Literature DB >> 25041127

Impacts of breeder loss on social structure, reproduction and population growth in a social canid.

Bridget L Borg1,2, Scott M Brainerd1,3, Thomas J Meier2, Laura R Prugh1.   

Abstract

The importance of individuals to the dynamics of populations may depend on reproductive status, especially for species with complex social structure. Loss of reproductive individuals in socially complex species could disproportionately affect population dynamics by destabilizing social structure and reducing population growth. Alternatively, compensatory mechanisms such as rapid replacement of breeders may result in little disruption. The impact of breeder loss on the population dynamics of social species remains poorly understood. We evaluated the effect of breeder loss on social stability, recruitment and population growth of grey wolves (Canis lupus) in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska using a 26-year dataset of 387 radiocollared wolves. Harvest of breeding wolves is a highly contentious conservation and management issue worldwide, with unknown population-level consequences. Breeder loss preceded 77% of cases (n = 53) of pack dissolution from 1986 to 2012. Packs were more likely to dissolve if a female or both breeders were lost and pack size was small. Harvest of breeders increased the probability of pack dissolution, likely because the timing of harvest coincided with the breeding season of wolves. Rates of denning and successful recruitment were uniformly high for packs that did not experience breeder loss; however, packs that lost breeders exhibited lower denning and recruitment rates. Breeder mortality and pack dissolution had no significant effects on immediate or longer term population dynamics. Our results indicate the importance of breeding individuals is context dependent. The impact of breeder loss on social group persistence, reproduction and population growth may be greatest when average group sizes are small and mortality occurs during the breeding season. This study highlights the importance of reproductive individuals in maintaining group cohesion in social species, but at the population level socially complex species may be resilient to disruption and harvest through strong compensatory mechanisms. Published 2014. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canis lupus; den fidelity; gray wolf; grey wolf; harvest mortality; hunting pack dynamics; reproductive heterogeneity; social organization; social species; trapping

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25041127     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  20 in total

1.  Harvest and group effects on pup survival in a cooperative breeder.

Authors:  David E Ausband; Michael S Mitchell; Carisa R Stansbury; Jennifer L Stenglein; Lisette P Waits
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Collective movement in ecology: from emerging technologies to conservation and management.

Authors:  Peter A H Westley; Andrew M Berdahl; Colin J Torney; Dora Biro
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Space Use and Habitat Selection by Resident and Transient Red Wolves (Canis rufus).

Authors:  Joseph W Hinton; Christine Proctor; Marcella J Kelly; Frank T van Manen; Michael R Vaughan; Michael J Chamberlain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Blood may buy goodwill: no evidence for a positive relationship between legal culling and poaching in Wisconsin.

Authors:  Audun Stien
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Let's stay together? Intrinsic and extrinsic factors involved in pair bond dissolution in a recolonizing wolf population.

Authors:  Cyril Milleret; Petter Wabakken; Olof Liberg; Mikael Åkesson; Øystein Flagstad; Harry Peter Andreassen; Håkan Sand
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 6.  A conceptual framework for understanding illegal killing of large carnivores.

Authors:  Neil H Carter; José Vicente López-Bao; Jeremy T Bruskotter; Meredith Gore; Guillaume Chapron; Arlyne Johnson; Yaffa Epstein; Mahendra Shrestha; Jens Frank; Omar Ohrens; Adrian Treves
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.129

7.  Comment on: 'Blood does not buy goodwill: allowing culling increases poaching of a large carnivore'.

Authors:  Kim M Pepin; Shannon L Kay; Amy J Davis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Conflict Misleads Large Carnivore Management and Conservation: Brown Bears and Wolves in Spain.

Authors:  Alberto Fernández-Gil; Javier Naves; Andrés Ordiz; Mario Quevedo; Eloy Revilla; Miguel Delibes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Implications of Harvest on the Boundaries of Protected Areas for Large Carnivore Viewing Opportunities.

Authors:  Bridget L Borg; Stephen M Arthur; Nicholas A Bromen; Kira A Cassidy; Rick McIntyre; Douglas W Smith; Laura R Prugh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Predators and the public trust.

Authors:  Adrian Treves; Guillaume Chapron; Jose V López-Bao; Chase Shoemaker; Apollonia R Goeckner; Jeremy T Bruskotter
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2015-11-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.