 Rai stage 0 (P < 0·0001) and 151 clinical monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (cMBL) cases (P = 0·033). Finally, the PI allowed prediction of time to therapy in all patients (P < 0·0001), in Rai 0 (P < 0·0001) and in cMBL cases (P = 0·044). Our results confirm the ability of the PI to predict prognosis, even in early stage disease cases. The study also extended the utility of the PI to cMBL cases.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; nomogram; prognosis; prognostic index

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25041609     DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of Prognostic Impact of Soluble CD14 in B-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Waiel Al-Kahiry; Homam Sharshira; Amal Ghanem; Maha El-Gammal; Irene Lewis Mikhael
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 2.  Prognostic Factors for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Christopher Chen; Soham Puvvada
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.952

3.  The prognostic role of HBV infection in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Jin-Hua Liang; Rui Gao; Jun-Cheng Dai; Robert Peter Gale; Wang Li; Lei Fan; Zhi-Bin Hu; Wei Xu; Jian-Yong Li
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Is Cd11c and Fmc7 Negativity in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Poor Prognostic?

Authors:  Aysun Şentürk Yikilmaz; Sema Akinci; Şule Mine Bakanay; Zeynep Büşra Zengin; İmdat Dilek
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 5.  Prognostic Factors in the Era of Targeted Therapies in CLL.

Authors:  Prajwal Boddu; Alessandra Ferrajoli
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.952

6.  The International Prognostic Index for Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Has the Higher Value in Predicting Overall Outcome Compared with the Barcelona-Brno Biomarkers Only Prognostic Model and the MD Anderson Cancer Center Prognostic Index.

Authors:  Carolina Muñoz-Novas; María Poza-Santaella; Isabel González-Gascón Y Marín; María Hernández-Sánchez; Ana-Eugenia Rodríguez-Vicente; María-Stefania Infante; Cecilia Heras; María-Ángeles Foncillas; Karen Marín; Jesús-María Hernández-Rivas; José-Ángel Hernández
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Smudge cell percentage as a surrogate marker for ZAP-70 expression in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Waiel Al-Kahiry; Hadeel Said Tawfik; Homam Sharshira; Amal Ghanem; Maha El-Gammal; Irene Lewis Mikhael
Journal:  Blood Res       Date:  2018-09-28

8.  Tailored approaches grounded on immunogenetic features for refined prognostication in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Panagiotis Baliakas; Theodoros Moysiadis; Anastasia Hadzidimitriou; Aliki Xochelli; Sabine Jeromin; Andreas Agathangelidis; Mattias Mattsson; Lesley-Ann Sutton; Eva Minga; Lydia Scarfò; Davide Rossi; Zadie Davis; Neus Villamor; Helen Parker; Jana Kotaskova; Evangelia Stalika; Karla Plevova; Larry Mansouri; Diego Cortese; Alba Navarro; Julio Delgado; Marta Larrayoz; Emma Young; Achilles Anagnostopoulos; Karin E Smedby; Gunnar Juliusson; Oonagh Sheehy; Mark Catherwood; Jonathan C Strefford; Niki Stavroyianni; Chrysoula Belessi; Sarka Pospisilova; David Oscier; Gianluca Gaidano; Elias Campo; Claudia Haferlach; Paolo Ghia; Richard Rosenquist; Kostas Stamatopoulos
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 9.941

9.  Inheritance of Susceptibility to Malignant Blood Disorders.

Authors:  Viggo Jønsson; Haneef Awan; Neil D Jones; Tom B Johannesen; Bjarni Á Steig; Gudrid Andosdottir; Geir E Tjønnfjord
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Prognostic models for newly-diagnosed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nina Kreuzberger; Johanna Aag Damen; Marialena Trivella; Lise J Estcourt; Angela Aldin; Lisa Umlauff; Maria Dla Vazquez-Montes; Robert Wolff; Karel Gm Moons; Ina Monsef; Farid Foroutan; Karl-Anton Kreuzer; Nicole Skoetz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.