Literature DB >> 25041419

Clinical outcome of deep brain stimulation for dystonia: constant-current or constant-voltage stimulation? A non-randomized study.

C Lettieri1, S Rinaldo, G Devigili, F Pisa, M Mucchiut, E Belgrado, M Mondani, S D'Auria, T Ius, M Skrap, R Eleopra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Bilateral globus pallidus deep brain stimulation (GPi-DBS) represents an effective and relatively safe therapy for different forms of refractory dystonia. The aim of this study was to assess, retrospectively, the effect of two different stimulation settings during GPi-DBS in 22 patients affected by primary generalized or multi-segmental dystonia.
METHODS: Thirteen patients were stimulated using a voltage-controlled setting whilst in the other nine patients a current-controlled setting was used. Clinical features were evaluated for each patient at baseline, 6 months and 12 months after surgery by means of the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale.
RESULTS: Globus pallidus deep brain stimulation was effective in all patients. However, comparing constant-current and constant-voltage stimulation, a better outcome was found in the current-controlled group during the last 6 months of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Current-controlled stimulation is effective during GPi-DBS for primary dystonia and it could be a better choice than voltage-controlled stimulation over long-term follow-up.
© 2014 The Author(s) European Journal of Neurology © 2014 EAN.

Entities:  

Keywords:  constant-current stimulation; constant-voltage stimulation; deep brain stimulation; dystonia; impedance

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25041419     DOI: 10.1111/ene.12515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurol        ISSN: 1351-5101            Impact factor:   6.089


  10 in total

Review 1.  Deep Brain Stimulation Emergencies: How the New Technologies Could Modify the Current Scenario.

Authors:  Giovanni Cossu; Mariachiara Sensi
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Deep brain stimulation in essential tremor: targets, technology, and a comprehensive review of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Joshua K Wong; Christopher W Hess; Leonardo Almeida; Erik H Middlebrooks; Evangelos A Christou; Erin E Patrick; Aparna Wagle Shukla; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.618

Review 3.  Update on Deep Brain Stimulation for Dyskinesia and Dystonia: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Hiroki Toda; Hidemoto Saiki; Namiko Nishida; Koichi Iwasaki
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 4.  Advances in closed-loop deep brain stimulation devices.

Authors:  Mahboubeh Parastarfeizabadi; Abbas Z Kouzani
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 5.  Environmental Factors That Influence Stem Cell Migration: An "Electric Field".

Authors:  Stephanie N Iwasa; Robart Babona-Pilipos; Cindi M Morshead
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 6.  Developments in Deep Brain Stimulators for Successful Aging Towards Smart Devices-An Overview.

Authors:  Angelito A Silverio; Lean Angelo A Silverio
Journal:  Front Aging       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 7.  Technology of deep brain stimulation: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Joachim K Krauss; Nir Lipsman; Tipu Aziz; Alexandre Boutet; Peter Brown; Jin Woo Chang; Benjamin Davidson; Warren M Grill; Marwan I Hariz; Andreas Horn; Michael Schulder; Antonios Mammis; Peter A Tass; Jens Volkmann; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 42.937

8.  Differential Modulation of Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons during Periodic Stimulation.

Authors:  Mufti Mahmud; Stefano Vassanelli
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Management of Elevated Therapeutic Impedances on Deep Brain Stimulation Leads.

Authors:  Wissam Deeb; Amar Patel; Michael S Okun; Aysegul Gunduz
Journal:  Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y)       Date:  2017-09-21

10.  Two-year safety and efficacy outcomes for the treatment of overactive bladder using a long-lived rechargeable sacral neuromodulation system.

Authors:  Bertil Blok; Philip Van Kerrebroeck; Stephan de Wachter; Alain Ruffion; Frank Van der Aa; Marie Aimée Perrouin-Verbe; Sohier Elneil
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.696

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.