Bonnielin K Swenor1, Karen Bandeen-Roche, Beatriz Muñoz, Sheila K West. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether performance speeds mediate the association between visual impairment and self-reported mobility disability over an 8-year period. DESIGN: Longitudinal analysis. SETTING: Salisbury, Maryland. PARTICIPANTS: Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study participants aged 65 and older (N=2,520). MEASUREMENTS: Visual impairment was defined as best-corrected visual acuity worse than 20/40 in the better-seeing eye or visual field less than 20°. Self-reported mobility disability on three tasks was assessed: walking up stairs, walking down stairs, and walking 150 feet. Performance speed on three similar tasks was measured: walking up steps (steps/s), walking down steps (steps/s), and walking 4 m (m/s). RESULTS: For each year of observation, the odds of reporting mobility disability was significantly greater for participants who were visually impaired (VI) than for those who were not (NVI) (odds ratio (OR) difficulty walking up steps=1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.32-1.89; OR difficulty walking down steps=1.90, 95% CI=1.59-2.28; OR difficulty walking 150 feet=2.11, 95% CI=1.77-2.51). Once performance speed on a similar mobility task was included in the models, VI participants were no longer more likely to report mobility disability than those who were NVI (OR difficulty walking up steps=0.84, 95% CI=0.65-1.11; OR difficulty walking down steps=0.96, 95% CI=0.74-1.24; OR difficulty walking 150 feet=1.22, 95% CI=0.98-1.50). CONCLUSION: Slower performance speed in VI individuals largely accounted for the difference in the odds of reporting mobility disability, suggesting that VI older adults walk slower and are therefore more likely to report mobility disability than those who are NVI. Improving mobility performance in older adults with visual impairment may minimize the perception of mobility disability.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether performance speeds mediate the association between visual impairment and self-reported mobility disability over an 8-year period. DESIGN: Longitudinal analysis. SETTING: Salisbury, Maryland. PARTICIPANTS: Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study participants aged 65 and older (N=2,520). MEASUREMENTS: Visual impairment was defined as best-corrected visual acuity worse than 20/40 in the better-seeing eye or visual field less than 20°. Self-reported mobility disability on three tasks was assessed: walking up stairs, walking down stairs, and walking 150 feet. Performance speed on three similar tasks was measured: walking up steps (steps/s), walking down steps (steps/s), and walking 4 m (m/s). RESULTS: For each year of observation, the odds of reporting mobility disability was significantly greater for participants who were visually impaired (VI) than for those who were not (NVI) (odds ratio (OR) difficulty walking up steps=1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.32-1.89; OR difficulty walking down steps=1.90, 95% CI=1.59-2.28; OR difficulty walking 150 feet=2.11, 95% CI=1.77-2.51). Once performance speed on a similar mobility task was included in the models, VI participants were no longer more likely to report mobility disability than those who were NVI (OR difficulty walking up steps=0.84, 95% CI=0.65-1.11; OR difficulty walking down steps=0.96, 95% CI=0.74-1.24; OR difficulty walking 150 feet=1.22, 95% CI=0.98-1.50). CONCLUSION: Slower performance speed in VI individuals largely accounted for the difference in the odds of reporting mobility disability, suggesting that VI older adults walk slower and are therefore more likely to report mobility disability than those who are NVI. Improving mobility performance in older adults with visual impairment may minimize the perception of mobility disability.
Authors: S K West; B Munoz; G S Rubin; O D Schein; K Bandeen-Roche; S Zeger; S German; L P Fried Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: G S Rubin; S K West; B Muñoz; K Bandeen-Roche; S Zeger; O Schein; L P Fried Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Yurun Cai; Jennifer A Schrack; Hang Wang; Jian-Yu E; Amal A Wanigatunga; Yuri Agrawal; Jacek K Urbanek; Eleanor M Simonsick; Luigi Ferrucci; Bonnielin K Swenor Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2021-11-15 Impact factor: 6.053