Literature DB >> 25041370

Short-term effects of a modified Alt-RAMEC protocol for early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a controlled study.

C Masucci1, L Franchi, V Giuntini, E Defraia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of a modified alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction (Alt-RAMEC) protocol in combination with facemask (FM) in Class III growing patients. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Thirty one Class III patients (17 males, 14 females) were treated with a modified Alt-RAMEC/FM protocol at the Department of Orthodontics of the University of Florence.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients were evaluated at the beginning (T1, mean age 6.4 ± 0.8 years) and at the end of orthopedic therapy (T2, mean age 8.1 ± 0.9 years), and they were compared to a matched sample of 31 Class III patients (16 males and 15 females) treated with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask (RME/FM) and to a matched control group of 21 subjects (9 males and 12 females) with untreated Class III malocclusion. The three groups were compared with anova with Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple tests.
RESULTS: Both the Alt-RAMEC/FM and the RME/FM protocols showed significantly favorable effects leading to correction of the Class III malocclusion. The Alt-RAMEC/FM protocol produced a more effective advancement of the maxilla (SNA +1.2°) and greater intermaxillary changes (ANB +1.7°) vs. the RME/FM protocol. No significant differences were recorded as for mandibular skeletal changes and vertical skeletal relationships.
CONCLUSION: The Alt-RAMEC/FM protocol induced more favorable skeletal short-term effects compared with RME/FM therapy in Class III growing patients.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angle Class III malocclusion; cephalometry; interceptive treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25041370     DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res        ISSN: 1601-6335            Impact factor:   1.826


  15 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Moritz Foersch; Collin Jacobs; Susanne Wriedt; Marlene Hechtner; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate : Evaluation of soft and hard tissues using the Alt-RAMEC protocol.

Authors:  Ege Dogan; Ozlem Seckin
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Bonded versus banded rapid palatal expander followed by facial mask therapy: analysis on digital dental casts.

Authors:  Roberta Lione; Luis Tomas Huanca Ghislanzoni; Efisio Defraia; Lorenzo Franchi; Paola Cozza
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  An interview with Benedict Wilmes.

Authors:  Guilherme Thiesen; Marcus Vinícius Neiva Nunes do Rego; Jorge Faber; Ki Beom Kim
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

5.  Does Maxillary Protraction with Alt-RAMEC Protocol Affect Inferior Sclera Exposure? A Controlled 3dMD Study.

Authors:  Yasemin Bahar Acar; Hanife Nuray Yılmaz; Elvan Önem Özbilen
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2022-03

6.  Three-dimensional evaluation of treatment results of the Alt-RAMEC and facemask protocol in growing patients.

Authors:  V Sitaropoulou; H N Yilmaz; B Yilmaz; N Kucukkeles
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Cephalometric effects of Pushing Splints 3 compared with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class III malocclusion children: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Angela Galeotti; Stefano Martina; Valeria Viarani; Lorenzo Franchi; Roberto Rongo; Vincenzo D'Antò; Paola Festa
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Is alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction an effective protocol in the treatment of Class III malocclusion? A systematic review.

Authors:  Matheus Melo Pithon; Nathalia de Lima Santos; Camila Rangel Barreto Dos Santos; Felipe Carvalho Souza Baião; Murilo Costa Rangel Pinheiro; Manoel Matos; Ianderlei Andrade Souza; Rafael Pereira de Paula
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

9.  Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Nicky Mandall; Richard Cousley; Andrew DiBiase; Fiona Dyer; Simon Littlewood; Rye Mattick; Spencer J Nute; Barbara Doherty; Nadia Stivaros; Ross McDowall; Inderjit Shargill; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2016-09

10.  Early Class III treatment with Hybrid-Hyrax - Facemask in comparison to Hybrid-Hyrax-Mentoplate - skeletal and dental outcomes.

Authors:  Jan H Willmann; Manuel Nienkemper; Nour Eldin Tarraf; Benedict Wilmes; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.