A De Ruigh1, S Roman, J Chen, J E Pandolfino, P J Kahrilas. 1. Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that Gaviscon Double Action Liquid (a combination alginate-antacid) administered post-prandially co-localises with the acid pocket, the 'reservoir' for post-prandial acid reflux. AIM: To compare the effectiveness of Gaviscon Double Action Liquid to an equivalent strength antacid without alginate in controlling post-prandial acid reflux in GERD patients. METHODS:Fourteen GERD patients undertook two 3.5-h high-resolution manometry/pH-impedance studies during which they ate a standardised meal. In a double-blinded randomised crossover design they then took Gaviscon or CVS brand antacid, each with ~18 mmol/L acid neutralising capacity. The primary outcome was distal oesophageal acid exposure; secondary outcomes were number of reflux events, proximal extent of reflux, nadir pH of the refluxate, mechanism of reflux and reflux symptoms scored with a validated instrument. RESULTS: Ten patients completed the study. Gaviscon studies had significantly less distal oesophageal acid exposure and greater nadir refluxate pH in the 30-150 min post-prandial period than antacid studies. There were no differences in the number of reflux events (acid or weakly acidic) or the number of proximal reflux events (15-17 cm above the LES) with either study medication. CONCLUSIONS:Gaviscon Double Action Liquid is more effective than an antacid without alginate in controlling post-prandial oesophageal acid exposure. However, the number and spatial distribution of reflux events within the oesophagus are similar. This suggests that Gaviscon main effectiveness relates to its co-localisation with and displacement/neutralisation of the post-prandial acid pocket, rather than preventing reflux.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that Gaviscon Double Action Liquid (a combination alginate-antacid) administered post-prandially co-localises with the acid pocket, the 'reservoir' for post-prandial acid reflux. AIM: To compare the effectiveness of Gaviscon Double Action Liquid to an equivalent strength antacid without alginate in controlling post-prandial acid reflux in GERDpatients. METHODS: Fourteen GERDpatients undertook two 3.5-h high-resolution manometry/pH-impedance studies during which they ate a standardised meal. In a double-blinded randomised crossover design they then took Gaviscon or CVS brand antacid, each with ~18 mmol/L acid neutralising capacity. The primary outcome was distal oesophageal acid exposure; secondary outcomes were number of reflux events, proximal extent of reflux, nadir pH of the refluxate, mechanism of reflux and reflux symptoms scored with a validated instrument. RESULTS: Ten patients completed the study. Gaviscon studies had significantly less distal oesophageal acid exposure and greater nadir refluxate pH in the 30-150 min post-prandial period than antacid studies. There were no differences in the number of reflux events (acid or weakly acidic) or the number of proximal reflux events (15-17 cm above the LES) with either study medication. CONCLUSIONS:Gaviscon Double Action Liquid is more effective than an antacid without alginate in controlling post-prandial oesophageal acid exposure. However, the number and spatial distribution of reflux events within the oesophagus are similar. This suggests that Gaviscon main effectiveness relates to its co-localisation with and displacement/neutralisation of the post-prandial acid pocket, rather than preventing reflux.
Authors: Peter J Kahrilas; Nicholas J Shaheen; Michael F Vaezi; Stephen W Hiltz; Edgar Black; Irvin M Modlin; Steve P Johnson; John Allen; Joel V Brill Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Peter J Kahrilas; Kenneth McColl; Mark Fox; Lisa O'Rourke; Daniel Sifrim; Andre J P M Smout; Guy Boeckxstaens Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-04-30 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: John E Pandolfino; Qing Zhang; Sudip K Ghosh; Jennifer Post; Monika Kwiatek; Peter J Kahrilas Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2007-08-21 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: R Sweis; E Kaufman; A Anggiansah; T Wong; P Dettmar; M Fried; W Schwizer; R K Avvari; A Pal; M Fox Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Wout O Rohof; Roel J Bennink; Andre J P M Smout; Edward Thomas; Guy E Boeckxstaens Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2013-05-10 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Serhat Bor; İsmail Hakkı Kalkan; Altay Çelebi; Dinç Dinçer; Filiz Akyüz; Peter Dettmar; Hasan Özen Journal: Turk J Gastroenterol Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: D A Leiman; B P Riff; S Morgan; D C Metz; G W Falk; B French; C A Umscheid; J D Lewis Journal: Dis Esophagus Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 3.429
Authors: Andreas Steingoetter; Matthias Sauter; Jelena Curcic; Dian Liu; Dieter Menne; Michael Fried; Mark Fox; Werner Schwizer Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 3.067