Literature DB >> 25040889

Fearful faces drive gaze-cueing and threat bias effects in children on the lookout for danger.

Amy Dawel1, Romina Palermo, Richard O'Kearney, Jessica Irons, Elinor McKone.   

Abstract

Most developmental studies of face emotion processing show faces in isolation, in the absence of any broader context. Here we investigate two types of interactions between expression and threat contexts. First, in adults, following of another person's direction of social attention is increased when that person shows fear and the context requires vigilance for danger. We investigate whether this also occurs in children. Using a Posner-style eye-gaze cueing paradigm, we tested whether children would show greater gaze-cueing from fearful than happy expressions when the task was to be vigilant for possible dangerous animals. Testing across the 8-12-year-old age range, we found this fear priority effect was absent in the youngest children but developed to reach adult levels in the oldest children. However, even the oldest children were unable to sustain fear-prioritization when the onset of the target was delayed. Second, we addressed the development of 'threat bias' - namely faster identification of dangerous animals than safe animals - in the social context provided by expressive faces. In our non-anxious samples (i.e. with typical-population levels of anxiety), adults showed a threat bias regardless of the expression or looking direction of the just-seen cue face whereas 8-12-year-olds only showed a threat bias when the just-seen cue face displayed fear. Overall, the results argue that some, but not all, aspects of expression-context interactions are mature by 12 years of age.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25040889     DOI: 10.1111/desc.12203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  6 in total

1.  Emotion first: children prioritize emotional faces in gaze-cued attentional orienting.

Authors:  Anna Pecchinenda; Manuel Petrucci
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-08-08

2.  It is not always positive: emotional bias in young and older adults.

Authors:  Giada Viviani; Francesca De Luca; Gabriella Antonucci; Alla Yankouskaya; Anna Pecchinenda
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-10-26

3.  Children can discriminate the authenticity of happy but not sad or fearful facial expressions, and use an immature intensity-only strategy.

Authors:  Amy Dawel; Romina Palermo; Richard O'Kearney; Elinor McKone
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-05

4.  No Influence of Emotional Faces or Autistic Traits on Gaze-Cueing in General Population.

Authors:  Shota Uono; Yuka Egashira; Sayuri Hayashi; Miki Takada; Masatoshi Ukezono; Takashi Okada
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-26

5.  Emotion Unchained: Facial Expression Modulates Gaze Cueing under Cognitive Load.

Authors:  Anna Pecchinenda; Manuel Petrucci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Seeing Eye to Eye With Threat: Atypical Threat Bias in Children With 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome.

Authors:  Abbie M Popa; Joshua R Cruz; Ling M Wong; Danielle J Harvey; Kathleen Angkustsiri; Ingrid N Leckliter; Koraly Perez-Edgar; Tony J Simon
Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2019-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.